- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04784416
Transcranial Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer's Disease (TRAP-AD)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
Orangeburg, New York, United States, 10962
- Nathan Kline Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to give written informed consent and follow study procedures.
- Age > or = 65 years and < or = 85 years.
- Meets the Petersen MCI criteria for Amnestic MCI (single and multiple domain) with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) between 0.5-1.0, and a Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) of 1-4.
- Be willing to identify an informed relative, family member, spouse, or friend for study staff to interview to confirm subject reports as per UDS 3.0 guidelines; however the lack of a study informant is not exclusionary.
- Have at least a high school diploma/12 years of education.
- Participants with current mild MDD may be allowed to participate, given that mild MDD does not affect cognition and does not pose increased risk to the participant, as determined by site PI on a case-by-case basis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwilling/unable to comply with study procedures.
- Other diagnosis of dementia (i.e. not Alzheimer's type), history of brain tumor, MRI evidence of brain damage or brain disease including significant trauma, hydrocephalus, seizures, intellectual disability, or other serious neurological disorder (e.g. Parkinson's disease or other movement disorders).
- History of significant cerebrovascular pathology (e.g., significant stroke). Subjects with a history of cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction) will be allowed to participate at site PI's discretion, on a case-by-case basis, given that the cardiovascular disease is stable and does not reflect the presence of significant cerebrovascular pathology.
- Clinically unstable systemic medical disorders.
- Current DSM-5 diagnosis of alcohol or drug use disorder or other major psychiatric illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar, PTSD, depression). Participants with current mild MDD may be allowed to participate, given that mild MDD does not affect cognition and does not pose increased risk to the participant, as determined by site PI on a case-by-case basis. Participants with current moderate/severe MDD will be excluded.
- Clinical or laboratory evidence of hypothyroidism.
- Clinically significant abnormal findings of laboratory parameters or at physical examination.
- Medications affecting cognition (e.g., narcotic analgesics; chronic use of medications with anticholinergic activity, anti-Parkinsonian medications, antipsychotic meds, etc.). Stable use (i.e., = 6 months) of memantine or acetylcholinesterase inhibitors will be allowed.
- Family history of early onset (<60 y/o) dementia.
- Past intolerance or hypersensitivity to t-PBM.
- Significant skin conditions on the subject's scalp in the area of the procedure sites.
- Any use of light-activated drugs (photodynamic therapy) within 14 days prior to study enrollment.
- Any type of implants in the head, whose functioning might be affected by t-PBM.
- The completion of study imaging procedures is highly encouraged, but not mandatory for participants with extenuating circumstances (e.g., having prosthetic devices or metallic foreign bodies that constitute hazards for MRI, unable to get PET due to previous level of radiation exposure, having claustrophobia, having a large body size and shape).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham
|
PET tracer to be injected prior to PET imaging session, which will occur during baseline assessments
The sham mode (0 mW/cm2) will be used.
The duration or sham "irradiation" will be for ~11 minutes (666 seconds).
|
|
Experimental: Transcranial Photobiomodulation (t-PBM)
|
PET tracer to be injected prior to PET imaging session, which will occur during baseline assessments
The NIR continuous wave (average irradiance = 300 mW/cm2) will be used.
The duration or irradiation will be for ~11 minutes (666 seconds).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS) Total Scale Index Score.
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8
|
RBANS is s a brief, individually administered battery to measure cognitive decline or improvement.
Total Scale Index Score Range = 40-160.
A higher score indicates better performance.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS) Total Scale Index Score.
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
|
RBANS is s a brief, individually administered battery to measure cognitive decline or improvement.
Total Scale Index Score Range = 40-160.
A higher score indicates better performance.
|
Baseline, Month 3
|
|
Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
ACE-III is a screening test that is composed of tests of attention, orientation, memory, language, visual perceptual and visuospatial skills.
The total range of raw score is 0-100.
A higher score indicates more intact cognitive functioning.
|
Baseline
|
|
Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) Score
Time Frame: Week 8
|
ACE-III is a screening test that is composed of tests of attention, orientation, memory, language, visual perceptual and visuospatial skills.
The total range of raw score is 0-100.
