Rehabiliation Using HUBER 360 to Reduce the Risk of Falls (HUBER-FALLS)

May 11, 2023 updated by: Charlotte Beaudart, University of Liege

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Using the HUBER 360 Tool to Reduce the Risk of Falls in People in Pathological Situations Requiring Functional Rehabilitation

Aim: The aim of the present study was to analyse the effects of training performed on a rotating, motorised platform (the Huber/SpineForce device from LPG Systems, Valence, France) intended to reduce the risk of falls.

Subjects: any patient 1) benefiting from a physiotherapy rehabilitation program at the CHU Liège, CNRF, Belgium; 2) presenting a pathological situation justifying functional rehabilitation with HUBER 360®; 3) presenting any pathology not constituting an exclusion criterion; 4) giving informed consent to research will be include in this 8-week interventional trial.

Design: randomized open-label trial. Patients will be randomized into the intervention group (HUBER trainig, 45 minutes of training, twice a week during 8 weeks) or in the control group (standard care).

Outcomes: the effect of the training will be measured on the Time-Up-and-Go test, on the Short-Physical performance battery test and on quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Liège
      • Tinlot, Liège, Belgium, 4557
        • CHU Liège, CNRF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient benefiting from a physiotherapy rehabilitation program at the CHU Liège, CNRF
  • Patient presenting a pathological situation justifying functional rehabilitation with HUBER 360®
  • Patient presenting any pathology not constituting an exclusion criterion
  • Patient giving informed consent to research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac or respiratory or neurological or rheumatological disease incompatible with physical activity ;
  • Joint inflammation;
  • Rheumatic disease in acute phase;
  • Recent trauma, infection of the musculoskeletal system;
  • Fever;
  • Venous thrombosis ;
  • Discopathy in acute phase;
  • Neuropsychological problems that do not allow to integrate the instructions or other serious psychological problems;
  • Cardiovascular diseases and any progressive, chronic, counter-indicative disease;
  • Large anatomical deformities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HUBER

HUBER is an isometric strengthening device. It consists of an oval motorized platform, which performs rotating, oscillatory movements with a controlled amplitude and speed.

Intervention will consist of 2 sessions of HUBER per week. Each session lasts approximatively 30 minutes. The intervention is 8 weeks long.

The HUBER® device consists of an oval motorized platform, which performs rotating, oscillatory movements with a controlled amplitude and speed. It also comprises, two large handles with force sensors, mounted on a movable column. Its originality is based on its capacity to capture simultaneously the subjects' balance, core stability, core strength and total body strength; and adapt the training accordingly. Indeed, the platform interferes with the balance of the patient who must continually adjust his/her posture by exerting isometric pushing and pulling efforts with the arms. As a result, the device provides postural and muscle adaptation with visual feedback. Due to the constant adaptation of the device, it is thought to enhance muscular strength and improve neuromuscular coordination simultaneously.
No Intervention: Control
The control group will not received any intervention except usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk of falls, in seconds
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Measured with Timed-Up-and Go test
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical performance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery test (SPPB test). The test is scored from 0 (lower physical performance) to 12 (highest physical performance)
8 weeks
Quality of life, measured with the Short Form-36 questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks
SF-36 generic quality of life questionnaire. The score obtained from this questionnaire is composed with a Physcial component Scale (PMS) and a Mental component scale (MCS). Results are scored from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life).
8 weeks
Utility score using the EuroQol- 5 Dimension questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Descriptive data from the 5 dimensions can be used to generate a health-related quality of life profile for the subject. The questionnaire is scored from 0 (worst health state imaginable) to 100 (best health state imaginable).
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jean-François Kaux, MD PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUBER_CNRF01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on HUBER (LPG Systems, France)

Subscribe