Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain (AuriMod)

March 9, 2022 updated by: Aurimod GmbH

Personalized Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

One in five people in the general adult population suffer from chronic pain, a figure that is higher than heart disease, cancer, and diabetes combined. A majority of these patients is suffering from chronic back pain. Conventional treatment options offer only a partial response, with many people continuing to suffer severe chronic pain, despite receiving several treatments.

Non-pharmacological treatments by neuromodulation represent a promising treatment modality for these patients. For instance, spinal cord stimulation blocks pain signals travelling to the brain, but requires implantation near the spine with significant clinical risks. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is another neuromodulation modality proposed to alleviate chronic pain. Conventional VNS devices are implanted under the skin on the chest and the electrodes are wired to the left vagus nerve in the neck. However, aside from implantation risks, VNS is often associated with side effects such as swallowing difficulties, due to unwanted stimulation of motoric vagus nerve branches in the neck.

Percutaneous auricular VNS (pVNS) is an emerging technology for stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve in the pinna of the ear. Specific electrical impulses are applied via three miniature needle electrodes located in the auricle near sensory vagus nerve fibers. Scientific data show that pVNS modulates brain circuits involved in autonomic control and pain processing. pVNS has shown positive effects in chronic low-back pain patients, in a sustainable way with a low side-effect profile. However, the optimal settings of stimulation with regards to personalization remain to be elucidated.

The present prospective, open, randomized, controlled pilot study aims at evaluating the performance of pVNS treatment, using a small wearable stimulation device (AuriMod CT01), comparing personalized and non-personalized stimulation paradigms in patients with chronic low-back pain. Patients will be randomized in one of the following treatment groups (1) Group A: Stimulation with personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude, (2) Group B: Stimulation with personalized stimulation amplitude, (3) Group C: Stimulation without personalization (comparator group).

Patients will be treated for 8 weeks. Patients will receive standardized pain medication including rescue medication in parallel. An additional follow-up period of 12 weeks allows to evaluate sustainable and late-time effects of treatment. Patients will use a therapy management system to monitor outcome.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Carinthia
      • Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria, 9020
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Worthersee
        • Contact:
          • Rudolf Likar, Univ.Prof. Dr.
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1217
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital de la Tour
        • Contact:
          • Christophe Perruchoud, PD Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged 18 to 65 years at screening
  • Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures
  • Chronic back pain with or without leg pain (CBLP) persisting for at least 3 months
  • A minimum of 70 (out of 180) points on the Computer User Self-Efficacy Scale at the screening visit
  • Patient is constant with respect to pain treatment during the screening phase
  • A daily average VAS >= 4 on at least half of the days in the screening phase
  • Compliance with the daily status reporting requirements as demonstrated by having valid required data entries for all days. It is acceptable if data of one day is missing in the screening phase

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with age under 18
  • Hemophilia
  • Infection, eczema, or psoriasis at application site
  • Numbed and desensitized skin at the application site
  • Florid malignant diseases
  • Mental and physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device
  • The presence of a cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, or other active implantable device
  • Vagal hypersensitivity
  • Indication for back surgery
  • High-grade spinal stenosis
  • Patients with other active implants
  • Patients with autonomic disorders
  • Patients with diabetes type I or II
  • Patients taking Beta-Blockers
  • Patients taking drugs carrying the potential risk of arrhythmia (tricyclic medications, Alzheimer drugs, etc.)
  • Clinically significant hip or knee arthritis
  • Allergy against rescue medication used during the study
  • History of Vagus Nerve Stimulation
  • Pregnant or nursing female patients
  • Patients with arrhythmia, bradycardia, other rhythm disorders or any other clinically significant cardiac anomalies detected during ECG at screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Personalized stimulation parameters and amplitude
AuriMod CT01 is a wearable medical device for personalised pain treatment through auricular vagus nerve stimulation. AuriMod CT01 is a battery-operated electrical stimulation device, to be placed behind the ear on the neck. AuriMod CT01 connects to three needle electrodes, which are placed in vagally innervated regions of the auricle. It emits electrical signals with a personalized set of stimulation parameters and adjustable amplitude.
Experimental: Group B
Personalized stimulation amplitude
AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and adjustable stimulation amplitude.
Active Comparator: Group C
Non-personalized stimulation
AuriMod CT01 with a fixed set of stimulation parameters and amplitude.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average VAS
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change from baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain) during the last 24 hours before the visit
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Max/Min VAS
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Change from baseline to EoT in max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
8 weeks
Average/Max/Min VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change from baseline to End of Follow-Up in average/max/min VAS
20 weeks
Normalized average/max/min VAS (scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Baseline-adjusted area under the max/min/average VAS from baseline to EoT
8 weeks
VAS (follow-up; scale 0-10, steps 0.1, 0...no pain, 10...worst pain)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
VAS during follow-up
12 weeks
Medication use
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase
20 weeks
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change in heart rate over therapy and follow-up
20 weeks
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change in heart rate variability over therapy and follow-up
20 weeks
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change in blood pressure over therapy and follow-up
20 weeks
Patient motility
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Change in daily step count over therapy and follow-up
20 weeks
painDETECT
Time Frame: 20 weeks
painDETECT questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
20 weeks
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 20 weeks
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire over treatment and follow-up
20 weeks
HADS
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) over treatment and follow-up
20 weeks
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Sleep quality (5-item questionnaire) over treatment and follow-up
20 weeks
Wellbeing
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Subjective wellbeing (on a 3-point ordinal scale: good, medium, bad)
20 weeks
Perception Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
AuriMod CT01 Perception Scale evaluating the quality of stimulation perception in a 10-item questionnaire at EoT
8 weeks
Usability Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
AuriMod CT01 Usability scoring using the System Usability Scale (10-item scale from 10-50, 10...worst usability, 50...best usability) at EoT
8 weeks
Socioeconomic data
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Socioeconomic data change over treatment and follow-up
20 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Outcome 1
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Device Deficiencies (DDs) observed until EoT
8 weeks
Safety Outcome 2
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and related AEs observed until end of follow-up
20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rudolf Likar, Univ.-Prof. Dr., Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Feschingstrasse 11, 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Perruchoud, PD Dr., Clinique de la Douleur, Hopital de La Tour, Avenue Jacob-Daniel Maillard 3, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AT-MF-000000433-CIV-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Subscribe