A higher score indicates more intact cognitive functioning.
|
Week 8
|
|
Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-III) Score
Time Frame: Month 3
|
ACE-III is a screening test that is composed of tests of attention, orientation, memory, language, visual perceptual and visuospatial skills.
The total range of raw score is 0-100.
A higher score indicates more intact cognitive functioning.
|
Month 3
|
|
Letter Comparison Test Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The total range of score is 0-21.
A higher raw score indicates better performance.
|
Baseline
|
|
Letter Comparison Test Score
Time Frame: Week 8
|
The total range of score is 0-21.
A higher raw score indicates better performance.
|
Week 8
|
|
Letter Comparison Test Score
Time Frame: Month 3
|
The total range of score is 0-21.
A higher raw score indicates better performance.
|
Month 3
|
|
Pattern Comparison Test Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The total range of score is 0-30.
A higher raw score indicates better performance.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pattern Comparison Test Score
Time Frame: Week 8
|
The total range of score is 0-30.
A higher raw score indicates better performance.
|
Week 8
|
|
Pattern Comparison Test Score
Time Frame: Month 3
|
The total range of score is 0-30.
A higher raw score indicates better performance.
|
Month 3
|
|
Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
SCWT is a neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect.
This study will use T-scores, range = 20 - 80.
A higher T-score indicates better performance.
|
Baseline
|
|
Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT)
Time Frame: Week 8
|
SCWT is a neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect.
This study will use T-scores, range = 20 - 80.
A higher T-score indicates better performance.
|
Week 8
|
|
Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT)
Time Frame: Month 3
|
SCWT is a neuropsychological test extensively used to assess the ability to inhibit cognitive interference that occurs when the processing of a specific stimulus feature impedes the simultaneous processing of a second stimulus attribute, well-known as the Stroop Effect.
This study will use T-scores, range = 20 - 80.
A higher T-score indicates better performance.
|
Month 3
|
|
Difference in Score Between Trail Making Test-A (TMT-A) and Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Trails Making Test (Trails) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. Both parts of the Trail Making Test consist of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1-25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern (alternating numbers and letters). The time it takes to connect the "trail" is recorded. Reported as B - A. Range = 0 - 100+ (measured in seconds). A higher B - A score indicates poorer performance. |
Baseline
|
|
Difference in Score Between Trail Making Test-A (TMT-A) and Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B)
Time Frame: Week 8
|
Trails Making Test (Trails) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. Both parts of the Trail Making Test consist of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1-25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern (alternating numbers and letters). The time it takes to connect the "trail" is recorded. Reported as B - A. Range = 0 - 100+ (measured in seconds). A higher B - A score indicates poorer performance. |
Week 8
|
|
Difference in Score Between Trail Making Test-A (TMT-A) and Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B)
Time Frame: Month 3
|
TMT is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. Both parts of the Trail Making Test consist of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. In Part A, the circles are numbered 1-25, and the patient should draw lines to connect the numbers in ascending order. In Part B, the circles include both numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L); as in Part A, the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern (alternating numbers and letters). The time it takes to connect the "trail" is recorded. Reported as B - A. Range = 0 - 100+ (measured in seconds). A higher B - A score indicates poorer performance. |
Month 3
|
|
TMT-B T-Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
In TMT-B, the circles include both numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L); the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern (alternating numbers and letters).
The time is takes to connect the "trail" is recorded.
Range = 0 - 100.
A higher T-score indicates better performance
|
Baseline
|
|
TMT-B T-Score
Time Frame: Week 8
|
In TMT-B, the circles include both numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L); the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern (alternating numbers and letters).
The time is takes to connect the "trail" is recorded.
Range = 0 - 100.
A higher T-score indicates better performance
|
Week 8
|
|
TMT-B T-Score
Time Frame: Month 3
|
In TMT-B, the circles include both numbers (1-13) and letters (A-L); the patient draws lines to connect the circles in an ascending pattern (alternating numbers and letters).
The time is takes to connect the "trail" is recorded.
Range = 0 - 100.
