Group CST Using Zoom: A Proof of Concept Study

January 4, 2021 updated by: University College, London

Virtual CST - A Collaborative Proof of Concept Study With FaceCog HK in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic

People living with dementia (PLWD) often struggle to access services and treatment which may benefit their emotional and cognitive wellbeing, as well as disease progression. Transport provision; hospital access and restricted mobility are barriers that often deny people the opportunity to receive treatment in-line with NICE guidelines. Considering the current Covid-19 pandemic, hospital access and face-to-face treatment is even more limited at present; with services across the UK unable to offer their usual levels of care and support. This is particularly the case for people in vulnerable groups. Therefore, many services have been considering the potential of remote-access therapy, specifically the use of video-conferencing apps. During the covid-19 crisis and beyond, it is of urgent and practical need that we develop more accessible, innovative home-based group interventions to people with dementia that can be delivered remotely. A group at The University of Hong Kong, are undertaking a study entitled 'FaceCog' which involves the delivery of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) via the video-conferencing application 'Zoom'. CST is an established, evidence-based group intervention shown to improve quality of life and slow down cognitive deterioration in PLWD. In collaboration with the Hong Kong 'FaceCog' team, we propose to deliver a culturally adapted version of their Zoom-CST protocol in the UK in a proof of concept study during the current Covid-19 pandemic. The facecog Zoom-CST protocol is the first virtual CST protocol of its kind that we are aware of. It closely follows the original, evidence-based CST manual that was developed in the UK. It has been slightly adapted to make it useable on a virtual platform and to be culturally sensitive for use in Hong Kong. It incorporates all key elements and principles that have been evidenced to make the treatment effective. As we are delivering it in the UK, we will be using activities from the original manual, in place of the activities that have been adapted for the Hong Kong protocol. For example, we will use British phrases in the word games session rather than Chinese proverbs.

Data on recruitment, attrition, attendance data, focus groups, participant-completed session feedback forms and qualitative post-session interviews, will offer us the opportunity to assess intervention acceptability. Outcomes related to cognition, quality of life and mood will allow us to make inferences about the potential for clinical impacts of such an intervention. Engagement analysis will allow us to explore the potential barriers and facilitators to virtual-delivered CST for this population and highlight any potential adaptations to intervention which may be needed. This project is intended as a preliminary exploration which will pave the way for future intervention-modifications and pilot-studies which can evaluate the potential benefits of 'virtually'-delivered CST.

This research aims to:

  • Modify a pre-existing Zoom-CST protocol (FaceCog HK) to be culturally relevant and deliverable remotely within the UK.
  • Modify and develop resources for the groups, along with dementia-friendly 'how to' guides on using the chosen video-conferencing application.
  • Consult with stakeholders (including staff working within dementia care - clinical staff, charity organisations, and PLWD and their carers) about the potential foreseen barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of virtual-CST. Two remote, 'virtual' focus groups are proposed, one for professionals, and one for PLWD and/or informal carers.
  • Asses virtual CST's feasibility as guided by Orsmond and Cohn's (2015) discussion article on this topic, which identifies objectives of feasibility studies as, an evaluation of recruitment capability and sample characteristics, data collection procedures and outcome measures, the acceptability and suitability of the intervention and study procedures, the resources and ability to manage and implement the study and intervention, participants' responses to the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6BT
        • Recruiting
        • University College London
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Luke Perkins
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Cerne Felstead
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nur Diyanah Abdul Wahab
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wing Gi Leung

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Must have a clinical diagnosis of dementia and be within the 'mild-moderate' stages of disease progression.
  • Must be able to communicate verbally in English.
  • Must have capacity to consent to complete measures and to consent to video recording of the individual sessions.
  • Must have access to a device capable of video-conferencing and internet at home.
  • Must not be accessing any other psychosocial intervention (I.e. psychological therapy) at the time of participation

Exclusion criteria

  • Not having a clinical diagnosis of dementia or being within the 'moderate- sever' stages of disease progression
  • Not being able to communicate verbally in English
  • Not have the capacity to take consent to participation
  • Not have access to a device capable of video-conferencing and internet at home.
  • If the person is accessing any other psychosocial intervention (I.e. psychological therapy) at the time of participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Treatment as usual
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
Attendance at online CST groups
Participants will attend 14 x 1 hour online CST sessions that involve a variety of activities to stimulate the brain and focus on cognitive strengths based on a variety of themes i.e. childhood, using money, etc. This will aim to be multisensory and give choice and empowerment to participants. Benefits of face to face CST are shown to slow cognitive decline and improve quality of life. Adapting it for online use will investigate whether participants can still benefit in this way.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ADAS-Cog (adapted for virtual use) - change is being assessed
Time Frame: To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
Assessment of cognitive skills, used in dementia research
To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
MOCA blind- change is being assessed
Time Frame: To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
Cognitive screening tool
To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
Geriatric Depression Scale- change is being assessed
Time Frame: To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
Screen for depression in older adults
To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
QoL-AD- change is being assessed
Time Frame: To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention
Quality of Life questionnaire for use in dementia
To be completed within one week before and within one week after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post intervention interviews
Time Frame: Within 1 month post intervention
Qualitative date on experiences from the group
Within 1 month post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Online Cognitive Stimulation Therapy

Subscribe