- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04770272
Study to Compare a Mono Atezolizumab Window Followed by a Atezolizumab - CTX Therapy With Atezolizumab - CTX Therapy (neoMono)
An Adaptive Randomized Neoadjuvant Two Arm Trial in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Comparing a Mono Atezolizumab Window Followed by a Atezolizumab - CTX Therapy With Atezolizumab - CTX Therapy (neoMono)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, open-label, adaptive, two arm, multicenter phase II trial that enrolled female and male patients with primary TNBC (defined as ER/PR < 10% and HER2-negative) with tumor stages cT1c - cT4d (cN0 and cN+). Patients are randomized to Arm A and B. Randomization is stratified by PD-L1 expression on immune cells (IC-status) and anatomic tumor stage (according to the AJCC 8th edition Anatomic Stage Groups I, II andIII). PD-L1 status is determined by central pathology using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay and is defined by PD-L1 IC expression.
Patients in Arm A receive a 2-week monotherapy of Atezolizumab 840 mg q2w prior to initiation of a 12-week neoadjuvant CTX therapy with Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 i.v. q1w x 12 doses + Carboplatin AUC of 2 i.v. q1w x 12 doses + Atezolizumab 1200 mg day 1 every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by Epirubicin 90 mg/m2 + Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, both q3w for 4 cycles + Atezolizumab 1200 mg day 1 every 3 weeks for 4 doses.
Patients in Arm B are treated with a neoadjuvant 12-week regimen of Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² i.v. q1w x 12 doses + Carboplatin AUC of 2 i.v. q1w x 12 doses + Atezolizumab 1200 mg day 1 every 3 weeks for 4 doses without a monotherapy window. This is followed by Epirubicin 90 mg/m² + Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, both q3w for 4 cycles + Atezolizumab 1200 mg day 1 every 3 weeks for 4 doses.
Patients in both arms undergo surgery after 29 - 30 weeks therapy in total for Arm A and 27 - 28 weeks therapy in total for Arm B (3 - 4 weeks after last dose of neoadjuvant therapy).
Safety and toxicities under therapy are supervised via regular DSMB meetings. After surgery, patients are treated according to the local SoC therapy for TNBC and followed-up for 24 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bottrop, Germany, 46236
- Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH; Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe;
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female and male patients, age at diagnosis 18 years and above
- Written informed consent prior to admission to this study
- Histologically confirmed unilateral primary invasive carcinoma of the breast
- Clinical T1c - T4d
- Stage N0-N3 until 21 patients (5%) with stage N3 are randomized, thereafter N0-N2
Triple negative breast cancer defined by and confirmed by central pathology:
- ER negative (<10% positive cells in IHC) and PR negative (<10% positive cells on IHC)
HER2 negative breast cancer:
- Either defined by IHC: ICH scores of 0-1 or an ICH score of 2 in combination with a negative in-situ-hybridization (ISH)
- Or defined by ISH: negative ISH
- Identifiable PD-L1 IC-status by central pathology (positive or negative) by means of VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay; positive status is defined by PD-L1 expression on IC on ≥ 1% of the tumor area, negative status is defined by PD-L1 expression on IC on < 1% of the tumor area
- No clinical evidence for distant metastasis (cM0)
- Tumor block available for translational research
- Performance Status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 1 or KI ≥ 80 %
- Negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days prior to screening in premenopausal patients
Women of childbearing potential and male patients with partners of childbearing potential must accept to implement a highly effective (less than 1% failure rate according to Pearl index) including at least one non-hormonal contraceptive measures during the study treatment and for 5 months following the last dose of study treatment such as:
- Intrauterine device (IUD)
- bilateral tubal occlusion
- vasectomized partner
- sexual abstinence
- The patient must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
Normal cardiac function:
- Normal electrocardiogram (ECG) (within 6 weeks prior to screening)
- Normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on echocardiorgraphy
Normal thyroid function
o Normal TSH and FT4
Blood counts within 14 days prior screening:
- absolute neutrophile count (ANC) must be ≥ 1,500/mm3
- Platelet count must be ≥ 100,000 / mm3
- Hemoglobin must be ≥ 10 g/dl
Hepatic functions:
- Total bilirubin must be ≤ 1 upper limit of normal (ULN) for the lab unless the patient has a bilirubin elevation > 1 x ULN to 1.5 x ULN due to Gilbert's disease or similar syndrome involving slow conjugation of bilirubin
- Alkaline phosphatase must be ≤ 2.5 x ULN for the lab
- AST and ALT must be ≤1.5 x ULN for the lab.
