Validation of User Needs of the Point Digit With Partial Hand Amputees

September 17, 2024 updated by: Point Designs
The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Digit system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial hand amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus
      • Lafayette, Colorado, United States, 80026
        • Point Designs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Partial hand amputees with absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
  • Fluent in English
  • Individuals aged 18 or greater

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon occupational therapist evaluation
  • Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prosthesis
Patient is temporarily fit with Point Digit partial hand prosthetic system
The Point Digit partial hand prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical digits and a mounting bracket

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (8 hours)
User wears Point Digit(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be comfortable for a full day's use. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (8 hours)
VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User flexes and extends the Point Digit(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User lifts a 25 lb. bag with Point Digit(s) (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User grips a hammer with Point Digit(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User releases Point Digit(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be releasable while performing active grasps. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User positions Point Digit(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User grips a 5 lb. cylindrical smooth object using Point Digit(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have high grip surface friction. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have a pronounced fingernail. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (8 hours)
User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be robustly attached to mounting system. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (8 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 253922
  • R42HD097827 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation; Traumatic, Hand

Clinical Trials on Point Digit

Subscribe