Study to Assess AFM24 in Combination With Atezolizumab in Selected Advanced/Metastatic EGFR-expressing Cancers

August 15, 2025 updated by: Affimed GmbH

A Phase 1/2a Open Label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AFM24 in Combination With Atezolizumab in Patients With Selected Advanced/Metastatic EGFR-expressing Cancers

AFM24-102 is a Phase 1/2a open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, dose escalation, and expansion study evaluating AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab in patients with selected EGRF-expressing advanced solid malignancies whose disease has progressed after treatment with previous anticancer therapies.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

There will be 2 parts in this study: a dose escalation phase (phase 1) and an expansion phase (phase 2a). Patients will qualify to receive the investigational drugs (AFM24 + atezolizumab) in the dose escalation phase or the expansion phase only if they are deemed eligible following the safety lead-in phase. Seven days before the planned first combination treatment, patients will receive a single dose of AFM24 and will be observed for any adverse events for 1 week.

The aim of the dose escalation phase is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab.

The dose escalation phase will be followed by the expansion phase once the MTD/RP2D of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab has been determined. The expansion phase of the study is intended to collect preliminary evidence of efficacy and to further confirm the safety of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab.

The tumor types planned to be studied in the AFM24/atezolizumab combination study will be:

  • Non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR-WT), with disease progression after chemotherapy and PD1/PD-L1 targeted therapy
  • Gastric/GEJ cancer if intolerant to or with disease progression after standard platinum-based chemotherapy
  • Pancreatic/hepatocellular/biliary tract cancer with disease progression after standard of care (SOC) therapy or if there is no appropriate SOC available for their condition
  • Advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring a targetable EGFR kinase domain mutation with disease progression on or after received ≥1 prior lines of treatment for advanced disease, including a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) for EGFR mutations

