Balance, Activity and Quality of Life (BAL)

Feasibility Study Exploring a Resource-orientered, Coordinated Rehabilitation and Palliative Care Intervention Among People With Advanced Cancer.

Background: Advanced cancer may cause functional limitations, subsequently leading to decreased ability to perform and engage in everyday activities, such as self-care, household, leisure and civic life. In addition, people with advanced cancer need alleviation from the pain and sorrow following limited life expectancy wherefore they prefer to focus on everyday life function and activities, lightness and enjoyment. The overall aim of the Balance, Activity and quality of Life (BAL) project is to develop, test and evaluate effectiveness and process of a resource-oriented intervention which coordinates rehabilitation and palliative care to enhance quality of life (QoL), balance and enjoyment in everyday activities and functioning. The development of the intervention is guided by the British Medical Research Council's guidance (MRC).

The present study consists of a resource-oriented intervention, which will be feasibility tested in the research clinic of REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care. The study will inform the development of a resource-oriented program for people with advanced cancer.

Material and Methods: A feasibility study designed as a one-armed, pre-post study with follow-up after five days and again after 6 and 12 weeks. The study will recruit 20-25 home-living adults (⩾18 years) with chronic or advanced cancer reporting needs in everyday life.

Outcomes are quality of life, physical function and fatigue assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30). Furthermore, balance in everyday activities will be assessed using the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11 (OBQ-11).

Besides outcomes, process data will also be collected regarding: 1) fidelity, 2) adherence, 3) dose and 4) reach and mechanisms of impact with attention to participant's experiences of and interactions with the intervention. These data will be collected using registration forms, questionnaires, participant-observations and focus-group interviews.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nyborg, Denmark, 5800
        • REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Home-living adults
  • Diagnosed with chronic or advanced cancer
  • Report a need of support in everyday life and to better balance everyday life with necessary and meaningful activities
  • Motivated and able to participate in the intervention
  • Know sufficient Danish to complete questionnaires and participate in interviews

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dependent in basic activities of daily living (personal care, dressing and eating)
  • Not able to complete questionnaires and participate in interviews
  • Severe cognitive deficits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BAL
A resource-orientered, individual and group-based intervention addressing balance in everyday life, activities and QoL among people with chronic or advanced cancer.
The intervention is delivered by an interdisciplinary team of occupational therapist, physiotherapist, nurse, psychologist, physician and social worker. It consists of a five-day residential stay at REHPA and a two-day follow-up stay after seven weeks at home. The residential stays include both workshops and engagement in physical and creative activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in global health status/ quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 6 week
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome
6 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in global health status/ quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 5 day
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome
5 day
Change in balance in everyday life using the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11
Time Frame: 5 day
Scores between 11-44, with higher scores indicating better outcome
5 day
Change in physical function using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 5 day
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome
5 day
Change in fatigue using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 5 day
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating worse outcome
5 day
Change in balance in everyday life using the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11
Time Frame: 6 week
Scores between 11-44, with higher scores indicating better outcome
6 week
Change in physical function using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 6 week
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome
6 week
Change in fatigue using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 6 week
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating worse outcome
6 week
Change in global health status/ quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 12 week
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome
12 week
Change in balance in everyday life using the Occupational Balance Questionnaire 11
Time Frame: 12 week
Scores between 11-44, with higher scores indicating better outcome
12 week
Change in physical function using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 12 week
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome
12 week
Change in fatigue using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30
Time Frame: 12 week
Scores between 0-100, with higher scores indicating worse outcome
12 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen la Cour, PhD, University of Southern Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Sampedro Pilegaard, PhD, REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REHPA

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Advanced Cancer

Clinical Trials on A resource-oriented intervention

Subscribe