- Patients with AST and ALT or alkaline phosphatase > 1 x ULN are eligible for inclusion if liver imaging (computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET-CT, or PET scan) performed within 3 months prior to randomization (and part of standard of care) does not demonstrate metastatic disease and the requirements in criterion (just above) are met
- Patients with alkaline phosphatase that is > 1 x ULN but less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN or with unexplained bone pain are eligible if bone imaging does not demonstrate metastatic disease.
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 40 ml/min performed 28 days prior to screening
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous history of malign diseases, non-melanoma skin cancer and carcinoma of the cervix are allowed if treated with curative intent
- Any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that, in the investigator's opinion, gives reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide or Atezolizumab
- Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical conditions that do not permit compliance with the study protocol
- Concurrent treatment with other drugs that are contraindicating the use of the study drugs
- Existing pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- Sequential breast cancer
- Concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs and participation in another clinical trial or clinical research project (except registry study) within 30 days prior to study entry
Severe and relevant co-morbidity that would interact with the application of cytotoxic agents or the participation in the study including but not confined to:
- Uncompensated chronic heart failure or systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 55%, congestive heart failure (CHF) New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II-IV),
- unstable arrhythmias requiring treatment i.e., atrial tachycardia with a heart rate ≥ 100/bpm at rest, significant ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia) or higher grade AV-block,
- Angina pectoris within the last 6 months requiring anti-anginal medication,
- Clinically significant valvular heart disease,
- Evidence of myocardial infarction on electrocardiogram (ECG),
- Poorly controlled hypertension (e.g., systolic > 180 mmHg or diastolic > 100 mmHg).
Inadequate organ function including but not confined to:
- hepatic impairment as defined by bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN
- pulmonary disease (severe dyspnea at rest requiring oxygen therapy)
Abnormal blood values:
- Platelet count below 100,000/mm3
- AST/ALT > 1.5 x ULN
- Hypokalaemia > CTCAE grade 1
- Neutropenia > CTCAE grade 1
- Anaemia > CTCAE grade 1
- Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks before cycle 1 day 1 or anticipation that such a vaccine will be required during the study
- Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medications (including but not limited to interferons, IL-2) within 28 days or 5 half-lives of the drug, whichever is longer, prior to randomization.
- Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medications (including but not limited to Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide, Azathioprine, Methotrexate, Thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis [anti-TNF] factor agents) within 14 days prior to screening or anticipation of need for systemic immunosuppressive medications during the study
- Patients with prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation
Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency, including but not limited to myasthenia gravis, myositis, autoimmune hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, Wegener granulomatosis, Sjögren syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or multiple sclerosis with the following exceptions:
- Patients with a history of autoimmune-related hypothyroidism on a stable dose of thyroid replacement hormone may be eligible for this study.
- Patients with controlled Type 1 diabetes mellitus on a stable dose of insulin regimen may be eligible for this study.
- Patients with eczema, psoriasis, lichen simplex chronicus, or vitiligo with dermatologic manifestations only (e.g., patients with psoriatic arthritis are excluded) are permitted provided all of following conditions are met: Rash must cover < 10% of body surface area; Disease is well controlled at baseline and requires only low-potency topical corticosteroids; No occurrence of acute exacerbations of the underlying condition requiring psoralen plus ultraviolet A radiation, Methotrexate, retinoids, biologic agents, oral calcineurin inhibitors, or high-potency or oral Corticosteroids within the previous 12 months.
- History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia (e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans), drug-induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan.
