- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04816721
A Study to Evaluate EDP 938 Regimens in Children With RSV (RSVPEDs)
A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, 2-PART STUDY TO EVALUATE EDP-938 REGIMENS IN SUBJECTS AGED 28 DAYS TO 36 MONTHS INFECTED WITH RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS (RSV)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bahía Blanca, Argentina
- Hospital Interzonal Dr Jose Penna
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1425
- Clínica Privada del Sol
-
Río Cuarto, Argentina
- Instituto Medico Rio Cuarto
-
Villa Regina, Argentina
- Clinica Central S.A
-
-
Buenos Aires
-
Mar Del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Clinica del Niño y la Familia
-
-
-
-
-
Southport, Australia
- Gold Coast University Hospital
-
-
New South Wales
-
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
- Sydney Children's Hospital - Randwick
-
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead
-
-
-
-
-
Curitiba, Brazil, 80060-900
- Universidade Federal do Parana - Hospital de Clínicas
-
Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, 14015-010
- Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto
-
-
Rio Grande Do Sul
-
Passo Fundo, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 99010
- Instituto Mederi de Pesquisa e Saude
-
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035
- Hospital De Clinicas De Porto Alegre
-
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035
- Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital - Porto Alegre
-
-
-
-
-
Erlangen, Germany
- Universitatsklinikum Erlangen
-
Sankt Augustin, Germany
- Asklepios Klinik Sankt Augustin
-
-
Bundesland
-
Marburg, Bundesland, Germany, 35043
- Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Gießen
-
-
-
-
-
Be'er Sheva, Israel
- Soroka University Medical Center
-
Haifa, Israel
- Carmel Medical Center
-
Haifa, Israel, 3109601
- Rambam Health Care
-
Jerusalem, Israel
- Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopu
-
Petach Tikva, Israel, 4920235
- Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2447
- Kyung Hee University Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
- Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 1830
- Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University
-
-
-
-
-
Mexico City, Mexico, 04530
- Instituto Nacional de Pediatría
-
Mexico City, Mexico
- Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez
-
Mexico City, Mexico
- Karla Adriana Espinosa Bautista
-
Monterrey, Mexico
- IESCI Clinical Research
-
Querétaro, Mexico
- PanAmerican Clinical Research
-
Querétaro, Mexico
- SMIQ S de R.L de C.V
-
-
Prados
-
Guadalajara, Prados, Mexico, 44670
- PanAmerican Clinical Research Mexico - Guadalajara
-
-
-
-
Wellington
-
Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand
- Wellington Regional Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Bydgoszcz, Poland
- IN-VIVO Bydgoszcz
-
Łódź, Poland
- Wojewódzkie Wielospecjalistyczne Centrum Onkologii i Traumatologii im. M. Kopernika w Łodzi
-
-
-
-
-
Bucharest, Romania
- Institutul National pentru Sanatatea Mamei si Copilului "Alessandrescu-Rusescu"
-
-
Brașov
-
Braşov, Brașov, Romania
- Spital Clinic de Urgenta Pentru Copii Brasov
-
-
Târgu Mureș
-
Târgu-Mureş, Târgu Mureș, Romania
- Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Targu Mures
-
-
-
-
-
Johannesburg, South Africa
- Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital
-
Soweto, South Africa, 2013
- Wits Clinical Research
-
-
Durban
-
Westville, Durban, South Africa
- Life Westville Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
-
Lleida, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Clinico San Carlos
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid
-
Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
-
Madrid, Spain
- Unidad de Ensayos Clínicos Pediátricos
-
Málaga, Spain
- Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga
-
Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
-
Tarragona, Spain
- Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII de Tarragona
-
-
-
-
-
Hsinchu, Taiwan
- HsinChu MacKay Memorial Hospital
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung Branch
-
Taichung, Taiwan
- Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
-
Taipei, Taiwan
- Taipei Mackay Memorial Hospital
-
-
Taipei
-
Taipei city, Taipei, Taiwan, 100229
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
-
Taoyuan
-
Taoyuan City, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
- Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical Foundation
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
- St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Nottinghamshire
-
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
-
-
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
- Memorial Care Miller Children's and Women's Hospital
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- University of California Davis
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32827
- Nemours Children's Hospital
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
- South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare
-
-
Idaho
-
Rexburg, Idaho, United States, 83440
- Rexburg Pediatrics
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Norton Children's Research Institute
-
-
Louisiana
-
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States, 70508
- MedPharmics - Lafayette
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71101
- LSU Health
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71103
- Willis-Knighton Health System
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Boston Children's Hospital - Division of Adolescent/Youth Adult Medicine
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- Medical University of South Carolina
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38103
- Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
-
-
Texas
-
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78411
- Driscoll Children's Hospital
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75207
- Children's Health Specialty Center Dallas Campus
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female who is either ≥6 months to ≤36 months (for Age Group 1) or ≥28 days to <6 months (for Age Group 2), defined at the time of randomization. Subjects in Age Group 2 must have been born ≥29 weeks of gestation to be eligible.
