A Gender-Enhanced Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Information-Motivational Workshop for Young South African Women (Masibambane)

May 26, 2024 updated by: Susie Hoffman, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Developing a Gender-Enhanced Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Information-Motivational Workshop for Young South African Women

This is a phase 1 pilot study to assess feasibility and acceptability and potential for impact of a gender-enhanced virtual group workshop focused on oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) as an HIV prevention method for young South African women. It was developed in collaboration with South African adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 18-25. The investigators compared AGYW (N=100) assigned to the virtual group-based (GE) workshop to those assigned to an Individually Accessed (IA) condition in which women were given access to a PrEP video and to websites that provide information on PrEP and on contraception options. Investigators also evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of participant-driven recruitment (PDR). AGYW assigned to either intervention condition were invited to become Peer Health Advocates (PHAs), who were incentivized to talk to social network members and refer up to three to the intervention type the PHA attended. The aim was to assess if PDR is self-sustaining and is effective at reaching women who might not be reached in clinics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

South African adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) remain at extraordinarily high risk of HIV infection. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to alter the epidemic in this vulnerable population, given that it is has been shown that if it is adhered to, oral PrEP can protect women from HIV infection. Yet, a critical question is whether AGYW will adopt and adhere to oral PrEP.

The investigators propose that two innovations can reach young, at-risk AGYW, inform them about PrEP and motivate them to use it: (1) introducing PrEP through a gender lens in a group workshop; and (2) participant-driven recruitment-recruiting women to attend the workshop by those who have already attended it. To inform intervention development, the investigators conducted six focus groups with sexually-active AGYW (aged 18-25), 8 qualitative interviews with focus group participants, and 20 qualitative interviews with men (10 HIV-positive, 10 HIV-negative or of unknown status) partnered with women in this age range that explored knowledge of, beliefs about, motivators for, and concerns about using PrEP in the context of gendered relationship dynamics and PrEP-related stigma. Guided by gender theory and the Information Motivation Behavior (IMB) model, and in collaboration with a Working Group of AGYW, a virtual (online) group-based Gender-Enhanced (GE) Workshop (using the WhatsApp® platform) was developed. The intervention has components that are conducted by participants on their own time as well as a "real-time" "live" interactive session and aims to provide PrEP information and address AGYW's barriers to using it. The goal of the intervention is to promote consideration of and uptake of PrEP.

In this phase 1 pilot study to assess feasibility and acceptability and potential for impact of the workshop, investigators compared AGYW (N=100) assigned to the virtual group-based (GE) workshop or to an Individually Accessed (IA) condition in which women were given access to a PrEP video and to websites that provide information on PrEP and on contraception options. To evaluate participant-driven recruitment (PDR), AGYW assigned to either condition were invited to become Peer Health Advocates (PHAs), who are incentivized to talk to social network members and refer up to three to the workshop type the PHA attended. Acceptability and feasibility of PDR were evaluated by assessing whether the method can be self-sustaining (i.e., on average >50% attendees become PHAs and >2 recruits/PHAs attend a workshop); and whether it reaches high-risk women and women who would not be captured by other methods of recruitment (percent who score high on HIV risk; percent who never tested or attended family planning). If promising, these approaches will be further tested in a larger study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
        • South African Medical Research Council

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. self-reported HIV-negative or unknown status
  2. heterosexual vaginal or anal intercourse reported in the past 6 months
  3. Is not currently taking PrEP or planning to begin PrEP
  4. presently residing in eThekweni-metropolitan Durban
  5. has private smart-phone access
  6. Conversant in isiZulu or English
  7. Willing to recruit other women (if in first group of participants);
  8. (If recruited subsequent to first group): Recruited by a peer health advocate (someone the participant knew knew prior to being recruited)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Overt signs of cognitive impairment
  2. Was a participant in the previously conducted focus groups
  3. If assigned to the online group intervention, unwilling to be audio-recorded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Masibambane - Gender-Enhanced
A virtual (online) group-based interactive Gender-Enhanced (GE) Workshop (using the WhatsApp® platform). The intervention has components that are conducted by participants on their own time as well as a "real-time" "live" interactive session.
The intervention has components that provide PrEP information, provide information about HIV prevention and contraceptive options, prompt women to think about why they may be at risk for HIV, discuss women's sexual rights, and discuss how women can talk to their male partners about PrEP. The components are conducted by participants on their own time as well as during a "real-time" "live" interactive session with trained facilitators.
Other: Individually accessed
In this condition women are given access to a PrEP video and to websites that provide information on PrEP and on contraception options.
The intervention includes an individually-accessed online PrEP video and South African government websites on PrEP and on contraception options

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Who Have an Individual Counseling Session About PrEP.
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention up to 3 months after the intervention (i.e., as reported on the 3-month follow-up and nurse counselor log)
Percent of all participants who request and undergo an individual counseling session with the study nurse about the possibility of taking up PrEP. This behavioral measure will be documented by the study nurse
Immediate post-intervention up to 3 months after the intervention (i.e., as reported on the 3-month follow-up and nurse counselor log)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Who Undergo HIV-testing and Counseling (HCT).
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention up to 3 months after the intervention
Percent of all participants who undergo HIV testing and counseling, using self-administered OraQuick, either on her own or with study nurse support. This behavioral measure will be documented by the study nurse.
Immediate post-intervention up to 3 months after the intervention
Percent Taking up PrEP
Time Frame: Immediate post-intervention up to 3 months after the intervention
If participant is PrEP-eligible (HIV-negative) she initiates PrEP. This outcome will be based on self-report.
Immediate post-intervention up to 3 months after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of correct reponses on PrEP information scale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
5-item scale developed for this study. Count of correct responses
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on Perceived risk for HIV scale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
8-item measure from Napper LE, Fisher DG, Reynolds GL. Development of the perceived risk of HIV scale. AIDS and Behavior. 2012;16(4):1075-83.
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on Perceived effectiveness of PrEP scale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
10-item measure from Golub et al., Predictors of PrEP Uptake AIDS and Behavior 2019 23:1917-1924.
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on Positive outcomes of taking PrEP scale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
5-item measure from Teitelman et al., 2020 Beliefs associated with intention to use PrEP among cis-gender US women at risk: Archives of Sexual Behavior (2020) 49:2213-2221.
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on PrEP anticipated stigma, PrEP-user stereotypes subscale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
The PrEP Anticipated Stigma Scale- PrEP-User Stereotypes subscale. from Calabrese et al. HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Stigma as a Multidimensional Barrier to Uptake Among Women Who Attend Planned Parenthood J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018;79:46-53.
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on PrEP Anticipated stigma, Disapproval by others subscale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
The PrEP Anticipated Stigma Scale- Disapproval by others subscale. from Calabrese et al.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018;79:46-53
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on Medication beliefs
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
4-item scale adapted from adapted from Kalichman et al. Medication Beliefs and Structural barriers to Treatment Adherence Among People Living with HIV Infection. Psychol Health. 2016 April ; 31(4): 383-395.
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Mean value on gendered partner disclosure beliefs
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
5-item measure developed by the team for this study
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Increase in value on Stage of change scale
Time Frame: baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up
Stages of Change based on Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2002). Stages of Change. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (p. 303-313). Oxford University Press.
baseline to immediate post-intervention and 3 month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Gender-Enhanced -- Masibambane

Subscribe