- History of HIV infection, hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
- Patients with significant cardiovascular disease
- Patients with inadequate hematological and end-organ function
- Patients receiving therapeutic anti-coagulants
- Stage N3, as soon as 21 patients with stage N3 are randomized
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm A
2 weeks Atezolizumab monotherapy before biopsy, followed by a 12-week therapy with Paclitaxel + Carboplatin+ Atezolizumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
This will be followed by Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + Atezolizumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
|
840 mg Day 1 for two weeks
Other Names:
1200 mg Day 1 every 3 weeks for 8 cycles
Other Names:
Dosing according to Area Under the Curve of 2 Intravenous weekly x 12 cycles
Other Names:
Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly x 12 cycles
Other Names:
90 mg/m2, day 1 for 4 cycles (12 weeks)
Other Names:
600 mg/m2, day 1 for 4 cycles (12 weeks)
Other Names:
1st Biopsy two weeks after Baseline visit.
2nd Biopsy after two weeks of Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Atezolizumab therapy.
3rd Biopsy with tumor size greater 10 mm in diameter.
After completion of 27-28 weeks (Arm B) or 29-30 weeks (Arm A) of neoadjuvant treatment, surgery is planned for all patients.
|
|
Active Comparator: Arm B
12-week therapy with Paclitaxel + Carboplatin + Atezolizumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
This will be followed by Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + Atezolizumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
|
1200 mg Day 1 every 3 weeks for 8 cycles
Other Names:
Dosing according to Area Under the Curve of 2 Intravenous weekly x 12 cycles
Other Names:
Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² IV weekly x 12 cycles
Other Names:
90 mg/m2, day 1 for 4 cycles (12 weeks)
Other Names:
600 mg/m2, day 1 for 4 cycles (12 weeks)
Other Names:
After completion of 27-28 weeks (Arm B) or 29-30 weeks (Arm A) of neoadjuvant treatment, surgery is planned for all patients.
1st Biopsy after two weeks of Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Atezolizumab therapy.
2nd Biopsy with tumor size greater 10mm in diameter.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pathological Complete Response (ypT0/is, ypN0)
Time Frame: after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
Pathological Complete Response defined as no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0).
|
after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Near Pathological Complete Response (Near pCR)
Time Frame: after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
Near pCR defined as residual tumor <5 mm in the breast irrespective of in situ and lymph nodes status
|
after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
|
Number of Adverse Events by Grade
Time Frame: from date of randomization up to 24 months
|
Safety (incidence, relationship, seriousness, and severity of all AEs, SAEs, AESIs coded by medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA), summarized by Preferred Term and System Organ Class and graded according to common terminology criteria of adverse events (CTCAE V5.0)
|
from date of randomization up to 24 months
|
|
Pathological Complete Response (ypT0/is, ypN0) (ER/PR Expression of <1%).
Time Frame: after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B
|
Pathological complete response defined as no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0) in patients with an ER/PR expression of <1% and an ER/PR expression of 1% to 10%.
|
after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B
|
|
Pathological Complete Response (ypT0/is, ypN0) (ER/PR Between 1 and 10 %).
Time Frame: after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B
|
Pathological complete response defined as no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0) in patients with an ER/PR expression of <1% and an ER/PR expression of 1% to 10%.
|
after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B
|
|
Pathological Complete Response (ypT0, ypN0)
Time Frame: after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
Pathological complete response defined as no tumor cells (invasive and no non-invasive) in the breast but also in the lymph nodes (ypN0, ypT0).
|
after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
|
Pathological Complete Response (no Invasive Tumor)
Time Frame: after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
Pathological Complete Response defined as no invasive tumor in the breast, irrespective of lymph node status
|
after 29-30 weeks in Arm A and after 27-28 weeks in Arm B.
|
|
Decrease of Ki-67 Expression by ≥ 30% Compared to Baseline as Continuous Predictor After 14 (Arm A)/28 Days (armB) (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Decrease of Ki-67 expression versus baseline after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment as continuous predictor. General comment to analysis of secondary biomarker endpoints: biomarker endpoints are analysed as secondary efficacy endpoints. Biomarker endpoints are measured by core biopsy at a central pathology laboratory at two different timepoints. For arm A visit 1 (A1 in tables) corresponds to day 14 in the trial and denotes the measurement after the Atezolizumab monotherapy window. Arm A visit 3 (A3 in tables) corresponds to day 28 and denotes a measurement taken again after two weeks of combined immuno- and chemotherapy. In arm B, only visit 2 (day 14; B2 in tables) is measured after the initial two weeks of combined immuno- and chemotherapy. |
after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Decrease of Ki-67 Expression After 28 Days (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment for Arm A and Arm B.