- Subjects diagnosed with RSV infection
- Subjects with signs of an acute respiratory illness with onset ≤7 days for Part 1 and ≤5 days for Part 2 before the time of signing the ICF
- In the Investigator's opinion, the subject's caregiver understands and is able to comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and protocol-stated restrictions, and the subject is likely to complete the study as planned
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of or anticipated need for invasive mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary bypass, hemodialysis, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; or subjects who are not expected to survive the current illness
- Underlying immune deficiency, (e.g., from confirmed human immunodeficiency virus infection or use of an immunosuppressive medication except immunoglobulin A deficiency)
- Receipt of (within 12 months before Screening) or on a waiting list for a bone marrow, stem cell, or solid organ transplant, or who received radiation or chemotherapy (within 12 months before screening)
- Receiving chronic oxygen therapy at home before admission
- Subjects whose mother received an investigational RSV vaccination while pregnant with the subject if they were born at term (≥37 weeks of gestation) and are less than 12 months of age
- In Part 2, subjects dosed with an investigational or approved medication that is intended to prevent or treat RSV infection within the following times before the first dose of study drug: ribavirin 35 days; palivizumab 100 days; nirsevimab 350 days; other RSV-specific monoclonal antibody 5 half-lives of the specific antibody; RSV vaccines 12 months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EDP-938
EDP-938, oral suspension, once daily for 5 days
|
Oral suspension
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching placebo, orally, once daily for 5 days
|
Placebo oral suspension to match EDP-938
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1: Concentrations of EDP-938 in Plasma
Time Frame: 3 hours post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 2 (hospitalized participants only), Day 3, and Day 5
|
Plasma concentrations of EDP-938 were assessed at the designated time points.
|
3 hours post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 2 (hospitalized participants only), Day 3, and Day 5
|
|
Part 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
TEAEs were defined as any event, side effect, or untoward medical occurrence in a participant enrolled in a clinical study whether or not it was considered to have a causal relationship to the study drug and first occurred or worsened during the post-baseline phase compared to baseline.
Clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs and clinical laboratory results were reported as TEAEs.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Model-Adjusted Daily Change From Baseline in Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Shedding in Nasal Swab Samples
Time Frame: Baseline and pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9, and 14
|
Daily change from baseline in RSV shedding was defined as the daily change from baseline in RSV ribonucleic acid (RNA) viral load and was measured using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) from nasal swabs.
The model included treatment group (EDP-938, placebo) and Day (3, 5, 9, and 14) as fixed effect, associated baseline, and treatment group by Day interaction term as factors.
An unstructured covariance matrix was imposed.
The Satterthwaite approximation is used to estimate the denominator degrees of freedom.
|
Baseline and pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9, and 14
|
|
Pooled Population: Model-Adjusted Daily Change From Baseline in RSV Shedding in Nasal Swab Samples
Time Frame: Baseline and pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9, and 14
|
Daily change from baseline in RSV shedding was defined as the daily change from baseline in RSV RNA viral load and was measured using RT-qPCR from nasal swabs.
The model included treatment group (EDP-938, placebo) and Day (3, 5, 9, and 14) as fixed effect, associated baseline, and treatment group by Day interaction term as factors.