A higher T-score indicates better performance
|
Month 3
|
|
Face-Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME-12) Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
FNAME-12 is an associative memory test where participants see a series of facial photos and names and are asked to remember the face-name pairs.
|
Baseline
|
|
Face-Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME-12) Score
Time Frame: Week 8
|
FNAME-12 is an associative memory test where participants see a series of facial photos and names and are asked to remember the face-name pairs.
|
Week 8
|
|
Face-Name Associative Memory Exam (FNAME-12) Score
Time Frame: Month 3
|
FNAME-12 is an associative memory test where participants see a series of facial photos and names and are asked to remember the face-name pairs.
|
Month 3
|
|
Letter Number Sequencing Score
Time Frame: Baseline
|
this study will use T-scores, range = 20 - 80.
A higher T-score indicates better performance.
|
Baseline
|
|
Letter Number Sequencing Score
Time Frame: Week 8
|
this study will use T-scores, range = 20 - 80.
A higher T-score indicates better performance.
|
Week 8
|
|
Letter Number Sequencing Score
Time Frame: Month 3
|
this study will use T-scores, range = 20 - 80.
A higher T-score indicates better performance.
|
Month 3
|
|
Change in Systemic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events - Specific Inquiry (SAFTEE-SI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, up to Week 8
|
SAFTEE-SI is a list of 55 symptoms.
Participants indicate how bothersome each symptom has been for them by circling the appropriate number (0-none, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe).
The total range of score is 0 - 165.
The higher the score, the more severely bothersome the symptoms are.
|
Baseline, up to Week 8
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paolo Cassano, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Dan Iosifescu, MD, NYU Langone Health and Nathan Kline Institute
- Principal Investigator: Ricardo Osorio, MD, NYU Langone Health and Nathan Kline Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20-00865
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnAlzheimer Disease | Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset | Alzheimer Disease, Late Onset | Alzheimer Disease 1 | Alzheimer Disease 2 | Alzheimer Disease 3 | Alzheimer Disease 4 | Alzheimer Disease 7 | Alzheimer Disease 17 | Alzheimer Disease 5 | Alzheimer Disease 6 | Alzheimer Disease 8 | Alzheimer Disease 10 | Alzheimer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Cognito Therapeutics, Inc.Active, not recruitingCognitive Impairment | Dementia | Alzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Cognitive Decline | Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset | Alzheimer Disease, Late Onset | MCI | Dementia Alzheimers | Mild Dementia | Dementia of Alzheimer Type | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Alzheimer Disease 1 | Dementia, Mild | Alzheimer... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityNot yet recruitingMCI With Increased Risk for Alzheimer Disease | Alzheimer s DiseaseUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Dementia Alzheimer Type | Alzheimer&Amp;#39;s Disease (AD) | Alzheimer&Amp;Amp;#39;s Disease | Mild Alzheimer&Amp;Amp;#39;s Disease | Moderate Alzheimer&Amp;Amp;#39;s Disease | Alzheimer&Amp;#39;s DementiaUnited States
-
AphiosNot yet recruitingDementia | Alzheimer Disease 1 | Alzheimer Disease 2 | Alzheimer Disease 3
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfNot yet recruitingEarly Onset Alzheimer Disease | Alzheimer Disease (AD)Germany
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Not yet recruiting
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingEnrolling by invitation
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Danyang Huichuang Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.RecruitingAlzheimer s DiseaseChina
Clinical Trials on 18F-MK-6240
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompleted[18F]MK-6240 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Tracer First-in-Human Validation Study (MK-6240-001)Alzheimer's Disease | Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment
-
Adam BrickmanNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Genentech, Inc.Completed
-
Patrick LaoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Sinotau Pharmaceutical GroupRecruitingAlzheimer Disease | Neurofibrillary TangleChina
-
LuMind IDSC FoundationTerminatedDown SyndromeUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute; Alzheimer's Clinical Trials ConsortiumRecruitingDementia | Alzheimer Disease | Down SyndromeUnited States, Spain, United Kingdom, France, Ireland
-
Tammie L. S. Benzinger, MD, PhDEnrolling by invitation
-
Yaakov SternNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingAging | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Northern California Institute of Research... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationDementia | Alzheimer Disease | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States, Canada