Time Frame: after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Decrease of Ki-67 expression versus baseline by 30% or more after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment.
See general comments to biomarker endpoints above.
Decrease of Ki-67 defined as ≥ 30% compared to baseline.
|
after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Stromal Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) ≥ 60% After 14 (Arm A)/28 Days (ArmB)
Time Frame: after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
TILs after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment as continuous predictor.
See general comments to biomarker endpoints above.
|
after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) ≥ 60% After 28 Days
Time Frame: after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
TILs ≥ 60% after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment. Stromal Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) ≥ 60%. See general comments to biomarker endpoints above. |
after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Complete Cell Cycle Arrest (CCCA) After 14 (Arm A)/28 Days (armB) (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Complete Cell Cycle Arrest (CCCA): Ki-67 expression ≤ 2.7% after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment. See general comments to biomarker endpoints above. |
after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Complete Cell Cycle Arrest (CCCA) After 28 Days (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
CCCA: Ki-67 expression ≤ 2.7%. Complete Cell Cycle Arrest (CCCA) defined as : Ki-67 ≤ 2.7%. See general comments to biomarker endpoints above. |
after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Low Cellularity (< 500 Tumor Cells) After 14 (Arm A)/28 Days (Arm B) (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Low cellularity: < 500 tumor cells after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment.
See general comments to biomarker endpoints above.
|
after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Low Cellularity (< 500 Tumor Cells) After 28 Days (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Low cellularity: < 500 tumor cells after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment.
See general comments to biomarker endpoints above.
|
after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Combined Early Response After 14 (Arm A)/28 (Arm B) Days (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Combined early response defined by
|
after 14/28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Combined Early Response After 28 Days (+/- 2 Days) of Treatment
Time Frame: after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
Combined early response defined by
|
after 28 days (+/- 2 days) of treatment
|
|
Disease Free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: from randomization up to 24 months until date of occurrence of no disease to the first occurrence of disease recurrence or death from any cause
|
Disease free survival (DFS) defined as time from the first date of no disease [i.e.
date of surgery] to the first occurrence of disease recurrence or death from any cause.
|
from randomization up to 24 months until date of occurrence of no disease to the first occurrence of disease recurrence or death from any cause
|
|
Overall Survival (OS).
Time Frame: from randomization up to 24 months until date of death from any cause.
|
Overall survival (OS) defined as length of time from randomization to death from any cause.
Given that novel post-neoadjuvant treatment options (on and off-trial) have emerged such as Pembrolizumab, the post-neoadjuvant treatment in the follow-up phase of this study would have been most certainly highly heterogeneous.
Thus, completion of follow-up to 3 years was no longer justified.
Therefore, follow-up was limited to 2 years and only clinically significant survival signals were observed.
|
from randomization up to 24 months until date of death from any cause.
|
|
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Time Frame: from randomization up to 24 months until date of death from any cause, failure to achieve remission after induction therapy, relapse in any site, or second malignancy
|
Event free survival (EFS) defined as length of time after randomization till death from any cause, failure to achieve remission after induction therapy, relapse in any site, or second malignancy
|
from randomization up to 24 months until date of death from any cause, failure to achieve remission after induction therapy, relapse in any site, or second malignancy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Iris Reiser, Dr., Palleos Healthcare GmbH
- Principal Investigator: Hans-Christian Kolberg, Prof. Dr., Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH; Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe; 46236 Bottrop
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):252-64. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239.
- Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098.
- Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1721-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22618.
- Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):56-61. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8172.
- Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 1;13(15 Pt 1):4429-34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045.
- Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, Symmans WF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy B, Green M, Cristofanilli M, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1275-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4147. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
- Thompson RH, Dong H, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Kwon ED. PD-1 is expressed by tumor-infiltrating immune cells and is associated with poor outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 15;13(6):1757-61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2599.
- Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, Singh B, Cirrincione CT, Tolaney SM, Kuzma CS, Pluard TJ, Somlo G, Port ER, Golshan M, Bellon JR, Collyar D, Hahn OM, Carey LA, Hudis CA, Winer EP. Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):13-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0572. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
- Alme AK, Karir BS, Faltas BM, Drake CG. Blocking immune checkpoints in prostate, kidney, and urothelial cancer: An overview. Urol Oncol. 2016 Apr;34(4):171-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
- Crittenden M, Kohrt H, Levy R, Jones J, Camphausen K, Dicker A, Demaria S, Formenti S. Current clinical trials testing combinations of immunotherapy and radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jan;25(1):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.07.003.
- Deyarmin B, Kane JL, Valente AL, van Laar R, Gallagher C, Shriver CD, Ellsworth RE. Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;20(1):87-93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2588-8. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
- Ditsch N, Untch M, Thill M, Muller V, Janni W, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Diel I, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kuhn T, Kummel S, Loibl S, Luftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mobus V, Muller-Schimpfle M, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schutz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Wenz F, Witzel I, Wockel A. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2019. Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Aug;14(4):224-245. doi: 10.1159/000501000. Epub 2019 Aug 6. No abstract available.
- Dixon JM, Cameron DA, Arthur LM, Axelrod DM, Renshaw L, Thomas JS, Turnbull A, Young O, Loman CA, Jakubowski D, Baehner FL, Singh B. Accurate Estrogen Receptor Quantification in Patients with Negative and Low-Positive Estrogen-Receptor-Expressing Breast Tumors: Sub-Analyses of Data from Two Clinical Studies. Adv Ther. 2019 Apr;36(4):828-841. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0896-0. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
- Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Griffith C, Boeddinghaus I, Salter J, Detre S, Hills M, Ashley S, Francis S, Walsh G; IMPACT Trialists. Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 15;11(2 Pt 2):951s-8s.
- Dowsett M, Smith I, Robertson J, Robison L, Pinhel I, Johnson L, Salter J, Dunbier A, Anderson H, Ghazoui Z, Skene T, Evans A, A'Hern R, Iskender A, Wilcox M, Bliss J. Endocrine therapy, new biologicals, and new study designs for presurgical studies in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2011;2011(43):120-3. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgr034.
- Gelman A, Stern HS, Carlin JB, Dunson DB, Vehtari A & Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 2013
- Gianni L, Huang CS, Egle D, Bermejo B, Zamagni C & Thill M (2019, Dezember 12). Combining Atezolizumab with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Pathologic Complete Response Rates for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. SABCS 2019, Marc.
- Gluz O, Liedtke C, Gottschalk N, Pusztai L, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Triple-negative breast cancer--current status and future directions. Ann Oncol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1913-27. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp492. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
- Gluz O, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Prat A, Christgen M, Gebauer D, Kates R, Pare L, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kuemmel S, Wuerstlein R, Pelz E, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Efficacy of deescalated chemotherapy according to PAM50 subtypes, immune and proliferation genes in triple-negative early breast cancer: Primary translational analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial. Int J Cancer. 2020 Jan 1;146(1):262-271. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32488. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
- Gluz O, Nitz U, Liedtke C, Christgen M, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Bangemann N, Lindner C, Kuemmel S, Clemens M, Potenberg J, Staib P, Kohls A, von Schumann R, Kates R, Kates R, Schumacher J, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Comparison of Neoadjuvant Nab-Paclitaxel+Carboplatin vs Nab-Paclitaxel+Gemcitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Randomized WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial Results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jun 1;110(6):628-637. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx258.
