Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients

A Trial to Compare the Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients With Surgical Arterial Repair

The most frequent access site for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the common femoral artery (CFA), using either an open or percutaneous technique. Currently, percutaneous closure devices for femoral arterial access sites are approved for use only when a 10-F or smaller sheath has been used. However, the availability of the Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) device has now made it possible to perform percutaneous vessel closure after using larger sheaths.The preclose technique using Perclose ProGlide, has been widely used in endovascular procedures. In a prospective randomized study, complication rates at the access site were similar in patients who underwent total percutaneous access (including percutaneous arteriotomy closure) than in those who underwent surgical cutdown and subsequent surgical closure. Total percutaneous closure of femoral arterial access sites increases patient comfort and decreases the rate of wound infections and lymphatic fistulas.[6,7] Furthermore, patients are mobilized and discharged earlier following the use of closure devices than with compression alone. Despite the above observations, no data have been published regarding percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in patients who have undergone VA-ECMO. In this study, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of a percutaneous closure technique using Perclose ProGlide to close the CFA access site after VA-ECMO.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

all patients who underwent VA-ECMO

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- The study included all patients who underwent VA-ECMO and in whom Perclose ProGlide was deployed to achieve hemostasis during closure of the CFA site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded if 24 hour and 30-day follow-up data regarding the access sites and other clinical outcomes were not available.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Perclose ProGlide
Perclose ProGlide group: use Perclose ProGlide to suture the artery
Surgical Arterial Repair
Surgical Arterial Repair group : suture the artery by surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perclose technical success
Time Frame: 1day
successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive surgical or endovascular procedures.
1day
Primary device failure
Time Frame: 1day
obvious closure site bleeding after 2 Perclose ProGlides deployed, and complete device failure was defined as closure site bleeding which need surgical intervention
1day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Access-related complications
Time Frame: up to 24 hours after closure and during 30 days of follow-up.
events that occurred at the arterial access site, including periprocedural bleeding equiring transfusion, acute lower limb ischemia, groin infection, device failure, arterial thrombosis, arterial dissection, pseudoaneurysm, femoral arterial stenosis, arteriovenous fistula, hematoma, and lymphocele in the periprocedural period
up to 24 hours after closure and during 30 days of follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Subscribe