MITE in the Treatment of Dyspepsia After Cholecystectomy

MITE (Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets) in the Treatment of Dyspepsia After Cholecystectomy: a Multicenter, Randomized, Superior, Parallel Controlled Clinical Study

To confirm the clinical efficacy of Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets in the treatment of patients with dyspepsia after cholecystectomy (such as abdominal distension, abdominal pain/abdominal discomfort, diarrhea/fatty stool, early satiety, belching, loss of appetite, etc.) by comparing with positive control drug, to observe its safety, and to evaluate the quality of life of subjects before and after treatment

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Patients With Dyspeptic Symptoms After Cholecystectomy
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets; Drug: Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme both Pancreatin Tablet and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Tablets

Detailed Description

This study is a multi-center, randomized, superiority and parallel controlled clinical study. Third-party institutions will generate random codes according to random numbers of the software and divide them into two groups (Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets Group, Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme and Pancreatin Tablet and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Tablets Group) in a ratio of 1:1. Random numbers will be sealed and stored in radiopaque envelopes, which will be managed by a designated person not involved in the specific study.

Specific intervention measures: If dyspeptic symptoms occur after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and are randomized, the experimental group takes Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets, and the control group takes Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme both Pancreatin Tablet and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Tablets. They were registered before medication and on days 14 and 28 after medication, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at each follow-up visit

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 990
• Phase: Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: zhaohui tang, PhD; Phone Number: 13601789458; Email: tangzhaohui@yahoo.com

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Aged 18-70 years old, male or female;
2. Patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, mainly including cholecystectomy due to cholecystitis, gallstones, gallbladder polyps and other benign gallbladder tumors, non-functioning gallbladder;
3. Dyspeptic symptoms occurred 2 weeks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including: abdominal distension, abdominal pain/abdominal discomfort, diarrhea/fatty stool, early satiety, belching, loss of appetite;
4. Signed informed consent, agreed to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with abnormal liver function and renal function;
2. Patients with severe heart and lung dysfunction;
3. Patients with neurological, mental illness or other reasons can not cooperate with the study;
4. Patients with advanced malignant tumors or other serious wasting diseases, any unstable chronic diseases and acute diseases, interfere with the efficacy evaluation of this study (such as patients undergoing chemotherapy) and the completion of the trial plan;
5. Patients with biliary obstruction, acute hepatitis, etc., do not use the test drugs and control drugs, and allergic to the test drugs and control drugs;
6. Patients who have taken digestive enzymes and cholagogue drugs by themselves;
7. Pregnant and lactating women;
8. Patients who are participating in other clinical trials;
9. Patients who cannot be followed up on time.

Elimination Criteria

1. Failure to take medicine as required, that is,Failure to take medicine or missed doses ≥ 3 times within 1week;
2. Taking other digestive enzymes, cholagogues and prokinetic drugs or drugs affecting digestive enzymes and bile secretion and excretion during the study;
3. Adverse events occur, for the benefit of patients, doctors believe that the drug should not be continued; the results of such cases do not participate in the efficacy statistics, but are related to the safety evaluation.

Drop-out Criteria

1. Cases with adverse events and patients are not willing to continue participating in the study.
2. Cases who voluntarily withdrew consent from the study due to poor efficacy and inconvenience in follow-up.
3. cases lost to follow-up due to various reasons.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets; If dyspeptic symptoms occur after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and are randomized, the experimental group takes Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets. They were registered before medication and on days 14 and 28 after medication, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at each follow-up visit.	Drug: Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets; the experimental group takes Compound Azintamide Enteric-coated Tablets.They were registered before medication and on days 14 and 28 after medication, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at each follow-up visit
Placebo Comparator: Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme; If dyspeptic symptoms occur after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and are randomized, the control group takes Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme both Pancreatin Tablet and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Tablets. They were registered before medication and on days 14 and 28 after medication, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at each follow-up visit.	Drug: Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme both Pancreatin Tablet and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Tablets; the control group takes Oryz-aspergillus Enzyme both Pancreatin Tablet and Ursodeoxycholic Acid Tablets. They were registered before medication and on days 14 and 28 after medication, and gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at each follow-up visit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Symptom assessment	scored according to the severity of symptoms. severity: 0 : asymptomatic.; : The patient can recall symptoms only after being reminded.; : There are symptoms, but it does not affect daily life. 3 points: Symptoms are present, affecting daily life.	28days
Efficacy evaluation	symptom score improvement rate = (symptom score before treatment - symptom score after treatment)/symptom score before treatment × 100%. Significantly effective: symptom score improvement rate > 75%. Effective: symptom score improvement rate 50% ~ 75% (including 50%). Improvement: symptom score improvement rate of 25% ~ 50% (including 25%). Ineffective: symptom score improvement rate < 25%. Worsening: The symptom score increased after medication. Overall response rate = (number of effective cases + number of significantly effective cases)/total number of cases × 100%.	28days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The incidence of adverse events (AE)	Serious adverse events (SAE), such as death or life-threatening, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, severe disability or severely impaired organ function, etc. Adverse reaction symptoms are recorded in three levels: mild, moderate and severe, and may be related, may not be related, definitely related, and definitely not related. Mild adverse reactions: The symptoms of adverse reactions are mild and can only be remembered after a doctor's inquiry; severe adverse reactions: the main complaints of adverse reactions are strong, affecting the patient's daily life or the continuation of research; moderate adverse reactions: the severity of adverse reactions is moderate Between degree and severe. Adverse reactions include any new complaints of discomfort during the study period. If symptoms only worsen during the study, it is not considered an adverse event. Any adverse events should be actively handled	28days
Quality of life assessment	The SF-NDI scale was used to assess the impact of dyspeptic symptoms on the quality of life of subjects before and after treatment	28days
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation	Pharmacoeconomics includes cost indicators and pharmacoeconomic evaluation indicators that are ultimately used for analysis. Cost indicators include the total direct costs that patients should bear from the start of enrollment to the 28-day follow-up period. From an individual analysis perspective, they include: 1) laboratory inspection costs; 2) medical care and management costs; 3) disease diagnosis costs; 4) The cost of treatment; 5) The cost of treatment of adverse reactions and complications. Pharmacoeconomics evaluation indicators use cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio for comparison.	28days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Anticipated): March 1, 2021
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): February 1, 2022
• Study Completion (Anticipated): February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 24, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 3, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): March 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 8, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 3, 2021
• Last Verified: January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Signs and Symptoms, Digestive; Dyspepsia; Gastrointestinal Agents; Cholagogues and Choleretics; Pancrelipase; Pancreatin; Ursodeoxycholic Acid
• Other Study ID Numbers: XHEC-C-2020-049-2

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No