Bilateral Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block With or Without Bilateral Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Treatment of Obstetric Post-Dural Puncture Headache

October 15, 2022 updated by: Amr Shaaban Elshafei, Zagazig University

Bilateral Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block With or Without Bilateral Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Treatment of Obstetric Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Spinal Anesthesia

Post-dural puncture headache is a common complication, following neuraxial techniques. The obstetric population is particularly prone to PDPH. Therefore, treatment of PDPH is a key issue in obstetric anesthesia. Conservative treatment for PDPH includes adequate hydration, systemic analgesia with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and increased caffeine intake, as well as bed rest. If these measures are unsuccessful, the gold standard for the treatment of PDPH is the epidural blood patch which is an invasive technique.

The use of nerve blocks for treating headache symptoms are well known techniques that have been previously used for managing some specific types of chronic headache such as cervicogenic headache, cluster headache, migraine, and occipital neuralgia and there are some recently published studies reporting that these blocks may be beneficial in treating PDPH and the available evidence although showing improvements in the visual analogue (VAS) scores and a reduced number of patients requiring an epidural blood patch, but it is still poor.

Less invasive techniques such as SPG block and GONB are attractive therapeutic options which may eliminate the need for EBP in obstetric patients suffering from PDPH. Up to the best of our knowledge this is the first randomized trial to investigate the analgesic efficacy of adding SPG block either alone or in combination with GONB to PDPH treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a relatively common complication following dural puncture which is more frequently noted in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS) under neuraxial anesthesia. The mechanism of nociception in PDPH is still indistinct. However, it is thought to be related to the decrease in intracranial pressure caused by the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak through the dural defect leading to a downward pull of intracranial nociceptive structures which is further exacerbated by compensatory cerebral vasodilation. Managing Post-dural Puncture Headache is a challenge for most anesthesiologists as the gold standard and definitive treatment; epidural blood patch (EBP) itself can lead to inadvertent dural puncture that caused the complication in the first place. Medical and conservative management of PDPH may not provide symptomatic relief and anesthesiologists are on a constant lookout for techniques that can provide immediate and sustained relief from this debilitating complication.

The use of regional techniques and nerve blocks for the treatment of headache symptoms are well known techniques. The transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block which is an easy block that requires minimal training was shown to be helpful in the PDPH treatment with promising results. The SPG surrounded by mucous membrane within the posterior nasal turbinate, is a parasympathetic ganglion of cranial nerve (CN) VII which mediates intracranial vasodilation. The role of this block in PDPH management may be due to the vasoconstriction resulting from the parasympathetic block. Additionally, its relationship to the fifth cranial nerve (trigeminal nerve) may simultaneously relieve the frontal headache.

Another regional technique that can be used is the Greater Occipital Nerve Block (GONB) that has been previously used for managing some specific types of chronic headache such as cervicogenic headache, cluster headache, migraine, and occipital neuralgia and there are some recently published studies reporting that GONB may have a beneficial role in PDPH management. In addition, it is a superficial block which can be done at the patient's bedside under ultrasound guidance. The greater occipital nerve is the main sensory nerve of the occipital region that arises from the dorsal ramus of cervical spinal nerve II. The neuromodulation effect together with decreased central sensitivity resulting from meningial and paraspinal muscles irritation as well as blocking the spinal cord dorsal horn afferent fibers may explain the role of GONB in relieving PDPH symptoms. Moreover, the sensitive neurons of the upper cervical cord are close to the trigeminal caudal nucleus. Therefore, its afferences may also be blocked with this technique.

The available evidence of these blocks for treating PDPH although showing improvements in the visual analogue (VAS) scores and a reduced number of patients requiring an epidural blood patch, but it is still poor. Moreover, there are some clinical scenarios in which the patient may refuse treatment with the epidural blood patch, or there may be a contraindication for its use. Hence, we hypothesized those obstetric patients who are particularly prone to PDPH may get benefit from these less invasive techniques and that these blocks may be added to the treatment of patients suffering from PDPH in order to avoid the invasive EBP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sharkia
      • Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt
        • Zagazig University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient acceptance.
  • Age 21- 40 years old.
  • Post-partum females suffering PDPH with visual analogue score (VAS) ≥ 4 and modified Lybecker classification score ≥ 2
  • ASA II (due to pregnancy).
  • Body mass index < 35Kg/m2
  • Accepted mental state of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergent cesarean section.
  • Hypertensive disorders of the pregnancy.
  • History of allergy to local anesthetics.
  • History of chronic headache, migraine, convulsions, and cerebrovascular accident.
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia: coagulopathy, infection at site of injection.
  • Inadequate temporal window

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
21 patients will receive conservative management for PDPH in the form of oral paracetamol 1000 mg/8hours, and caffeine 300-500 mg/day, 1000 mL 0.9% normal saline infusion over the initial 4 hours with increasing oral fluids and bed rest to be maintained. After 6 hour of starting treatment if the above measures failed to control pain with the VAS ≥ 4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) will be added in the form of ketorolac 30 mg IV which can be repeated every 12 hours if needed. Participants will be followed up after 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours with assessment of VAS score, modified Lybecker clas¬sification score and TCD parameters. EBP will be considered after 24 hours of treatment if pain still not controlled with VAS ≥ 4 and modified Lybecker clas¬sification score ≥ 2 and after patients' consent.
Active Comparator: Interventional group

21 patients will receive the same conservative management as in control group together with bilateral transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block.

After one hour Participants who will show improvement in pain scores will be followed up after 6 hours and 24 hours, while, patients who will show persistent headache will be subjected for bilateral ultrasound guided greater occipital nerve block.

then these patients will be assessed after 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h of the block. If still suffering epidural blood patch will be indicated and performed after gaining patients' consent.

SPG block will be performed with the patient in supine position using cotton-tipped plastic hollow applicator inserted in the nose with the swab soaked in 1.5 ml 10%lignocaine. The applicator will be inserted parallel to the floor of the nose until resistance encountered. The swab will be rested in the pterygopalatine fossa superior to the middle turbinate and removed after 10 min. This procedure will be repeated in the other nostril too.
Other Names:
  • (SPG) block.
GONB will be performed with the patients lying in prone position using high frequency (6-13 MHz) probe of Siemens Acuson X300 machine placed in transverse orientation lateral to external occipital protuberance parallel to the superior nuchal line to detect occipital artery where the nerve is located medial to it 1.5inch; then 20 gauge needle will be inserted out of plane to avoid vascular injury. 4 ml of treatment solution containing 2.5 mg/ml bupivacaine and 1 mg/ml dexamethasone (prepared by adding 2 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml dexamethasone + 1 ml saline) will be injected on each side.
Other Names:
  • (GONB).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 24 hours
pain score
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trans-Carnial Doppler
Time Frame: 24 hours
to measure mean flow velocity and the Gosling pulsatility index
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sherif Mo Mowafy, MD, Assistant professor of Anesthesia & Surgical Intensive Care Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-Dural Puncture Headache

Clinical Trials on Bilateral transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block.

3
Subscribe