Metabolic Therapy Program In Conjunction With Standard Treatment For Glioblastoma

April 5, 2026 updated by: Waikato Hospital

Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of a Metabolic Therapy Program in Conjunction With Standard Treatment for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM), a very aggressive brain tumour, is one of the most malignant of all cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. The majority of GBM cells display damaged mitochondria (the "batteries" of cells), so they rely on an alternate method for producing energy called the Warburg Effect, which relies nearly exclusively on glucose (in contrast, normal cells can use other molecules, such as fatty acids and fat-derived ketones, for energy). Metabolic interventions, such as fasting and ketogenic diets, target cancer cell metabolism by enhancing mitochondria function, decreasing blood glucose levels, and increasing blood ketone levels, creating an advantage for normal cells but a disadvantage for cancer cells. Preliminary experience at Waikato Hospital has shown that a metabolic therapy program (MTP) utilizing fasting and ketogenic diets is feasible and safe in people with advanced cancer, and may provide a therapeutic benefit. We aim to determine whether using an MTP concurrently with standard oncological treatment (chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy) is feasible and safe in patients with GBM, and has treatment outcomes consistent with greater overall treatment efficacy than in published trials.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Gliomas are tumours that originate from glial cells in the central nervous system. The most common histological subtype is GBM, which accounts for nearly 50% of all malignant brain tumours. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, the median survival for GBM is poor (8-15 months).

Although cancer is regarded as a genetic disease, it may be perceived as a metabolic disorder. The majority of human cancers, including GBM, display low numbers of mitochondria, most of which are structurally damaged, resulting in defective cell respiration. To compensate, cancer cells greatly increase their uptake of glucose, which is fermented (regardless of oxygen concentration, a process known as the Warburg Effect) to generate energy. Cancer cells also rely on increased growth signaling pathways involving insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and mammalian target of rapamycin to support their unbridled growth and proliferation. Cancer cells may therefore be vulnerable to interventions that selectively target their abnormal metabolism.

Metabolic interventions, such as fasting and ketogenic diets, target cancer cell metabolism and may be effective alongside standard treatments in advanced cancers. Fasting is a voluntary abstinence from food and drink for a controlled period of time (typically, 12 hours to 3 weeks in humans), whereas ketogenic diets are high-fat, adequate-protein, low-carbohydrate diets that stimulate the body to create a fasting-like metabolic state. Fasting and ketogenic diets stimulate mitochondria biogenesis, decrease blood glucose, increase liver production of fat-derived ketones (which serve as a major alternative energy source for most normal cells within the body, but cannot be utilized by cancer cells), and decrease growth factor availability. Thus, fasting and ketogenic diets provide an advantage for normal cells but a disadvantage to cancer cells by enhancing mitochondria biogenesis and function, depriving cancer cells of their major fuel, and creating a cell environment unfavourable for unbridled growth and proliferation.

Preliminary experience at Waikato Hospital has shown that a metabolic therapy program (MTP) consisting of fasting and/or a ketogenic diet is feasible, safe, and may be effective in patients with advanced cancer, including GBM. In a recent case report, a metabolic strategy (7-day fast every 1-2 months, with a ketogenic diet between fasts) resulted in the near-complete regression of a stage IVA metastatic thymoma after 2 years. Moreover, we are currently observing 8 glioblastoma patients who voluntarily consented to undergo fasting and ketogenic diet therapy in a manner similar to what we propose to use in this study; at an average of 4-5 months, all patients have completed the fasts and adhered to their ketogenic diet, experiencing only mild adverse effects.

On this background, we aim to determine whether using an MTP concurrently with standard oncological treatment (chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy) is feasible and safe, and has treatment outcomes consistent with greater overall treatment efficacy than in published trials, in patients with GBM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Waikato Region
      • Hamilton, Waikato Region, New Zealand, 3204
        • Waikato Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or greater.
  2. Newly-diagnosed histologically-confirmed GBM.
  3. ECOG Performance Status 0-2.
  4. Planned for 6 weeks of standard chemoradiation for GBM.
  5. If receiving dexamethasone, the dose must be ≤ 4 mg daily (and not increasing) upon commencement of the MTP.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ineligible for standard treatment for GBM due to poor performance status, co-morbidities, or inability to give informed consent.
  2. Type 1 diabetes.
  3. A medical or psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigators, would make it unlikely that the patient could adhere to the MTP.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standard treatment in conjunction with MTP

Standard:

  • Concurrent chemoradiation - Radiation (60-Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) with daily oral temozolomide.
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy - Daily oral temozolomide (5 days per 4-week cycle, starting 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiation, with at least 6 cycles intended).

MTP:

- Two 5-day fasts (allowing water, salt, tea, coffee, and a magnesium supplement) during chemoradiation followed by a 5-day fast during each adjuvant chemotherapy cycle, with a time-restricted modified ketogenic diet (one or two 1-hour eating windows per day, allowing oils, meats, vegetables, nuts, seeds, limited berries, and a multivitamin) between fasts.

See description under "Arms."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio during chemoradiation
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Proportion of patients able to sustain functional ketosis (defined as a mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio of ≤6) during chemoradiation (defined as the beginning of the first fast through to 3 weeks following completion of chemoradiation)
9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio during adjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of patients able to sustain functional ketosis during adjuvant chemotherapy (defined as the beginning of the first adjuvant chemotherapy fast through to completion of adjuvant chemotherapy)
24 weeks
Mean daily blood glucose-to-ketone ratio during the MTP, calculated separately on fasting and ketogenic diet days
Time Frame: 33 weeks
Proportion of patients able to sustain functional ketosis during the MTP (defined as the beginning of chemoradiation through to the end of adjuvant chemotherapy), calculated separately each fasting and ketogenic diet phase
33 weeks
Change in weight
Time Frame: 33 weeks
Weight (kg)
33 weeks
Safety as measured by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4)
Time Frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Number of adverse events (of any grade)
After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Change in performance status as measured by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale
Time Frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale (scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating lower performance status)
After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Change in leisure/exercise activity as measured by Godin Leisure-Time Exercise questionnaire
Time Frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise questionnaire (scores range from 0 to no maximum, with higher scores indicating higher leisure/exercise activity)
After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Change in quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain questionnaire
Time Frame: After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 200, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life)
After each week (7 days) during chemoradiation, then after cycle 1 (28 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy, then after every 2 cycles (56 days) of adjuvant chemotherapy
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: From date of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis to date of first documented progression, whichever came first, up to 33 weeks
Progression-free survival
From date of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis to date of first documented progression, whichever came first, up to 33 weeks
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis to date of death from any cause, whichever came first, up to 33 weeks
Overall survival
From date of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis to date of death from any cause, whichever came first, up to 33 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew CL Phillips, FRACP, Waikato Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RD020132
  • U1111-1262-0203 (Other Identifier: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform)
  • Grant #321 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Waikato Medical Research Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon reasonable request for research purposes only, de-identified patient data may be shared with other investigators.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting immediately upon publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon reasonable request for research purposes.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioblastoma

Clinical Trials on Standard Treatment Plus Metabolic Therapy Program

Subscribe