Screw Retained Arch Bar Versus Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation

April 6, 2023 updated by: Mansoura University
A randomized prospective clinical study to compare screw Retained Arch Bar and Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

2) Patients with non-pathological favorable or non-favorable fracture of mandible or maxilla that can be treated by MMF when acceptable occlusion can be obtained via bimanual reduction will be divided randomly into two equal groups: Group I: 10 patients will receive conventional Erich's arch bar. Group II: 10 patients will receive modified screw retained arch bar.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patients age ranges from 18 to 50 years.
  2. Patients with non-pathological favorable or non-favorable fracture of mandible or maxilla that can be treated by MMF when acceptable occlusion can be obtained via bimanual reduction.
  3. Patients medically free from any systemic disease that absolutely contraindicate the surgical procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Edentulous ridge fracture. 2) Patients having primary and mixed dentition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional Erich's arch bar
• Patients will receive conventional Erich's arch bar
maxillomandibular fixation with conventional arch bar fixed to the teeth
Experimental: Screw Retained Arch Bar
patients will receive modified screw retained arch bar.
maxillomandibular fixation with bone screwed arch bar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of surgical procedure in minutes
Time Frame: intraoperative
Duration between the starting of fixation and complete fixation of fracture
intraoperative
maxillomandibular fixation stability in nominal scale(stable-unstable)
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
stability after fixation
immediately postoperative
maxillomandibular fixation stability in nominal scale(stable-unstable)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
stability after fixation
4-6 weeks
oral hygiene measuring with Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S)
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
the OHI-S values range from 0 to 6.OHI-S score is good between 0 and 1.2, medium between 1.3 and 3, and poor between 3.1 and 6.
immediately postoperative
oral hygiene measuring with Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
the OHI-S values range from 0 to 6.OHI-S score is good between 0 and 1.2, medium between 1.3 and 3, and poor between 3.1 and 6.
4-6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of iatrogenic injuries
Time Frame: intraoperative
iatrogenic injuries to teeth and gingiva
intraoperative
number of needle and wire stick injuries
Time Frame: intraoperative
injuries to the surgeon and the assistants.
intraoperative
pain assessment using numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
participants rated their pain on a scale from 0 to 10. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").
immediately postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures

Clinical Trials on conventional Erich's Arch Bar

Subscribe