Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Cannabidiol in Treating Severe Behavioural Problems in Children and Adolescents With Intellectual Disability

August 31, 2025 updated by: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Cannabidiol to Treat Severe Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents With Intellectual Disability

This is a multi-site, double-blind, parallel group, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 140 participants comparing oral purified cannabidiol isolate (CBD) with placebo in reducing Severe Behavioral Problems (SBP) at 8 weeks in children aged 6 - 18 years with Intellectual Disability (ID). Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either CBD or placebo.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

132

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • The Children's Hospital at Westmead
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Children's Hospital
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
        • Royal Children's Hospital / Murdoch Children's Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females aged 6 - 18 years of age;
  2. DSM-5 diagnosis of intellectual disability (ID):

    1. Full scale IQ < 70 on standardized cognitive assessment. Testing results must be sighted by the investigators and performed within two years of enrollment. In the event that records of prior testing are unavailable or the assessment was more than 2 years prior, IQ will be estimated using the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-II.
    2. Deficit in adaptive function (basis for severity rating of ID in DSM-5) in at least one activity of life on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (derives scores in Communication, Daily Living Skills and Socialization domains, and a Global Adaptive score). If records of prior testing are unavailable or the assessment was more than 2 years prior, this will be completed by the parent or guardian.
  3. SBP: Defined as scores of:

    1. 18 or higher on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale (ABC-I), and
    2. moderate or higher on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale;
  4. No changes in either medication or other interventions in the 4 weeks prior to randomization, and intention to remain on same dose for the duration of the study;
  5. Written informed consent from parent or legal guardian;
  6. Participant and family have the ability to comply with the protocol requirements, in the opinion of the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-English speaking parents;
  2. Psychosis;
  3. Taking clobazam, mTOR inhibitors (e.g sirolimus, tacrolimus), anti-cancer agents, citalopram >20mg/day, escitalopram >10mg/day.;
  4. Abnormal liver function tests: defined as ALT > twice ULN;
  5. Abnormal renal function tests: defined as creatinine > ULN
  6. Current use of medicinal cannabis, or use in the 4 weeks prior to screening;
  7. Pregnant or intending to become pregnant during the study, or breastfeeding;
  8. Known allergy to cannabidiol or cannabis products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cannabidiol 100mg/ml

The starting dose of cannabidiol (CBD) will be 5 mg/kg/day and will be administered orally twice daily in doses of 2.5 mg/kg (up titration phase from day 1 to 7). After one week, the dose of CBD will be increased to 10 mg/kg/day in two daily doses of 5mg/kg (8-week maintenance phase from day 8 to 63). On completion of the maintenance phase the dose of CBD will be decreased to 5mg/kg/day for one week (day 64 to 70), after which the CBD administration will cease.

A ceiling dose of 1000mg/day will be administered to all participants weighing 100kg or greater. These participants will receive a dose of 500mg/day during up- and down-titration.

Doses will be rounded to the nearest 10mg (0.1mL).

Cannabidiol (CBD) isolate 100mg/ml in MCT oil oral solution, manufactured by THC Pharma
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

The control group will receive placebo medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) oil which is indistinguishable from the active medication in appearance, smell and taste.

Dose will be matched for volume to the cannabidiol arm, and administered twice daily for 10 weeks (including up- and down-titration).

