- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04763278
Validation of User Needs of the Point Digit With Partial Hand Amputees
September 17, 2024 updated by: Point Designs
The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Digit system.
This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial hand amputees will be asked to perform several tasks.
Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need.
Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
7
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus
-
Lafayette, Colorado, United States, 80026
- Point Designs
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Partial hand amputees with absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
- Fluent in English
- Individuals aged 18 or greater
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon occupational therapist evaluation
- Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Prosthesis
Patient is temporarily fit with Point Digit partial hand prosthetic system
|
The Point Digit partial hand prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical digits and a mounting bracket
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (8 hours)
|
User wears Point Digit(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be comfortable for a full day's use.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (8 hours)
|
|
VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User flexes and extends the Point Digit(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User lifts a 25 lb.
bag with Point Digit(s) (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User grips a hammer with Point Digit(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User releases Point Digit(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be releasable while performing active grasps.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User positions Point Digit(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User grips a 5 lb.
cylindrical smooth object using Point Digit(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have high grip surface friction.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall have a pronounced fingernail.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (10 minutes)
|
|
VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test
Time Frame: Day 1 (8 hours)
|
User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail).
This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Digit has been met: Point Digit shall be robustly attached to mounting system.
A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant.
An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success.
Each participant attended a single-day experimental session.
A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Digits were mounted to the socket.
Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
|
Day 1 (8 hours)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 7, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 30, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
March 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 17, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
February 21, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 27, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2024
Last Verified
September 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 253922
- R42HD097827 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Amputation; Traumatic, Hand
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingAmputation; Traumatic, Hand, and Wrist | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand, at Wrist LevelUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of AlbertaActive, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, LimbUnited States
-
Boninger, Michael, MDNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Ripple Therapeutics...RecruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Össur Iceland ehfCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Limb; Absence, Congenital, UpperUnited States
-
Point DesignsUniversity of Colorado, DenverCompletedAmputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
-
Martin BerliBern University of Applied SciencesCompletedAmputation; Traumatic, HandSwitzerland
-
Point DesignsUniversity of Colorado, Denver; National Institute of Neurological Disorders... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingAmputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...RecruitingAmputation; Traumatic, HandCanada
-
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal...RecruitingAmputation; Traumatic, HandCanada
-
Point DesignsUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Arm DynamicsCompletedAmputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
Clinical Trials on Point Digit
-
Point DesignsUniversity of Colorado, Denver; Arm DynamicsCompletedAmputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
-
Brain and Cognition Discovery FoundationTakeda; Cognition Kit; Ctrl Group, LtdCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineTerminatedGynecologic CancerUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompleted
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedWaterpipe SmokingIsrael
-
Nigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityCompletedSleep | Joint Hypermobility | Androgen Effect | Healty Controls | HormonalTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinActive, not recruitingDigit Tip Wound | Split Skin Donor SiteGermany
-
University of Colorado, DenverColorado School of Public HealthRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis | Clinically Isolated Syndrome | Biomarkers | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Radiologically Isolated SyndromeUnited States
-
Università degli Studi dell'InsubriaUnknownPostoperative Cognitive DysfunctionItaly
-
Nigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityRecruitingInfant Developmental AssessmentTurkey (Türkiye)