Verticalization Robotic Exoskeleton DoC

August 31, 2021 updated by: Memorial Hermann Health System

Verticalization With Vestibular Stimulation for Patients With Severe Disorders of Consciousness: A Novel Application of a Robotic Exoskeleton

Mobilization, specifically verticalization, has been shown to play a role in enhancing consciousness. Vestibular stimulation has the potential to influence the neural substrate of consciousness, but this modality has not been thoroughly explored. The primary aim of this study is to compare the influence of verticalization with and without vestibular input on level of consciousness in patients experiencing disorders of consciousness (DoC).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state (UWS/VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) following traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracerebral bleeding, ischemic infarction, or hypoxic brain injury
  2. Medical clearance by a physician
  3. 18-75 years old
  4. Mobilization into standing for at least 10 minutes without signs of orthostasis

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Time since injury less than 4 weeks or more than 6 months
  2. Mobilization into standing lasts more than 30 minutes
  3. Severe osteoporosis
  4. Muscle tone that prevents joint motion (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 4)
  5. Unstable fractures
  6. Decubiti on areas contacted by robotic mobility device (i.e. heels, tibia, greater trochanter, ischial tuberosity, sacrum)
  7. Inability to fit device requirements*

    • Height 4'8"-6'4", Weight 88-222 lbs., Hip Flexion 0-90˚, Knee Flexion 0-90˚, Plantigrade

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tilt Table
A tilt table is a table with a footplate that can be tilted at different angles. The participant will lie flat on the table and straps will be placed to stabilize the trunk and lower extremities. The inclination of the tilt table will be adjusted from a horizontal to a vertical position to allow the participant to attain and maintain a standing or partial-standing position. Sessions will be supervised by a physical therapist and therapy technician.
Experimental: Robotic Mobility Device (REX)
A self supporting robotic mobility device (REX) will be utilized. It is a Class I device, and it is classified as powered exercise equipment meant for anyone that requires use of a wheelchair for mobility who has difficulty with standing and walking. The participant will be supported securely within the device using a pelvic harness, and thigh and calf cuffs. The device will be operated under the supervision of a device trained physical therapist and therapy technician. The participant will be transferred into the device in a seated position. Once aligned properly and strapped in, the participant will be passively moved by the device into standing and walking positions. To provide constant vestibular input, a variety of mobility functions will be performed including standing, sitting, walking, turning, shuffling (side-stepping), and backwards stepping.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Time Frame: through study completion; an average of 8 weeks
scores range from 0-23; higher scores mean a better outcome
through study completion; an average of 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: through study completion; an average of 8 weeks
scores range from 0-4; lower scores mean a better outcome
through study completion; an average of 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on Tilt Table

Subscribe