An unstructured covariance matrix was imposed.The Satterthwaite approximation is used to estimate the denominator degrees of freedom.
|
Baseline and pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9, and 14
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Part 1 and Part 2: Area Under the Curve (AUC) for RSV RNA Viral Load
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 through pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
The RSV RNA viral load was measured using RT-qPCR from nasal swabs.
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoid rule.
The AUC was calculated based on all available assessments collected on Days 1, 3, 5, 9 and 14 and the actual date/time of each assessment was used for the calculation.
|
Pre-dose on Day 1 through pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
|
Pooled Population: AUC of Change From Baseline in RSV RNA Viral Load
Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) through pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
The RSV RNA viral load was measured using RT-qPCR from nasal swabs.
The AUC was calculated using the trapezoid rule.
The AUC was calculated based on all available assessments collected on Days 1, 3, 5, 9 and 14 and the actual date/time of each assessment was used for the calculation.
The model included treatment group (EDP-938, placebo) and Day (3, 5, 9, and 14) as fixed effect, associated baseline, and treatment group by day interaction term as factors.
An unstructured covariance matrix was imposed.
The Satterthwaite approximation was used to estimate the denominator degrees of freedom.
|
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) through pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
|
Part 1 and Part 2: Percentage of Participants With RSV RNA Viral Load Below the Limit of Detection (LOD)
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
The RSV RNA viral load was measured using RT-qPCR from nasal swabs.
|
Pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
|
Pooled Population: Percentage of Participants With RSV RNA Viral Load Below the LOD
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
The RSV RNA viral load was measured using RT-qPCR from nasal swabs.
|
Pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9 and 14
|
|
Part 1 and Part 2: Time to RSV RNA Viral Load Being Undetectable
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to RSV RNA viral load being undetectable was calculated as: first date of RSV RNA viral load target not detected (TND) after which no further samples had detectable RSV RNA viral load - date of first dose.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Time to RSV RNA Viral Load Being Undetectable
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to RSV RNA viral load being undetectable was calculated as: first date of RSV RNA viral load TND after which no further samples had detectable RSV RNA viral load - date of first dose.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
TEAEs were defined as any event, side effect, or untoward medical occurrence in a participant enrolled in a clinical study whether or not it was considered to have a causal relationship to the study drug and first occurred or worsened during the post-baseline phase compared to baseline.
Clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs and clinical laboratory results were reported as TEAEs.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Number of Participants Who Experienced a TEAE
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
TEAEs were defined as any event, side effect, or untoward medical occurrence in a participant enrolled in a clinical study whether or not it was considered to have a causal relationship to the study drug and first occurred or worsened during the post-baseline phase compared to baseline.
Clinically significant changes from baseline in vital signs and clinical laboratory results were reported as TEAEs.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Concentrations of EDP-938 in Plasma
Time Frame: 3 hours post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 2 (hospitalized participants only), Day 3, and Day 5
|
Plasma concentrations of EDP-938 were assessed at the designated time points.
|
3 hours post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 2 (hospitalized participants only), Day 3, and Day 5
|
|
Pooled Population: Concentrations of EDP-938 in Plasma
Time Frame: 3 hours post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 2 (hospitalized participants only), Day 3, and Day 5
|
Plasma concentrations of EDP-938 were assessed at the designated time points.
|
3 hours post-dose on Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 2 (hospitalized participants only), Day 3, and Day 5
|
|
Part 2: Time to First Hospital Discharge for Hospitalized Participants
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to first discharge for participants who were hospitalized at randomization was calculated as: date/time of first discharge - date/time of first dose with conversion to days.
For participants with continuous hospitalization, the last date of discharge from the continuous hospitalization was used.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Time to First Hospital Discharge for Hospitalized Participants
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to first discharge for participants who were hospitalized at randomization was calculated as: date/time of first discharge - date/time of first dose with conversion to days.
