Angulated Screw-retained Crowns Following Immediate Implant Placement

Clinical Evaluation of Cemented and Angulated Screw-retained Crowns Following Immediate Implant Placement: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

There are two choices of restorations and implant abutments connection now: cemented and screw-retained.The excess cement, which would be difficult to completely remove, might lead to series of biological complications. The angulated screw channel (ASC) abutments, which recently introduced by Nobel Biocare , largely address the problem with visible screw access that may compromise esthetics. However, all of the present studies were clinical reports, thus the clinical efficacy of ASC abutments still needs the verification of evidence-based medicine with larger sample. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled clinical trial study, aiming to verify the clinical efficacy of the ASC abutments by comparing screw-retained (with ASC abutments) single implant crowns with cemented ones in esthetic region.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200011
        • Shanghai NinthPeoples' Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years old and in good health;
  2. Single tooth implant (type 1) in the esthetic region;
  3. Patients with natural teeth adjacent to single implant crowns;
  4. Patients with periodontal treatment before implant surgery;
  5. The implants are from Nobel Biocare system with tapered link and the permanent restoration is a single crown and all-ceramic;
  6. Soft tissue in the implanting-and-adjacent areas is healthy and free of infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multiple implants in the esthetic region, or the restoration is a bridge
  2. Patients with bone augmentation procedures;
  3. Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes/day);
  4. Medically compromised patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III-IV);
  5. Implants in an incorrect three-dimensional position (definition according to ITI VOL1);
  6. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
  7. Unwilling to participate in the present study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Angulated screw-retained crown
Restorations are connected to the implants by angulated screw channel system
Implants are placed in fresh socket
To insert the restorations by angulated screw systems
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Cemented crown
Restorations are cemented onto the implant abutment
Implants are placed in fresh socket
To cement the restorations onto the implant abutment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BOP%
Time Frame: from baseline to 1-year follow-up
Percentage of bleeding on probing positive
from baseline to 1-year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PPD
Time Frame: from baseline to 1-year follow-up
Pocket probing depth
from baseline to 1-year follow-up
MBL
Time Frame: from baseline to 1-year follow-up
Marginal bone loss
from baseline to 1-year follow-up
PES
Time Frame: from baseline to 1-year follow-up
pink esthetic score
from baseline to 1-year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 17, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 20, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SH9-19-07

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Diseases

Clinical Trials on Immediate implant placement

Subscribe