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 93
        • The Catholic University Of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital
      • Lublin, Poland, 20-954
        • Independent Public Teaching Hospital #4 in Lublin, Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy
      • Otwock, Poland, 05-400
        • European Health Center Otwock Fryderyk Chopin Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology
      • Poznań, Poland, 60-693
        • MED-Polonia, Sp. z o.o. (LLC)
      • Słupsk, Poland, 76-200
        • Janusz Korczak Provincial Specialist Hospital in Slupsk Limited Liability Company
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-781
        • Maria Sklodowska-Curie - National Research Institute of Oncology, Early Phase Research Department
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)
      • Madrid, Spain, 28223
        • University Hospital Quiron Madrid
      • Pamplona, Spain, 31008
        • University Clinic of Navarra - Pamplona
      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Hospital Clinic Universitario Biomedical Research institute INCLIVA
      • Sutton, United Kingdom, SM2 5PT
        • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust - ICR
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic EGFR-positive selected cancer types (except for NSCLC)
  • Advanced or metastatic NSCLC, EGFR WT: disease has progressed after ≥ 1 prior lines of therapy which must have included a platinum-based doublet in combination with PD1/PD-L1 antibody or must have received an anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibody prior to or after a platinum-based doublet
  • Advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastric/GEJ adenocarinoma: after ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen including a platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet
  • Advanced or metastatic HCC (BCLC C or B not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy), hepatobiliary-, or pancreatic adenocarcinoma: after ≥1 prior line of an approved SOC therapy for the respective disease type or to whom the available SOC is not appropriate in the opinion of the investigator
  • Advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring a targetable EGFR kinase domain mutation and whose disease has progressed on or after having received ≥ prior TKI approved for EGFR mutated NSCLC. Subjects treated with a 1st or 2nd generation TKI in 1st line who developed a documented T790M mutation must have received a TKI targeting this mutation such as Osimertinib or Lazertinib to be eligible. Subjects must have documentation of EGFR mutated NSCLC as assessed by an approved test using genomic sequencing of tumor or circulation free tumor DNA. The patients should have received a 2nd line of treatment if approved and available or may be enrolled in the study if in the opinion of the investigator it is in the patient's best interest,or the SOC is not appropriate.
  • Adequate organ function
  • Phase 1: Evaluable or measurable disease per RECIST v1.1
  • Phase 2a: Measurable disease per RECIST v1.1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with systemic anticancer therapy including investigational agent within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug, 6 weeks for mitomycin C or nitrosoureas, 2 weeks (or 5 half-lives whichever is longer) for using fluorouracil or small molecule targeted drugs, 2 weeks for using traditional Chinese medicine with anti-tumor indication.
  • Radiation therapy within 2 weeks before 1st dose of study drug or unresolved toxicity from previous radiotherapy
  • History of any other malignancy known to be active, with the exception of completely removed in situ cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia, non-melanoma skin cancer, DCIS, early stage prostate cancer that has been adequately treated, and other cancers from which the patient has been disease free for 3 years or longer
  • Currently active in any other clinical study, or administration of other investigational agent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Escalation Phase
The Escalation phase will determine the MTD/RP2D of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab. A traditional 3+3 design will be used to determine the RP2D.
intravenous infusion
intravenous infusion
Experimental: Expansion Phase
The expansion phase will collect preliminary evidence of efficacy and further confirm the safety of AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab.
intravenous infusion
intravenous infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1: Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During Cycle 1
Time Frame: During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
The number of patients with dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle, as assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Technology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0
During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Phase 2a: Overall Response Rate (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR])
Time Frame: Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 97 weeks.
Tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Best overall response was used to define the Overall Response Rate (CR or PR). Best overall response is CR or PR if a CR or PR assessed at least 42 days after Cycle 1 Day 1 was confirmed by subsequent tumor assessment at least 4 weeks later.
Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 97 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Patients With TEAEs
Time Frame: From first drug administration up to 30 (non-serious TEAEs) or 56 (serious TEAEs) days after last dose AFM24, until start of a subsequent anticancer treatment, or data cut-off date, whichever is sooner. Up to approx. 35 (phase 1) and 105 weeks (phase 2a).
Number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) non-serious or serious
From first drug administration up to 30 (non-serious TEAEs) or 56 (serious TEAEs) days after last dose AFM24, until start of a subsequent anticancer treatment, or data cut-off date, whichever is sooner. Up to approx. 35 (phase 1) and 105 weeks (phase 2a).
Incidence of Patients With SAEs
Time Frame: From first drug administration up to 56 days after the last dose of AFM24, until the start of a subsequent anticancer treatment, or data cut-off date, whichever is sooner. Up to approximately 35 (phase 1) and 105 weeks (phase 2a).
Number of patients with treatment-emergent serious adverse events (serious TEAEs)
From first drug administration up to 56 days after the last dose of AFM24, until the start of a subsequent anticancer treatment, or data cut-off date, whichever is sooner. Up to approximately 35 (phase 1) and 105 weeks (phase 2a).
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AFM24
Time Frame: During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) on Cycle 1 Day 22
During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AFM24
Time Frame: During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) Corresponding to Ctrough levels at the end of the dosing interval at Cycle 1 Day 22
During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AFM24
Time Frame: During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Area under the concentration-time curve over the dose interval (AUCtau) on Cycle 1 Day 22
During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AFM24
Time Frame: During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Time to Cmax (Tmax) on Cycle 1 Day 22
During cycle 1 (each cycle has 28 days)
Frequency of Patients Developing Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) Against AFM24
Time Frame: Ph 1 within 2h prior to: each drug intake (Cycle 1), 1st + 3rd drug intake (Cycle 2 onwards) and at EOT, up to 27 weeks. Ph 2a within 2h prior to: 1st drug intake (Cycle 1 and Cycle 3 onwards), 1st + 3rd drug intake (Cycle 2) and at EOT, up to 97 weeks.
Measurement of ADAs before and during treatment with AFM24 in combination with atezolizumab Patients with at least one ADA-positive result at baseline or post-baseline counted as developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against AFM24
Ph 1 within 2h prior to: each drug intake (Cycle 1), 1st + 3rd drug intake (Cycle 2 onwards) and at EOT, up to 27 weeks. Ph 2a within 2h prior to: 1st drug intake (Cycle 1 and Cycle 3 onwards), 1st + 3rd drug intake (Cycle 2) and at EOT, up to 97 weeks.
Phase 1: Overall Response Rate (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR])
Time Frame: Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 27 weeks.
Tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Best overall response was used to define the Overall Response Rate (CR or PR). Best overall response is CR or PR if a CR or PR assessed at least 42 days after Cycle 1 Day 1 was confirmed by subsequent tumor assessment at least 4 weeks later.
Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 27 weeks.
Phase 2a: Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: From the first treatment received until the first progression disease assessed by investigator or death.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was defined as (date of first progression - date of first study drug injection)/30.4375. Patients without progression or death were censored. Tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1 by investigator.
From the first treatment received until the first progression disease assessed by investigator or death.
Phase 2a: Duration of Response
Time Frame: From the date of first response (unconfirmed) until progression disease assessed by investigator or death.
Duration of Response (DOR) was defined as (date of first progression or death - date of first response (unconfirmed))/30.4375. Patients without response were excluded from the analysis. Patients without progression or death were censored. Tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1 by investigator.
From the date of first response (unconfirmed) until progression disease assessed by investigator or death.
Phase 2a: Clinical Benefit Rate (CR or PR [Any Duration] or Stable Disease Equal or > 24 Weeks)
Time Frame: Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 97 weeks.
Tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Best overall response was used to define the Clinical benefit rate (CR or PR or SD ≥24 weeks). Best overall response is CR or PR if a CR or PR assessed at least 42 days after Cycle 1 Day 1 was confirmed by subsequent tumor assessment at least 4 weeks later. Best overall response is SD if SD or unconfirmed CR or unconfirmed PR at least 42 days after C1D1. Best overall response SD counts for Clinical benefit rate if SD ongoing for at least 24 weeks.
Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 97 weeks.
Phase 2a: Disease Control Rate (DCR) (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD])
Time Frame: Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 97 weeks.
Tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Best overall response was used to define the Disease Control Rate (CR or PR or SD). Best overall response is CR or PR if a CR or PR assessed at least 42 days after Cycle 1 Day 1 was confirmed by subsequent tumor assessment at least 4 weeks later. Best overall response is SD if SD or unconfirmed CR or unconfirmed PR at least 42 days after C1D1.
Tumor assessments were conducted during last week of cycle 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and every 3 cycles thereafter (each cycle has 28 days), up to approximately 97 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Daniela Morales-Espinosa, MD, Affimed GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Solid Tumor

Clinical Trials on AFM24

Subscribe