SMARTHEART Validation Study

February 10, 2021 updated by: University of Leicester

SMARTHEART Validation Study. A Study to Assess the Accuracy and Validate Novel Smartphone and Wearable ECG Devices in Cardiovascular Patients

To compare the accuracy of novel smartphone or wearable ECG devices to a gold standard ECG in patients with normal and abnormal ECGs.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Assess the effect of the following on the accuracy of the recorded ECG compared to a gold standard ECG:

  • Posture or position of the patient
  • Movement
  • Amount of hair on the ECG site
  • Skin condition (tone/dryness) Ability to detect a paced rhythm accurately A qualitative assessment of ECG devices, including the amount of artefact in the signal and ease of use of the device

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

128

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Leicestershire
      • Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, LE3 9QP
        • Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited from cardiology wards across the University Hospitals of Leicester trust.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Must have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English
  • Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with study requirements.
  • Must be over 18 years of age
  • Must be deemed clinically stable by their direct care team.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who do not have an adequate understanding of written and spoken English
  • Patients who are medically unstable, as defined by the patient's direct care team.
  • Patients who are unable to give informed consent
  • Patients who are deemed clinically unstable by their direct care team

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of smartphone or wearable ECG devices compared to gold standard ECG devices
Time Frame: 2 hours
To compare the accuracy of novel smartphone or wearable ECG devices to a gold standard ECG in patients with normal and abnormal ECGs.
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: - Posture or position of the patient
Time Frame: 2 hours
Assessment of changes to the ECG signal due to posture or position of the patient
2 hours
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Movement
Time Frame: 2 hours
Assessment of changes to the ECG signal due to movement of the patient
2 hours
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Amount of hair on the ECG site
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of changes to the ECG signal due to amount of hair on the site of ECG electrode positions
12 months
Assessing the effects on the ECG of: • Skin condition (tone/dryness)
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of changes to the ECG signal due to different skin conditions on the site of ECG electrode positions
12 months
Ability to detect a paced rhythm accurately.
Time Frame: 2 hours
Assessment of ability of ECG device to detect paced ECG complexes or pacing spikes
2 hours
A qualitative assessment of ECG devices, including the amount of artefact in the signal and ease of use of the device.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: G. Andre Ng, University of Leicester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0693

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Subscribe