Ketamine + Magnesium for Chronic Cluster Headache (KETALGIA) (KETALGIA)

Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Single Infusion of Ketamine Combined With Magnesium Sulfate to Treat Refractory Chronic Cluster Headache

Chronic cluster headache (CCH) is a rare primary headache disorder, defined by episodic attacks that occur for more than one year with no remission period or with remission periods lasting < 3 months (ICHD-3 criteria). In certain cases, CCH patients become drug-resistant and continue to suffer almost daily attacks.

Ketamine appears to be effective in a variety of chronic pain conditions, such as refractory headache, and can show an enhanced analgesic effect when combined with magnesium. A single infusion of ketamine-magnesium combination has been described to reduce attacks in 17 patients with rCCH. The main outcome was a comparison of the number of daily attacks two weeks prior to the infusion and one week after (days 7-8). The number of daily attacks decreased from 4.3±2.4 before treatment to 1.3±1.0 after treatment (p<0.001). 13/17 had at least 50% response. Thus, the goal of this placebo-controlled study is to try to confirm these findings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic cluster headache (CCH) is a rare primary headache disorder, defined by episodic attacks that occur for more than one year with no remission period or with remission periods lasting < 3 months (ICHD-3 criteria). In certain cases, CCH patients become drug-resistant and continue to suffer almost daily attacks.

