Maintenance and Tissues Conditions of Fixed Screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis Versus Implant-Retained Ball Overdentures

January 12, 2021 updated by: Nourhan Ahmed Ragheb, Kafrelsheikh University

Prosthetic Maintenance and Peri- Implant Tissues Conditions of Fixed Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis Versus Implant-Retained Ball Overdentures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study was to compare the prosthetic maintenance requirements between implant-retained ball overdentures versus fixed screw- retained implant prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic changes in peri-implant tissue with using PGE2 as a PICF biomarker were also evaluated. Selected patients had been divided into two groups:

  1. Group (I): twenty seven patients had received implant-Supported ball over dentures.
  2. Group (II): twenty-seven patients had received screw retained restorations Interventions and study procedures

Surgical and prosthetic procedures:

Surgical Procedures A radiopaque radiographic stent was formed and was positioned in the patient's mouth during cone beam scanning. Four implants were planned with two virtual replicas, in the place of the lateral incisor and the second premolar.

The stent was fabricated. After the healing period of four months finished, the patients were recalled and the super structure was fabricated according to the type of restoration Follow-up During the 12 months follow-up period, prosthodontic complications were recorded and calculated.

Postoperative care Along with a conventional oral hygiene assessment and functional checkup, follow up visits were scheduled every 6 months and up to 12 months total follow up period.

Clinical soft tissue measurements which include plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and PPD were measured at the mid-facial, mid-lingual, mid-mesial, and mid-distal aspects of each fixture using a graduated plastic probe to the nearest 0.5 mm. These clinical measurements were recorded after prosthesis delivery, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) was assessed radiographically after prosthesis delivery, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

• Collection of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples: PICF was collected.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt, 33511
        • Faculty of Dentistry , Kafrelshiekh university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completely edentulous patients have Angle Class I maxilla-mandibular relationship.
  • Age range between 40 and 70.
  • Maxillary and mandibular ridges with no history of fresh extraction.
  • Sufficient bone volume to house four implants in each arch.
  • Sufficient zone of keratinized attached mucosa >5mm over the crest of the upper and lower ridges.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the patients have a past history of head and neck radiation
  • previous ridge augmentation or grafting
  • Lack of any systemic diseases that could affect osseointegration of implants as uncontrolled diabetes , hypertension , and osteoporosis
  • Heavy smokers who exceeding 20 cigarette/ day
  • para-functional habits for example bruxism or clenching.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: screw retained restorations
Hybrid prosthesis
Other: implant-retained ball overdentures
Removable prosthesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of prosthetic complications
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
changes in peri-implant tissue with using PGE2 as a PICF biomarker
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nourhan Ragheb, PhD, Kafrelsheikh University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KD/02/20

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prosthesis and Implant Dentistry

Clinical Trials on Screw retained restoration

3
Subscribe