- Houssami N, Macaskill P, von Minckwitz G, Marinovich ML, Mamounas E. Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec;48(18):3342-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
- Ibrahim JG, Chen MH & Sinha, D. (2014). Bayesian Survival Analysis. In N. Balakrishnan, T. Colton, B. Everitt, W. Piegorsch, F. Ruggeri, & J. L. Teugels (Hrsg.), Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (S. stat06003). John Wiley & Sons
- Iwamoto T, Booser D, Valero V, Murray JL, Koenig K, Esteva FJ, Ueno NT, Zhang J, Shi W, Qi Y, Matsuoka J, Yang EJ, Hortobagyi GN, Hatzis C, Symmans WF, Pusztai L. Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1% to 10% ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 1;30(7):729-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2574. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
- Keup C, Storbeck M, Hauch S, Hahn P, Sprenger-Haussels M, Tewes M, Mach P, Hoffmann O, Kimmig R, Kasimir-Bauer S. Cell-Free DNA Variant Sequencing Using CTC-Depleted Blood for Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Testing in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Feb 18;11(2):238. doi: 10.3390/cancers11020238.
- Klein JP & Moeschberger ML (2010). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data (2. ed., corr. 3. print). Springer.
- Lee HJ, Lee JJ, Song IH, Park IA, Kang J, Yu JH, Ahn JH, Gong G. Prognostic and predictive value of NanoString-based immune-related gene signatures in a neoadjuvant setting of triple-negative breast cancer: relationship to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(3):619-27. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3438-8. Epub 2015 May 26.
- Kolberg-Liedtke C, Feuerhake F, Garke M, Christgen M, Kates R, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kuemmel S, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Nitz U, Kreipe H, Gluz O, Harbeck N. Impact of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative early breast cancer in the WSG-ADAPT TN trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 2;24(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01552-w.
- Llombart-Cussac A, Cortes J, Pare L, Galvan P, Bermejo B, Martinez N, Vidal M, Pernas S, Lopez R, Munoz M, Nuciforo P, Morales S, Oliveira M, de la Pena L, Pelaez A, Prat A. HER2-enriched subtype as a predictor of pathological complete response following trastuzumab and lapatinib without chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (PAMELA): an open-label, single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):545-554. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30021-9. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
- Loi S, Schmid P, Aktan G, Karantza V & Salgado R (2019). 4O Relationship between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and response to pembrolizumab (pembro)+ chemotherapy (CT) as neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 trial. Annals of Oncology
- Loibl S, Werutsky G, Nekljudova V, Seiler S, Blohmer JU, Denkert C, Hanusch C, Huober JB, Jackisch C, Kummel S, Schneeweiss A, Untch M, Rhiem K, Fasching PA, Von Minckwitz G & Furlanetto J (2017). Impact in delay of start of chemotherapy and surgery on pCR and survival in breast cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from six prospectively randomized neoadjuvant trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Marra A, Viale G, Curigliano G. Recent advances in triple negative breast cancer: the immunotherapy era. BMC Med. 2019 May 9;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1326-5.
- Matsushita M, Kawaguchi M. Immunomodulatory Effects of Drugs for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy. J Oncol. 2018 Oct 25;2018:8653489. doi: 10.1155/2018/8653489. eCollection 2018.
- Foulds GA, Vadakekolathu J, Abdel-Fatah TMA, Nagarajan D, Reeder S, Johnson C, Hood S, Moseley PM, Chan SYT, Pockley AG, Rutella S, McArdle SEB. Immune-Phenotyping and Transcriptomic Profiling of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From Patients With Breast Cancer: Identification of a 3 Gene Signature Which Predicts Relapse of Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 11;9:2028. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02028. eCollection 2018.
- Nuciforo P, Pascual T, Cortes J, Llombart-Cussac A, Fasani R, Pare L, Oliveira M, Galvan P, Martinez N, Bermejo B, Vidal M, Pernas S, Lopez R, Munoz M, Garau I, Manso L, Alarcon J, Martinez E, Rodrik-Outmezguine V, Brase JC, Villagrasa P, Prat A, Holgado E. A predictive model of pathologic response based on tumor cellularity and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CelTIL) in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with chemo-free dual HER2 blockade. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):170-177. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx647.
