- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05401994
Screw Retained Arch Bar Versus Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation
April 6, 2023 updated by: Mansoura University
A randomized prospective clinical study to compare screw Retained Arch Bar and Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
2) Patients with non-pathological favorable or non-favorable fracture of mandible or maxilla that can be treated by MMF when acceptable occlusion can be obtained via bimanual reduction will be divided randomly into two equal groups: Group I: 10 patients will receive conventional Erich's arch bar.
Group II: 10 patients will receive modified screw retained arch bar.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mansoura, Egypt, 35516
- Mansoura University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 50 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patients age ranges from 18 to 50 years.
- Patients with non-pathological favorable or non-favorable fracture of mandible or maxilla that can be treated by MMF when acceptable occlusion can be obtained via bimanual reduction.
- Patients medically free from any systemic disease that absolutely contraindicate the surgical procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1) Edentulous ridge fracture. 2) Patients having primary and mixed dentition.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: conventional Erich's arch bar
• Patients will receive conventional Erich's arch bar
|
maxillomandibular fixation with conventional arch bar fixed to the teeth
|
|
Experimental: Screw Retained Arch Bar
patients will receive modified screw retained arch bar.
|
maxillomandibular fixation with bone screwed arch bar
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
duration of surgical procedure in minutes
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
Duration between the starting of fixation and complete fixation of fracture
|
intraoperative
|
|
maxillomandibular fixation stability in nominal scale(stable-unstable)
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
|
stability after fixation
|
immediately postoperative
|
|
maxillomandibular fixation stability in nominal scale(stable-unstable)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
|
stability after fixation
|
4-6 weeks
|
|
oral hygiene measuring with Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S)
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
|
the OHI-S values range from 0 to 6.OHI-S score is good between 0 and 1.2, medium between 1.3 and 3, and poor between 3.1 and 6.
|
immediately postoperative
|
|
oral hygiene measuring with Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S)
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
|
the OHI-S values range from 0 to 6.OHI-S score is good between 0 and 1.2, medium between 1.3 and 3, and poor between 3.1 and 6.
|
4-6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
number of iatrogenic injuries
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
iatrogenic injuries to teeth and gingiva
|
intraoperative
|
|
number of needle and wire stick injuries
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
injuries to the surgeon and the assistants.
|
intraoperative
|
|
pain assessment using numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: immediately postoperative
|
participants rated their pain on a scale from 0 to 10.
The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g.
"no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g.
"pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").
|
immediately postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 29, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
June 2, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 10, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 6, 2023
Last Verified
May 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A03080921
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular Fracture | Virtual Plan of Mandibular FractureEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular FractureEgypt
-
Suez Canal UniversityRecruitingMandibular Fracture TreatmentEgypt
-
Mohamed abdelsalam Gaber elkhoulyNot yet recruitingMandibular Class Iv Fractures
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedMandibular Angle FractureEgypt
-
Suez Canal UniversityActive, not recruitingMandibular Fracture TreatmentEgypt
-
Stryker CraniomaxillofacialCompletedMandible Fracture | Mandibular ReconstructionGermany, United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreNot yet recruitingNeurosensory Disturbance | Mandibular Body FracturesPakistan
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedT-prf Versus T-prf and Low-level Laser Stimulation on Bone Healing at Posterior Mandibular FracturesPosterior Mandibular FracturesEgypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
Clinical Trials on conventional Erich's Arch Bar
-
HITEC-Institute of Medical SciencesCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedImmediate Provisional ProsthesisEgypt
-
Maisa Mohamed Farid ShaabanNot yet recruitingEdentulous Mandible | Implant-Supported OverdenturesEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
Amany IbrahimCompleted
-
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityCompletedAcute Stanford Type A Aortic DissectionChina
-
University of MalayaUnknownTranspalatal Arch (TPA) | Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) | Oral Health Impact Profile Short Version 14 (OHIP 14) | Orthodontic Pain | Three Dimensional (3D) Orthodontic DeviceMalaysia
-
October 6 UniversityNot yet recruitingTruness of Impression Techniques in All on x Cases | Trueness of Full Arch Implant Prosthesis ImpressionEgypt
-
October 6 UniversityNot yet recruitingPassive Fit of Full-arch Implant Prostheses
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaNot yet recruitingMaxillofacial InjuriesMalaysia