Oncodrivers in Malignant Pleural Effusions Associated With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Study.

May 10, 2022 updated by: Naestved Hospital

The Prevalence of Oncodrivers in Malignant Pleural Effusions Associated With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Oncological treatment of patients with disseminated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is depending on the status of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), so called oncodrivers. These can be measured in pleural fluid, but the prevalence is uncertain. In a prospective study, the research team aim to measure PD-L1, ALK and EGFR in patients with pleural fluid cytology positive for NSCLC to report the prevalence. Also, the study will investigate if the chance of obtaining oncodriver status is depending on the volume analysed and how the lack of oncodrivers influence the following work-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective, non-randomized, cohort study of patients with pleural effusion. Participants will be recruited from patients referred to the Pleura Clinic or admitted at the ward at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Næstved Hospital, Næstved or at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, which is the two regional centres for workup of pleural effusions. Patients will be referred from either general practice or other hospital departments.

Pleural fluids with cytology positive for NSCLC will be tested for oncodrivers (for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC): PD-L1, for adenocarcinomas (AC): PD-L1, ALK and EGFR).

Follow-up will be 8 weeks after inclusion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Region Sjælland
      • Næstved, Region Sjælland, Denmark, 4700
        • Recruiting
        • Næstved Sygehus, department of pulmonary medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Uffe Bødtger, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Pleural effusion known or suspected of association with NSCLC (pleural fluid cytology positive for cells from NSCLC)
  • Patients must be able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Full oncodriver status measured in any pleural fluid in current work-up
  • Inability to understand written or spoken Danish.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of oncodriver status
Time Frame: assessed at 8 weeks follow-up
Prevalence of oncodriver status (for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC): PD-L1, for adenocarcinomas (AC): PD-L1, ALK and EGFR) in pleural fluid in patients with cytology positive for pulmonary NSCLC
assessed at 8 weeks follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of adequate and inadequate pleural fluid specimens
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
Amounts of pleural fluid sent for analysis
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
Meassured in mL.
assessed at 8-week follow-up
Correlation between amounts of pleural fluid sent to the pathologist and the chance of obtaining oncodriver status
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
Number and type of additional diagnostic interventions including additional thoracentesis and cytological or histological biopsies
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
Prevalence of oncodriver status in additional diagnostic interventions
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
- Correlation between oncodriver status obtained in pleural fluid specimens and cytological or histological biopsies
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
- Proportion of work-ups where the lack of obtained oncodriver status in pleural fluid specimens leads to additional diagnostic interventions including additional thoracentesis and cytological or histological biopsies
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
- Proportion of work-ups where full oncodriver-status was obtained at the second thoracentesis
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
- Proportion of patients with pleural fluid cytology negative of NSCLC, who is diagnosed with NSCLC.
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed at 8-week follow-up
Patient assessed pain during thoracentesis
Time Frame: at day 1, 2 minutes after thoracentesis
assessed by a questionnaire containing a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale, scale 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being the worse pain)
at day 1, 2 minutes after thoracentesis
Proportion of patients experiencing pneumothorax
Time Frame: assessed at day 1, 10 minutes after thoracentesis and 8-week follow-up by evaluating the patient file
assessed at day 1, 10 minutes after thoracentesis and 8-week follow-up by evaluating the patient file
Proportion of patients experiencing bleeding
Time Frame: assessed at day 1, 10 minutes after thoracentesis and 8-week follow-up
assessed at day 1, 10 minutes after thoracentesis and 8-week follow-up
Proportion of complications leading to admission
Time Frame: assessed at 8-week follow-up
assessed by evaluating the patient file
assessed at 8-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 12, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on meassurement of PD-L1, ALK, EGFR

3
Subscribe