- Park MM, Ebel JJ, Zhao W, Zynger DL. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment. Breast J. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):37-45. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12223. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
- Raghav KP, Hernandez-Aya LF, Lei X, Chavez-Macgregor M, Meric-Bernstam F, Buchholz TA, Sahin A, Do KA, Hortobagyi GN, Gonzalez-Angulo AM. Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers. Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1498-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26431. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
- Raja R, Kuziora M, Brohawn PZ, Higgs BW, Gupta A, Dennis PA, Ranade K. Early Reduction in ctDNA Predicts Survival in Patients with Lung and Bladder Cancer Treated with Durvalumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 15;24(24):6212-6222. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0386. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
- Royston P & Sauerbrei W (2008). Multivariable Model-Building. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Saliou A, Bidard FC, Lantz O, Stern MH, Vincent-Salomon A, Proudhon C, Pierga JY. Circulating tumor DNA for triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis and treatment decisions. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(1):39-50. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2016.1121100. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
- Sanford RA, Song J, Gutierrez-Barrera AM, Profato J, Woodson A, Litton JK, Bedrosian I, Albarracin CT, Valero V, Arun B. High incidence of germline BRCA mutation in patients with ER low-positive/PR low-positive/HER-2 neu negative tumors. Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3422-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29572. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
- Schmid P, Cortés J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur HL, Kuemmel S, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park YH & Hui R (2019). KEYNOTE-522: Phase III study of pembrolizumab (pembro)+ chemotherapy (chemo) vs placebo (pbo)+ chemo as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by pembro vs pbo as adjuvant treatment for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Annals of Oncology
- Schmid P. ESMO 2018 presidential symposium-IMpassion130: atezolizumab+nab-paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2018 Oct 20;3(6):e000453. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000453. eCollection 2018. No abstract available.
- Slovin SF, Higano CS, Hamid O, Tejwani S, Harzstark A, Alumkal JJ, Scher HI, Chin K, Gagnier P, McHenry MB, Beer TM. Ipilimumab alone or in combination with radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from an open-label, multicenter phase I/II study. Ann Oncol. 2013 Jul;24(7):1813-1821. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt107. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
- Sokolenko AP, Imyanitov EN. Molecular Tests for the Choice of Cancer Therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(32):4794-4806. doi: 10.2174/1381612823666170719110125.
- Tan W, Yang M, Yang H, Zhou F, Shen W. Predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer: tumor-, blood-, and imaging-related biomarkers. Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Oct 9;10:4333-4347. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S174435. eCollection 2018.
- Tibshirani R (1996). Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)
- Yang B, Chou J, Tao Y, Wu D, Wu X, Li X, Li Y, Chu Y, Tang F, Shi Y, Ma L, Zhou T, Kaufmann W, Carey LA, Wu J, Hu Z. An assessment of prognostic immunity markers in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018 Oct 29;4:35. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0088-0. eCollection 2018.
- Yi M, Huo L, Koenig KB, Mittendorf EA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Bedrosian I, Buzdar AU, Symmans WF, Crow JR, Bender M, Shah RR, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK. Which threshold for ER positivity? a retrospective study based on 9639 patients. Ann Oncol. 2014 May;25(5):1004-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu053. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
- Untch M, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Conrad B, Aktas B, Denkert C, Eidtmann H, Wiebringhaus H, Kummel S, Hilfrich J, Warm M, Paepke S, Just M, Hanusch C, Hackmann J, Blohmer JU, Clemens M, Darb-Esfahani S, Schmitt WD, Dan Costa S, Gerber B, Engels K, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, von Minckwitz G; German Breast Group (GBG); Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie-Breast (AGO-B) Investigators. Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):345-356. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00542-2. Epub 2016 Feb 8. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):e270. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30217-0.
- Loibl S, Untch M, Burchardi N, Huober J, Sinn BV, Blohmer JU, Grischke EM, Furlanetto J, Tesch H, Hanusch C, Engels K, Rezai M, Jackisch C, Schmitt WD, von Minckwitz G, Thomalla J, Kummel S, Rautenberg B, Fasching PA, Weber K, Rhiem K, Denkert C, Schneeweiss A. A randomised phase II study investigating durvalumab in addition to an anthracycline taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: clinical results and biomarker analysis of GeparNuevo study. Ann Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;30(8):1279-1288. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz158.
- Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Bonnefoi H, Cameron D, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Swain SM, Prowell T, Loibl S, Wickerham DL, Bogaerts J, Baselga J, Perou C, Blumenthal G, Blohmer J, Mamounas EP, Bergh J, Semiglazov V, Justice R, Eidtmann H, Paik S, Piccart M, Sridhara R, Fasching PA, Slaets L, Tang S, Gerber B, Geyer CE Jr, Pazdur R, Ditsch N, Rastogi P, Eiermann W, von Minckwitz G. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Skin Diseases
- Breast Diseases
- Breast Neoplasms
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
- Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
- Proteins
- Organic Chemicals
- Therapeutics
- Drug Administration Routes
- Drug Therapy
- Hydrocarbons
- Cycloparaffins
- Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic
- Hydrocarbons, Cyclic
- Terpenes
- Carbohydrates
- Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
- Hydrocarbons, Aromatic
- Polycyclic Compounds
- Glycosides
- Coordination Complexes
- Taxoids
- Cyclodecanes
- Diterpenes
- Phosphoramide Mustards
- Nitrogen Mustard Compounds
- Mustard Compounds
- Hydrocarbons, Halogenated
- Phosphoramides
- Organophosphorus Compounds
- Anthracyclines
- Naphthacenes
- Aminoglycosides
- Daunorubicin
- Albumins
- Doxorubicin
- Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel
- Cyclophosphamide
- Carboplatin
- Paclitaxel
- Epirubicin
- Injections
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- atezolizumab
Other Study ID Numbers
- Phaon1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Triple-negative Breast Cancer
-
G1 Therapeutics, Inc.TerminatedBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | Triple-Negative Breast NeoplasmsUnited States, Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Belgium, North Macedonia, Slovakia
-
Peregrine PharmaceuticalsWithdrawnBreast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms | Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | Triple-Negative Breast Neoplasm | ER-Negative PR-Negative HER2-Negative Breast Neoplasms | ER-Negative PR-Negative HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
-
Swiss Cancer InstituteRecruitingTriple-negative Breast Cancer | TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast CancerSwitzerland
-
Telomir Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Not yet recruitingTriple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) | Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
-
Rima PatelRecruitingTNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | Locally Advanced Triple Negative Breast CancerUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH); MedImmune...TerminatedTriple Negative Breast Cancer | Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms | TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | Triple-negative Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
AkesoActive, not recruitingMetastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer | Locally Advanced Triple-negative Breast CancerChina
-
Mabwell (Shanghai) Bioscience Co., Ltd.RecruitingTriple-Negative Breast CancerChina
-
Fudan UniversityRecruitingTriple-negative Breast CancerChina
-
UNICANCERGustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris; SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group and other collaboratorsRecruitingTriple-negative Breast CancerFrance, Spain
Clinical Trials on Atezolizumab 840 MG in 14 ML Injection
-
Affimed GmbHTerminatedAdvanced Solid TumorUnited States, Korea, Republic of, Spain, Poland, United Kingdom
-
EirGenix, Inc.Sacura GmbHCompleted
-
Fundacion Espanola para la Curacion de la Leucemia...Pfizer; Roche Farma, S.ATerminatedChronic Phase-Chronic Myeloid LeukemiaSpain
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterWithdrawnProstate CancerUnited States
-
Gruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca ClinicaRecruitingMesotheliomas PleuralItaly
-
Adlai Nortye Biopharma Co., Ltd.CompletedLocally Advanced Solid TumorUnited States
-
Taipei Medical UniversityCompleted
-
The Stone Research Foundation for Sports Medicine...Enrolling by invitationTrauma | Surgery | Complication of Surgical Procedure | Muscle Atrophy | Knee Injuries and DisordersUnited States
-
Turgut Ardika PTY LTDRecruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalSMG-SNU Boramae Medical CenterCompleted