IPD Meta-analysis of De-escalation Treatment Strategy After PCI in ACS

June 7, 2021 updated by: Hyo-Soo Kim, Seoul National University Hospital

Comparison of De-escalation Treatment Strategy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

We will perform a systemic review of previously published data and an updated patient-level meta-analysis of studies, including the most recent publications. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the United States National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials, and relevant websites were searched for pertinent published studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPD Meta-analysis). This study population was incorporated from studies that were previoiusly published.

We will perform a systemic review of previously published data and an updated patient-level meta-analysis of studies, including the most recent publications. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the United States National Institutes of Health registry of clinical trials, and relevant websites were searched for pertinent published studies. The electronic search strategy was complemented by manual examination of references cited by included articles, recent reviews, editorials, and meta-analyses. No restrictions were imposed on language, study period, or sample size. The search keywords include "acute coronary syndrome", "ACS", "primary", "percutaneous coronary intervention", "PCI", "de-escalation", "guided", "guide", "antiplatelet", "P2Y12 inhibitor", "P2Y12", "dual antiplatelet therapy", "DAPT".

Articles were included when they met the following prespecified criteria: (1) included the ACS patients who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES); (2) maintained DAPT for 1 year; (3) de-escalation strategy of DAPT was clearly defined; (4) clinical outcomes, including ischemic and bleeding events, were clearly reported; (5) randomized controlled trials were considered for inclusion. Two independent investigators screened titles and abstracts, identified duplicated studies, performed full-article reviews, and determined the study inclusion. The third investigator supervised the searching process and adjudicated all the disagreements.

After selecting eligible RCTs, we will incorporate all known randomized controlled trials requesting individual patient data from the principal investigator of each trial.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

9000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

As above

Description

This study is a meta-analysis of previously published studies. Therefore, the eligibility criteria may be diverse according to the individual studies.

--------------------------

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must have clinical diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
De-escalation treatment group
Patients diagnosed as acute coronary syndrome, and who receive de-escalation antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Patients receive de-escalation treatment of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Conventional treatment group
Patients diagnosed as acute coronary syndrome, and who receive conventional (non-de-escalation) antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE)
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and major bleeding.
1 year after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite endpoint of Major adverse cardiovascular outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke
1 year after intervention
Major Bleeding outcome defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
Bleeding outcomes, defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
all-cause mortality
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
cardiovascular mortality
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
non-cardiovascular mortality
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
myocardial infarction
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
stroke
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
any coronary revascularization
1 year after intervention
Individual components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year after intervention
any bleeding
1 year after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kyung Woo Park, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing will be decided after discussed with the principle investigators of each study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on De-escalation Treatment Strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy

Subscribe