For participants with continuous hospitalization, the last date of discharge from the continuous hospitalization was used.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Time to Use of Oxygen for Hospitalized Participants Who Were Not Receiving Oxygen at the Time They Received the First Dose of Study Drug
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
For participants were were hospitalized at randomization, time to use of oxygen for hospitalization participants who were not receiving oxygen at the time they received the first dose of study drug was calculated as: first date/time of receiving oxygen - date/time of first dose of study drug with conversion to days.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Time to Use of Oxygen for Hospitalized Participants Who Were Not Receiving Oxygen at the Time They Received the First Dose of Study Drug
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
For participants were were hospitalized at randomization, time to use of oxygen for hospitalization participants who were not receiving oxygen at the time they received the first dose of study drug was calculated as: first date/time of receiving oxygen - date/time of first dose of study drug with conversion to days.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Hospitalized Participants Who Required Oxygen Supplementation or Had an Increased Oxygen Requirement After the First Dose of Study Drug
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
The numerator in the percentage calculation was defined by the number of participants who developed a new requirement for oxygen supplementation or new increase in oxygen requirements after the first dose of study drug, based on the response of "yes" to the "Is this an increase of oxygen supplementation compared to previous use?"
question on the Oxygen Supplementation case report form (CRF).
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Percentage of Hospitalized Participants Who Required Oxygen Supplementation or Had an Increased Oxygen Requirement After the First Dose of Study Drug
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
The numerator in the percentage calculation was defined by the number of participants who developed a new requirement for oxygen supplementation or new increase in oxygen requirements after the first dose of study drug, based on the response of "yes" to the "Is this an increase of oxygen supplementation compared to previous use?"
question on the Oxygen Supplementation CRF.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Time to Mechanical Ventilation for Hospitalized Participants
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to mechanical ventilation for participants who were hospitalized at randomization was calculated as: first date/time of mechanical ventilation - date/time of first dose of study drug with conversion to days.
Participants who were on mechanical ventilation before their first dose of study drug were excluded from the analysis.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Time to Mechanical Ventilation for Hospitalized Participants
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to mechanical ventilation for participants who were hospitalized at randomization was calculated as: first date/time of mechanical ventilation - date/time of first dose of study drug with conversion to days.
Participants who were on mechanical ventilation before their first dose of study drug were excluded from the analysis.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Hospitalized Participants Who Required Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
The numerator in the percentage calculation was defined by the number of participants who developed a new requirement for mechanical ventilation after the first dose of study drug.
Participants on mechanical ventilation prior to the first dose of study drug were excluded from analysis.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Percentage of Hospitalized Participants Who Required Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
The numerator in the percentage calculation was defined by the number of participants who developed a new requirement for mechanical ventilation after the first dose of study drug.
Participants on mechanical ventilation prior to the first dose of study drug were excluded from analysis.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Hospitalized Participants Who Died During the Study
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
The percentage of hospitalized participants who died during the study included deaths from any cause.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Percentage of Hospitalized Participants Who Died During the Study
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
The percentage of hospitalized participants who died during the study included deaths from any cause.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Time to Hospitalization for Initial Outpatients Who Were Subsequently Hospitalized
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to hospitalization for initial outpatients who are not hospitalized at randomization but subsequently hospitalized was calculated as: first date/time of hospitalization - date/time of first dose with conversion to days.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Time to Hospitalization for Initial Outpatients Who Were Subsequently Hospitalized
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Time to hospitalization for initial outpatients who are not hospitalized at randomization but subsequently hospitalized was calculated as: first date/time of hospitalization - date/time of first dose with conversion to days.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Percentage of Outpatients Who Were Subsequently Hospitalized or Died
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Participants who were hospitalized at randomization were excluded from the analysis.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Pooled Population: Percentage of Outpatients Who Were Subsequently Hospitalized or Died
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 28
|
Participants who were hospitalized at randomization were excluded from the analysis.