Ketamine appears to be effective in a variety of chronic pain conditions, such as refractory headache, and can show an enhanced analgesic effect when combined with magnesium. A single infusion of ketamine-magnesium combination has been described to reduce attacks in 17 patients with rCCH. The main outcome was a comparison of the number of daily attacks two weeks prior to the infusion and one week after (days 7-8). The number of daily attacks decreased from 4.3±2.4 before treatment to 1.3±1.0 after treatment (p<0.001). 13/17 had at least 50% response. Thus, the goal of this placebo-controlled study is to try to confirm these findings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Annecy, France, 74370
        • CH Annecy Genevois
      • Bruges, France, 33520
        • Polyclinique Jean Villar
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CHRU de Lille
      • Lyon, France, 69500
        • Hospices civils de Lyon, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • AP-HM Marseille
      • Montpellier, France, 34070
        • Clinique Beau Soleil
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • CHU de Montpellier
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • CHU Nantes, Hopital Nord Laennec
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Hopital Lariboisiere
      • Rouen, France, 76100
        • CHU Rouen
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Hôpital de Hautepierre
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Hopital Pierre Paul Riquet
      • Voiron, France, 38500
        • CHU Grenoble-Alpes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18 years
  • Chronic cluster headache diagnosis made according to ICHD-3 criteria
  • A mean of at least 2 attacks/day during the 14 days before infusion
  • Insufficient efficacy or intolerance or contra-indication to the use of the 3 main validated treatments (verapamil, lithium and sub-occipital steroids injections)
  • Stable preventive treatment for at least 7 days before infusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Contra-indication to ketamine use (uncontrolled high blood pressure, stoke history, severe cardiac failure)
  • Ketamine use during the previous year
  • Hypersensitivity to the product or their metabolites
  • Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30ml/min)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ketamine + Magnesium
patients in the experimental group will receive 0.5mg/kg of ketamine over 2 hours, diluted in 50cc of NaCl 0.9% and 3g of magnesium sulfate over 30 minutes diluted in 250cc of NaCl 0.9%.
A single infusion will be performed over 2 hours with 90 days follow-up.
Active Comparator: Control
patients in the control group will receive 25mg of hydroxyzine over 2 hours, diluted in 50cc of NaCl 0.9% and 250cc of NaCl 0.9% over 30 minutes
A single infusion will be performed over 2 hours with 90 days follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in weekly attacks between day 7 - day 13 period compared to the pre-treatment period
Time Frame: pre-treatment period and day 7-day 13 post-treatment period
Evaluate the efficacy of a single infusion of ketamine combined with magnesium sulfate compared to a control group receiving hydroxyzine (active placebo) in terms of weekly attacks between day 7 and day 13 period and pre-treatment period
pre-treatment period and day 7-day 13 post-treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of 30% responders
Time Frame: day 7 to day 90
proportion of 30% responders at various time points according to the attack diary
day 7 to day 90
Proportion of 50% responders
Time Frame: day 7 to day 90
proportion of 50% responders at various time points according to the attack diary
day 7 to day 90
Proportion of 75% responders
Time Frame: day 7 to day 90
proportion of 75% responders at various time points according to the attack diary
day 7 to day 90
week by week attacks frequency
Time Frame: day 0 to day 90
Area under the curve (AUC) for daily attacks evaluated each week between D0 and D90 (attacks diary)
day 0 to day 90
patient global impression of change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Day 15
PGIC will be completed and compared between the 2 groups
Day 15
patient global impression of change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Day 90
PGIC will be completed and compared between the 2 groups
Day 90
Infusion's safety
Time Frame: day 0
proportion of patients in each group reporting any side effect during or in the 24 hours after infusion (together with the type and intensity of these side effects)
day 0
Infusion's safety
Time Frame: day 1
proportion of patients in each group reporting any side effect during or in the 24 hours after infusion (together with the type and intensity of these side effects)
day 1
Treatment response according to initial magnesemia
Time Frame: day 7
magnesemia on the infusion day (D0) will be correlated with 50% response at D7-8 among patients receiving active treatment
day 7
Treatment response according to initial magnesemia
Time Frame: day 8
magnesemia on the infusion day (D0) will be correlated with 50% response at D7-8 among patients receiving active treatment
day 8
Attacks treatment consumption
Time Frame: day 0 to day 90
Daily attacks treatment consumption (injectable sumatriptan and oxygene)
day 0 to day 90
Direct medical cost
Time Frame: day 0 to day 90
Direct medical cost (treatments, consultations, hospitalisations) in each group and cost effectiveness ratio taking 50% responder rate as efficacy criteria
day 0 to day 90
Anxiety evolution
Time Frame: Day 15
comparison of anxiety (evaluated via the HAD scale) between groups
Day 15
Anxiety evolution
Time Frame: Day 90
comparison of anxiety (evaluated via the HAD scale) between groups
Day 90
depression evolution
Time Frame: Day 15
comparison of depression (evaluated via the HAD scale) between groups
Day 15
depression evolution
Time Frame: Day 90
comparison ofdepression (evaluated via the HAD scale) between groups
Day 90
Proportion of patients necessitating rescue therapy
Time Frame: Day 15
Proportion of patients necessitating rescue therapy (infusion of ketamine combined with magnesium)
Day 15
Change in weekly attacks between day 14 - day 20 period compared to the pre-treatment period
Time Frame: pre-treatment period and day 14 - day 20 post-treatment period
Evaluate the efficacy of a single infusion of ketamine combined with magnesium sulfate compared to a control group receiving hydroxyzine (active placebo) in terms of weekly attacks between day 14 and day 20 post-reatment period and pre-treatment period. The number of weekly attacks will be evaluated using a attacks diary that patients will complete every day.
pre-treatment period and day 14 - day 20 post-treatment period
Change in weekly attacks between day 21 - day 27 period compared to the pre-treatment period
Time Frame: pre-treatment period and day 21 - day 27 post-treatment period
Evaluate the efficacy of a single infusion of ketamine combined with magnesium sulfate compared to a control group receiving hydroxyzine (active placebo) in terms of weekly attacks between day 21 and day 27 post-reatment period and pre-treatment period. The number of weekly attacks will be evaluated using a attacks diary that patients will complete every day.
pre-treatment period and day 21 - day 27 post-treatment period
Change in weekly attacks between day 28 - day 34 period compared to the pre-treatment period
Time Frame: pre-treatment period and day 28 - day 34 post-treatment period
Evaluate the efficacy of a single infusion of ketamine combined with magnesium sulfate compared to a control group receiving hydroxyzine (active placebo) in terms of weekly attacks between day 28 and day 34 post-treatment period and pre-treatment period. The number of weekly attacks will be evaluated using a attacks diary that patients will complete every day.
pre-treatment period and day 28 - day 34 post-treatment period
Adverse events assessment
Time Frame: D0 to D90
D0 to D90
assessment of blind quality
Time Frame: Day 0
A blinding questionnaire will be systematically used to assess the quality of the blind. It will be completed by each patient 30 minutes after the end of the 1st infusion at day 0 (Visit 1). The patient will be asked what treatment he thinks he has received.
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xavier MOISSET, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Chronic Cluster Headache

Clinical Trials on Ketamine + Magnesium sulfate (drug combination)

Subscribe