Prior CABG Patients Evaluated for Saphenous VeIn grAft DysfUnction and Progression of Coronary arTery Disease (VIADUCT)

May 30, 2023 updated by: Paul Knaapen, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Evaluated for Saphenous VeIn grAft DysfUnction and Progression of Coronary arTery Disease

This is a multi-center, observational cohort study including patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and ≥1 saphenous vein grafts (SVG) presenting with recurrent ischemic symptoms. Objective: to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with prior CABG evaluated for bypass graft failure and progression of native coronary artery disease (CAD). Follow-up will be collected through national registry databases, electronic medical patient records and standardized telephonic assessment at 3 and 5 years follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite advances in secondary prevention, a wide variety of vascular grafts available, and evolving surgical techniques, long-term efficacy of CABG is hampered by bypass graft failure and native CAD progression. Therefore, patients with prior CABG often present with recurrent ischemic symptoms. Indeed, many prior CABG patients undergo repeat cardiac catheterization and require subsequent revascularization therapy. The clinical evaluation and diagnostic work-up of patients with recurrent angina after CABG is challenging. Patients with previous CABG are generally older, have a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors and comorbidities, more extensive CAD, and complex atherosclerotic lesion morphology. Furthermore, current guideline recommendations on patient management are limited since post-CABG patients have often been underrepresented or excluded in large diagnostic and revascularization trials. This registry will include patients presenting with recurrent ischemic symptoms with a history of CABG and ≥1 SVGs that are referred to the Amsterdam University Medical Centers. Patients will be eligible for inclusion in the VIADUCT registry after consideration of in- and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, patients will be approached for study participation. Patients are free to refuse or to withdraw from participation in the registry at any moment. The primary objective is to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent symptoms who are evaluated for bypass graft failure and native CAD progression. In addition, results from non-invasive and invasive diagnostic tools that are used during clinical work-up to assess graft patency, the hemodynamic significance of native CAD progression, left ventricular function, and myocardial viability will be collected. We aim to evaluate the value of such tools to guide optimal repeat revascularization strategy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Cardiology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with recurrent angina symptoms and a cardiac history of CABG with one or more saphenous vein grafts evaluated for saphenous vein graft dysfunction and progression of coronary artery disease in the Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Cardiology

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prior coronary artery bypass grafting
  • One or more saphenous vein grafts
  • Recurrent angina symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years of age
  • ≥ 90 years of age
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Pregnancy
  • Failure to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Time Frame: 3 year follow-up
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven repeat revascularization)
3 year follow-up
Saphenous vein graft failure
Time Frame: At the time of referral and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Failure rate and duration of graft patency following prior CABG procedure
At the time of referral and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Time Frame: 3 and 5 years follow-up
Components of MACE (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven repeat revascularization)
3 and 5 years follow-up
Procedural success and mortality in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of a saphenous vein graft
Time Frame: In hospital and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Procedural success defined by technical success and no major in-hospital complications (mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, tamponade requiring centesis, emergency CABG/PCI, acute kidney failure requiring dialysis, vascular access site complication or major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery)
In hospital and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Procedural success and mortality in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of a (bypassed) native coronary artery
Time Frame: In hospital and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Procedural success defined by technical success and no major in-hospital complications (mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, tamponade requiring centesis, emergency CABG/PCI, acute kidney failure requiring dialysis, vascular access site complication or major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery)
In hospital and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Quality of life assessed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Grading Scale
Time Frame: At baseline and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Grading Scale measures whether patient have angina pectoris complaints, and to what extent patients experienced this. It uses a scale of 1-4 where 1 means angina pectoris (chest pain) only occurs with strenuous, rapid or prolonged exertion, and 4 means angina is present during little physical effort or even during rest.
At baseline and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Quality of life assessed by Rose dyspnea scale questionnaire (RDS)
Time Frame: At baseline and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Rose dyspnea scale questionnaire (RDS) measures dyspnea complaints, or shortness of breath. It consists of 4 questions about dyspnea complaints in the everyday life of patients. For every patient, a score is compiled of the highest limitation in daily life, resulting in a score of 0-4, where 0 means no dyspnea complaints and 4 means the patient has complaints during no or minimal physical effort.
At baseline and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Composite score of quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up
Composite of all quality of life questionnaires, where all outcomes are summed to provide a total score
At baseline and during subsequent 3 and 5 years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Knaapen, Professor, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Cardiology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 23, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 23, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Graft Failure

Subscribe