MCT oil and flavoring solution, also manufactured by THC Pharma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability (ABC-I) subscale total score at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 15 item parent-rated questionnaire, used to measure Severe Behavioral Problems in children
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total scores of the four remaining subscales of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
43 parent-rated items assessing: Social withdrawal, Stereotypic behavior, Hyperactivity/Noncompliance and Inappropriate Speech
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Comparison between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms of clinician ratings on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement at day 64. Data will be presented as the proportion of participants in each arm with a rating suggesting improvement
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a single item clinician-rated summary measure of improvement
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Parent Rated Anxiety Scale-ASD at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 25 item parent-rated measure of anxiety in youth with ASD
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Child & Adolescent Scale of Participation at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 20 item parent-rated questionnaire that includes sub-scales for participation in home, school, and community activities
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the weighted total score of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU-9D) at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 9 item parent-rated, preference-weighted measure used to calculate quality adjusted life years for children
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 26 item parent-rated questionnaire assessing sleep difficulties in children
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Assessment of Quality of Life 4D (AQOL-4D) at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 12 item self-report health-related instrument used to calculate quality adjusted life years for parents
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 25 item parent report measure that includes subscales assessing family interaction, parenting, emotional and material wellbeing, and disability-related support.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 21 item self-rated assessment of parent mental health, including symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Mean difference between the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms on the total score of the Autism Parenting Stress Index at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This is a 13 item self-rated measure of 3 categories of stress drivers in parents: core social disability, difficult behavior, physical issues
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
The frequency of adverse events as reported on the modified version of the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (LAEP) at day 64 will be summarised across the cannabidiol 100mg/ml and placebo arms
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Completed by the parent or guardian, the LAEP was designed to capture known side-effects of anti-epileptic medication. The modified version includes additional items to ascertain other known side-effects of CBD. This measure includes 34 items.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the health sector cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol vs placebo in terms of Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability (ABC-I) scores at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This involves calculation of an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): health sector costs (CBD-placebo) divided by incremental ABC-I scores. Health sector costs will be calculated through: (1) Estimation of intervention costs from the study's financial records; (2) A brief Resource Use Questionnaire, completed by parents at day 64, which will capture medication and health sector resource use associated with their child's behaviour across the 8 week intervention period.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Comparing the societal cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol vs placebo in terms of Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Irritability (ABC-I) scores at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This involves calculation of an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): societal costs (CBD-placebo) divided by incremental ABC-I scores. Societal costs will be calculated through a brief Resource Use Questionnaire, completed by parents at day 64, which will capture societal resource use and lost productivity associated with their child's behaviour across the 8 week intervention period.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Comparing the health sector cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol vs placebo in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years calculated from the CHU-9D at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This involves calculation of an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): health sector costs (CBD-placebo) divided by incremental Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from CHU-9D . Health sector costs will be calculated through: (1) Estimation of intervention costs from the study's financial records; (2) A brief Resource Use Questionnaire, completed by parents at day 64, which will capture medication and health sector resource use associated with their child's behaviour across the 8 week intervention period.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Comparing the societal cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol vs placebo in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years calculated from the CHU-9D at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This involves calculation of an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): societal costs (CBD-placebo) divided by incremental Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from CHU-9D . Societal costs will be calculated through a brief Resource Use Questionnaire, completed by parents at day 64, which will capture societal resource use and lost productivity associated with their child's behaviour across the 8 week intervention period.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Comparing the health sector cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol vs placebo in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years calculated from the AQOL-4D at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This involves calculation of an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): health sector costs (CBD-placebo) divided by incremental Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from AQOL-4D . Health sector costs will be calculated through: (1) Estimation of intervention costs from the study's financial records; (2) A brief Resource Use Questionnaire, completed by parents at day 64, which will capture medication and health sector resource use associated with their child's behaviour across the 8 week intervention period.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
Comparing the societal cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol vs placebo in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years calculated from the AQOL-4D at day 64
Time Frame: At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)
This involves calculation of an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): societal costs (CBD-placebo) divided by incremental Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) from AQOL-4D . Societal costs will be calculated through a brief Resource Use Questionnaire, completed by parents at day 64, which will capture societal resource use and lost productivity associated with their child's behaviour across the 8 week intervention period.
At day 64 (end of maintenance treatment period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Daryl Efron, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 9, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified data set collected for this analysis of the RCT of CBD in children and adolescents with ID will be available six months after publication of the primary outcome. The study protocol and analysis plan will also be available. The data must be obtained from the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Prior to releasing any data the following are required: a data access agreement must be signed between relevant parties, the 'RCT of CBD in children and adolescents with ID' Trial Steering Committee must see and approve the data analysis plan describing how the data will be analysed, there must be an agreement around appropriate acknowledgment and any additional costs involved must be covered. Should the Trial Steering Committee be unavailable, this role is delegated to the Murdoch Children's Research Institute. Data will only be shared with a recognized research organisation which has approved the proposed analysis plan.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication of primary outcome

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

1) Data access agreement; 2) approval by Trial Steering Committee; 3) recognized research institutions.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intellectual Disability

Clinical Trials on Cannabidiol Oil

Subscribe