Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy Combined With Static Magnetic Field in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis

August 8, 2025 updated by: Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal Junior, University of Nove de Julho

Evaluation of the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy Combined With Static Magnetic Field (PBMT-sMF) on Temporary Pain Relief in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most frequently encountered lesions affecting the upper extremity and is the most common cause of elbow pain in adults. It occurs on the lateral side of the elbow where the common extensors originate from the lateral epicondyle. LE can be considered an overuse injury which occurs on the lateral side of the elbow in the extensor tendons with repetitive micro-trauma. The clinical presentation of LE involves a painful or burning sensation over the humeral insertion of the common extensor tendons. Despite the high incidence of LE, optimal treatment has not been established. Treatment options include therapeutic exercise, bracing, shock wave or ultrasound therapy , but many of them lack sufficient evidence of beneficial effects. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) alone or combined with static magnetic field (PBMT-sMF) has been shown to stimulate tendon healing, this suggests that therapy using laser or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is efficacious for the symptoms associated with epicondylitis. According to the favorable results of PBMT-sMF in tendons repair processes, this type of therapy can be used as a therapeutic tool for management in epicondylitis, therefore, more investigations are necessary to establish the ideal parameters. Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate the effects of PBMT-sMF, in the appropriate parameters, on degree of pain and quality of life of patients with lateral epicondylitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

To achieve the proposed objective it will be performed a multi-center, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, with voluntary patients with lateral epicondylitis. Fifty patients will be randomly allocated to two treatment groups: 1. Active PBMT-sMF (MR5® Prototype Device) or Placebo PBMT-sMF (MR5® Prototype Device). The patients will be treated by a blinded therapist.

The patients randomly allocated to the different groups will be subjected to treatment two times a week for three consecutive weeks, each procedure administration three to four days apart.

The study will contain five phases: 1) pre-procedure activities; 2) pre-procedure assessment phase; 3) procedure administration phase; 4) procedure administration phase measures; 5) post-procedure administration phase.

The outcomes measured will be: degree of pain, forearm pain and disability, grip strength, TNF-α levels, subject satisfaction with overall outcome rating, perceived group assignment and adverse events.

The outcomes will be obtained at the stabilization phase (pre-procedure activities), baseline (pre-procedure assessment phase), 24 hours after the end of the treatment (procedure administration phase measures), and 30 days after the end of the treatment (post-procedure administration phase).

Statistical analysis:

  1. The primary statistical method to analyze the primary endpoint will be Fisher's exact test to compare the proportion of success between the test (Active PBMT-sMF) and the control (Placebo PBMT-sMF) groups, considering that randomization has been diligently conducted and important covariates between the two groups are well balanced. Statistical significance will be set at p<0.05.
  2. The secondary outcomes that are continuous variables will be analyzed through parametric analysis using ANCOVA. Statistical significance will be set at p<0.05.
  3. For patient satisfaction, measured through a Likert Scale, the data will be reduced to the nominal level by combining all agree and disagree responses into two categories of "accept" and "reject". Differences in satisfaction with Study Outcome Ratings between procedure groups at both evaluated time-points, and any change between. The chi-square will be used after this transformation. Statistical significance will be set at p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • Laboratory of Phototherapy and Innovative Technologies in Health
      • São Paulo, Brazil, 01504-001
        • Laboratory of Phototherapy and Innovative Technologies in Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of pain around the lateral epicondyle for at least 1 month;
  • Self-reported Degree of Pain rating on the 0-100 VAS pain scale for the lateral epicondyle region is 50 or greater;
  • Tenderness localized to the epicondyle and anterodistal region of the epicondyle with palpation;
  • 2 of 4 positive results of provocative tests comprising of Maudsley's, Cozen's, Thomsen and Mill's tests;
  • Aged between 18 and 50 years;
  • Both genders;
  • Patients fluent in Portuguese.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hemophilia or any type of blood clotting disorder;
  • chronic immune impairment neoplasia;
  • cancer or treatment for cancer in the past 6 months, including tumors of the spinal cord;
  • diabetes Type 1;
  • significant heart conditions including CHF and implantable heart devices such as a pacemaker;
  • current, active chronic pain disease: chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, endometriosis, inflammatory bowel disease, interstitial cystitis diabetic neuropathic pain;
  • neurologic deficits;
  • cervical radiculopathy;
  • peripheral nerve disease;
  • rheumatoid arthritis;
  • shoulder disease;
  • radial tunnel syndrome;
  • previous surgery of the affected upper extremities;
  • congenital or acquired bony deformity in the ipsilateral upper extremity;
  • bilateral epicondylosis;
  • secondary orthopedic problems;
  • the initiation of opioid analgesia or corticosteroid or analgesic injection interventions within the previous 6 months;
  • local corticosteroids and/or botulinum toxin (Botox®) injection for Lateral Epicondyle pain relief within the prior 30 days;
  • medical tx; such as chiropractic care and acupuncture within last 30 days;
  • physical therapy intervention on the upper extremity in the previous year;
  • active infection, wound, or other external trauma to the areas to be treated with the laser;
  • medical, physical, or other contraindications for, or sensitivity to, light therapy;
  • serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in past two years;
  • pregnant, breast feeding, or planning pregnancy prior to the end of study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active PBMT-sMF
Active PBMT-sMF will be applied two times a week (three to four days apart), for three consecutive weeks, yielding six treatment sessions.
The Active PBMT-sMF will be applied using MRM® MR5 Prototype manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical (Solon, OH, USA). PBMT-sMF will be applied using the direct contact method with light pressure on the skin. The PBMT-sMF will be applied in four regions of the epicondyle and the application time will be 60 seconds per region. The total dose of PBMT-sMF will be 108,30 J per treatment session.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo PBMT-sMF
Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied two times a week (three to four days apart), for three consecutive weeks, yielding six treatment sessions.
The Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied using MRM® MR5 Prototype manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical (Solon, OH, USA). Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied using the direct contact method with light pressure on the skin. The Placebo PBMT-sMF will be applied in four regions of the epicondyle and the application time will be 60 seconds per region. The total dose of Placebo PBMT-sMF will be 0 J per treatment session and the sMF will be turned off. The sounds and signals emitted from the device as well as the information displayed on the screen will be identical, regardless of the type of treatment (active or placebo).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of Pain Rating (VAS)
Time Frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment)
Degree of pain rating will be measured by 0-100 horizontal Visual Analog Pain Scale, with with 0 being 'no pain' and 100 'the worst possible pain'
3 weeks (end of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Forearm Pain and Disability
Time Frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Were measured using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), a 15-item questionnaire comprising five items related to pain and ten items related to function. Each item is rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain or difficulty and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain or complete inability to perform the activity. The pain subscale score is obtained by summing the five pain items, yielding a maximum score of 50. The function subscale is calculated by summing the ten function items and dividing the total by 2, also resulting in a maximum score of 50. The total PRTEE score is the sum of the pain and function subscale scores, ranging from 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (maximum pain and disability), with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
The grip strength will be measured using a digital grip dynamometer type Jamar® Plus Digital Hand Dynamometer.
3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) Levels
Time Frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
The TNF-α levels will be measured by blood samples through the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Subject Satisfaction With Overall Outcome Rating
Time Frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Subject satisfaction will be measured by 1-item Likert Scale. The scale uses the following responses: 5 = Very Satisfied; 4 = Somewhat Satisfied; 3 = Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 1 = Not at All Satisfied. Highest scores indicates better satisfaction.
3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Presence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Adverse events will be measured by report.
3 weeks (end of treatment) and 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Degree of Pain Rating (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.
Degree of pain rating will be measured by 0-100 horizontal Visual Analog Pain Scale, with with 0 being 'no pain' and 100 'the worst possible pain'
4 weeks after the conclusion of the treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal Junior, PhD, University of Nove de Julho

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lateral Epicondylitis

Clinical Trials on Active PBMT-sMF

Subscribe