Adherence Improving Self-Management Strategy (AIMS) in Breast Cancer Patients Using Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment (AET)

January 18, 2021 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Adherence Improving Self-Management Strategy (AIMS) in Breast Cancer Patients Using Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment (AET): a Randomised Controlled Trial

Background of the study:

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Dutch women. Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) substantially improves chances for survival after primary breast cancer. In practice, many women experience difficulties to adhere to treatment: besides missing single or multiple doses of medication, up to 50% of patients stop treatment prematurely due to decreased treatment motivation over time and burden of side effects. Together with patients and health care professionals, we adapted a cost-effective behavior change intervention (AIMS) for women using adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer to an add-on module in regular follow up care.

Objective of the study:

The primary aim of this study is to pilot test the feasibility of the AIMS-AET intervention versus usual treatment on medication adherence in breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy. Intervention effects on psychosocial determinants and user experiences will be evaluated. The feasibility of testing the AIMS-AET intervention in a bigger RCT will be assessed. The secondary objective is to assess (preliminary) intervention effects on adherence, physical activity and on quality of life.

Study design:

A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing AIMS AET to usual care with an extensive mixed-methods process evaluation.

Study population:

Female outpatients of 2 Dutch hospitals with a prescription for adjuvant endocrine therapy after primary breast cancer. Intervention (if applicable):

An in-person delivered intervention imbedded in regular follow-up care during 9-months. Patients will receive an electronic monitoring System to track medication intake and a pedometer to count daily amount of steps. During the baseline visit, the health care professional (HCP) will use pre-tested materials for informing and motivating patients; and collaboratively set goals and plans for medication adherence and physical activity. During regular follow-up consultations with the HCP, personalized visual reports of medication intake and amount of steps will be evaluated to enhance patients awareness of their (non-)adherence and (in)activity and identify any problems and solutions to reduce undesired behaviour. The control group will receive usual treatment only.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Uden, Netherlands, 5406 PT
        • Recruiting
        • Bernhoven
        • Contact:
          • Joris van Extel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female gender
  • estrogen receptor positive
  • diagnosis of primary breast cancer and active prescription of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors
  • Not being treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy earlier (except voor neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy)
  • started with adjuvant endocrine therapy in the last 4 weeks OR already taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (>=3 months; remaining treatment duration minimal 2 years)
  • age minimal 18 years
  • Able to come to the outpatient ward of the hospital for appointments with the nurse or nurse practitioner
  • Able to understand Dutch or having the possibility to bring someone who translates

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to sign informed consent.
  • Currently being treated with neo adjuvant endocrine therapy
  • distant metastases proven by a positron emission tomograph (PET) scan with fluordeoxyglucose (FDG) scan
  • Other invasive malignancy, except for a malignancy being treated without chemotherapy more than 5 years ago and without evidence for recurrence. Patients with basal cell or plaveisel cell skin cancer are eligible for the study.
  • Participation in another interventional study for adherence or physical activity
  • Treatment with ovarian suppression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention treatment experienced patients
AIMS
An in-person delivered intervention imbedded in regular follow-up care during 9-months. Patients will receive an electronic monitoring System to track medication intake and a pedometer to count daily amount of steps. During the baseline visit, the health care professional (HCP) will use pre-tested materials for informing and motivating patients; and collaboratively set goals and plans for medication adherence and physical activity. During regular follow-up consultations with the HCP, personalized visual reports of medication intake and amount of steps will be evaluated to enhance patients awareness of their (non-)adherence and (in)activity and identify any problems and solutions to reduce undesired behaviour. The control group will receive usual treatment only.
Experimental: Intervention starting patients
AIMS
An in-person delivered intervention imbedded in regular follow-up care during 9-months. Patients will receive an electronic monitoring System to track medication intake and a pedometer to count daily amount of steps. During the baseline visit, the health care professional (HCP) will use pre-tested materials for informing and motivating patients; and collaboratively set goals and plans for medication adherence and physical activity. During regular follow-up consultations with the HCP, personalized visual reports of medication intake and amount of steps will be evaluated to enhance patients awareness of their (non-)adherence and (in)activity and identify any problems and solutions to reduce undesired behaviour. The control group will receive usual treatment only.
Other: Control group treatment experienced patients
Regular care
Treatment as usual (appointments with nurse/nurse practioner with regular content)
Other: Control group starting patients
Regular care
Treatment as usual (appointments with nurse/nurse practioner with regular content)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention effects on psychosocial determinants (beliefs, motivation, social norm)
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
degree of agreement with statements about beliefs and motivation towards treatment and social norm assessed with a self-developed questionnaire
change from baseline at 12 months
Intervention effects on self-efficacy
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
degree of agreement with statements about self-efficacy regarding treatment measured with the Self Efficacy of Appropriate Medication use Scale (SEAMS) and additional self-developed items. Higher scores indicated higher levels of self-efficacy for medication adherence.
change from baseline at 12 months
Delivery of the intervention in everyday context
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quantitative assessement of intervention steps and content measured with a self-developed checklist for health care professionals
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Satisfaction of HCPs with the intervention
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Qualitative assessment (semi-structured interviews) measuring to which extend HCPs perceive the intervention as acceptable practical and sustainable
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Satisfaction of patients with the intervention
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Qualitative assessment (semi-structured interviews) measuring patient experiences with the intervention regarding acceptability and feasibility
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
(preliminary) intervention effects on adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
days of missed medication
1 year
(preliminary) intervention effects on physical activity
Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 and 12 months
assessing habitual activity with the Short Questionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). Higher scores indicate more time spended on habitual physical activity.
change from baseline at 6 and 12 months
(preliminary) intervention effects on quality of life
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES). Higher values reflect a better quality of life.
change from baseline at 12 months
(preliminary) intervention effects on social support
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
assessed with the Sociale Steun Lijst - Discrepanties (SSL-D). A higher score indicates a higher lack of social support.
change from baseline at 12 months
(preliminary) intervention effects on self-management
Time Frame: change from baseline at 12 months
assessed with the Patient Activiation Measurement (PAM-13). A higher score indicates a higher level of self-management.
change from baseline at 12 months
Treatment as usual
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Treatment as usual will be assessed by the Treatment as usual questionnaire (an open ended questionnaire) in HCPs
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Satisfaction of patients with usual care
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants of the control group about their experiences of delivered care
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL74126.091.20

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Adherence Improving self-Management Strategy

Subscribe