The Effects of Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Osteoarthritis

January 22, 2022 updated by: Dr. Elif becenen, Turkish League Against Rheumatism

Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasound Guided Genicular Nerve Block Versus Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Goal: Comparison of the effects of genicular nerve block with usg and physical therapy on pain, physical function for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Material and Methods:102 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee with Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) class 2 or 3 were included in the study.Patients were randomized to two groups, first being injected a total of 6 mL of lidocaine plus 40 mg of triamcinolone (TA) at 3 separate target sites: the superior lateral, superior medial, and inferior medial genicular nerves with exercise treatment and second being ten sessions of hotpack as a surface warmer, TENS as a analgezic current, ultrasound therapy as a deep warmer with exercise treatment.For the first group, the ultrasound we used: 12 MHz linear transducer. (Logic E9-GE, USA).The transducer was first placed parallel to the long bone shaft and moved up or down to identify the epicondyle of the long bone. The genicular arteries were identified near the periosteal areas, which are the junctions of the epicondyle and the shafts of the femur and tibia, and confirmed by color Doppler ultrasound.Accordingly, GNB target points should be next to each genicular artery because the superior lateral, superior medial, and inferior medial genicular artery traveled along each genicular nerve. , Visual Analogue Scale for pain(VAS) was primer outcome measurement, Western Ontorio and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and six minute walk tests were seconder outcome measurements of the study applied before, after (two weeks) and 12th weeks of treatment. Primer endpoint of the study is decrease at least 40% in VAS values at 2nd week, second endpoint is the improvement in the womac and 6-minute walk test observed in the 2nd week continues until the 12th week.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06800
        • Ankara City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis according to the 1986 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and were in Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Grade 2-3
  • Being between the ages of 45-65

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe knee trauma history within the six month
  • Previous intraarticular hyaluronic acid or steroid injection
  • Previous use of oral glucosamine
  • Meniscal or connective tissue damage
  • Those receiving physical therapy within the six month for knee pain
  • History of inflamatuary romatologic disease
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Malignancy
  • Psychiatric disease
  • Those with a pacemaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Physical Therapy
Ten sessions of hotpack as a surface warmer, TENS as a analgezic current, ultrasound therapy as a deep warmer and exercise treatment.
Active Comparator: Genicular Nerve Block
This method was used to inject a total of 6 mL of lidocaine plus 40 mg of triamcinolone (TA) at 3 separate target sites: the superior lateral, superior medial, and inferior medial genicular nerves plus exercise treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, Change from Baseline visual analog scale at 12th weeks
A scale for the use of measuring pain. Minimum score of the scale is 0 and maximum is 10. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.
Pre-intervention, Change from Baseline visual analog scale at 12th weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, Change from baseline WOMAC score at 12th weeks
WOMAC is a scale to assess disease-related functional status and disability. It consists of three parts with 24 simple questions in total. Five questions are related to pain (WOMAC-A), two questions to morning stiffness (WOMAC-B), and the remaining 17 questions to physical condition (WOMAC-C). Each question is scored using 4-point Likert scale (0= None, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe, 4= Very severe). Higher scores indicate severe pain, increased stiffness, and functional failure. Minimum score of the scale is 0 and maximum is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.
Pre-intervention, Change from baseline WOMAC score at 12th weeks
Six minute walk test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, Change from baseline six minute walk test at 12th weeks
It is an objective method to evaluate exercise tolerance. It was performed on an unobstructed bare 30 meters (m) floor where every 3 meters were marked. The patients were allowed to complete the test by reducing their walking speed or stopping and getting some rest, if needed. Maximum walking distance (meters) within six min was measured. Higher distance means better outcome.
Pre-intervention, Change from baseline six minute walk test at 12th weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TRASD-TG-GB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided genicular nerve block + exercise treatment

3
Subscribe