The 95% confidence interval was reported using the Clopper Pearson confidence interval methods.
|
Day 1 to Day 28
|
|
Part 2: Time to Resolution of Symptoms for Outpatients Who Were Not Hospitalized
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 14
|
Resolution of symptoms was defined as the first of 2 consecutive timepoints where each of the seven symptoms assessed by the Parent/Caregiver Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Foundation (ReSVinet) score was 0 (not present) or 1 (mild). Time to resolution of symptoms for outpatients who were not hospitalized was calculated as: first date/time of resolution of symptoms - date/time of first dose with conversion to days. Participants who did not achieve resolution and had not been followed through the Day 14 visit or completed the Day 14 questionnaire were censored at Day 14. During the study, the parent(s)/caregiver(s) assessed the severity of RSV-related signs and symptoms. The ReSVinet assessed 7 symptoms, with each symptom being rated from 0 (not present) to 3 (severe), apart from fever which was scored from 0-2. The full range was 0 to 20 with higher scores representing more severe disease. |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
|
Pooled Population: Time to Resolution of Symptoms for Outpatients Who Were Not Hospitalized
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 14
|
Resolution of symptoms was defined as the first of 2 consecutive timepoints where each of the seven symptoms assessed by the Parent/Caregiver ReSVinet score was 0 (not present) or 1 (mild). Time to resolution of symptoms for outpatients who were not hospitalized was calculated as: first date/time of resolution of symptoms - date/time of first dose with conversion to days. Participants who did not achieve resolution and had not been followed through the Day 14 visit or completed the Day 14 questionnaire were censored at Day 14. During the study, the parent(s)/caregiver(s) assessed the severity of RSV-related signs and symptoms. The ReSVinet assessed 7 symptoms, with each symptom being rated from 0 (not present) to 3 (severe), apart from fever which was scored from 0-2. The full range was 0 to 20 with higher scores representing more severe disease. |
Day 1 to Day 14
|
|
Part 1: Daily Change From Baseline in RSV Shedding in Nasal Swab Samples
Time Frame: Baseline to pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9, and Day 14
|
Daily change from baseline in RSV shedding in nasal swab samples was defined as the absolute daily change from baseline in RSV RNA viral load and measured using RT-qPCR from nasal swabs.
|
Baseline to pre-dose on Days 3, 5, 9, and Day 14
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- EDP 938-201
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncNot yet recruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) | RSV Infection | RSV
-
Nicola IrwinThe University of New South Wales; Kirby InstituteCompletedRespiratory Syncytial Virus Hospitalizations | Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection | Respiratory Syncytial Virus ImmunizationAustralia
-
Nicola IrwinCompletedRespiratory Syncytial Virus Hospitalizations | Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prevention | Respiratory Syncytial Viral (RSV) InfectionAustralia
-
MAXVAX Biotechnology Limited Liability CompanyNot yet recruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)Australia
-
MAXVAX Biotechnology Limited Liability CompanyHenan Center for Disease Control and PreventionNot yet recruiting
-
PfizerRecruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)Japan
-
MAXVAX Biotechnology Limited Liability CompanySichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Hunan Provincial Center... and other collaboratorsRecruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)China
-
Emory UniversityOpen PhilanthropyActive, not recruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)United States
-
PfizerActive, not recruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)United States
-
Menzies School of Health ResearchUniversity of Sydney; Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteNot yet recruitingRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) | Respiratory Infection VirusAustralia
Clinical Trials on EDP-938
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncCompletedRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)United States
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, InchVIVO Services LimitedCompleted
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncCompletedRSV InfectionUnited States, Taiwan, South Africa, Bulgaria, Spain, Malaysia, Mexico, Argentina, Slovakia, Colombia, Czechia, Poland
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncPPDCompletedRespiratory Syncytial VirusUnited States, New Zealand, Bulgaria, Argentina, Poland, South Africa, Ukraine
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncPharmaceutical Research AssociatesCompleted
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncTerminatedRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsSpain, Korea, Republic of, Israel, Canada, United States, Italy, France, Belgium, Brazil, Taiwan, Greece, Argentina, Mexico, South Africa, China, Poland, Colombia, Turkey, United Kingdom
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncICON Clinical Research; Triangle BiostatisticsCompletedNon-Alcoholic SteatohepatitisUnited States, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, France, Puerto Rico
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncTerminatedNon-Alcoholic SteatohepatitisUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico, United Kingdom, Argentina, Germany
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncTerminatedChronic Hepatitis B Virus InfectionNew Zealand
-
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, IncCompleted