- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04859023
Comparison of Strategies Based on RT-PCR or Antigenic Test for the Screening of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19). (AutoCoV)
May 3, 2021 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Comparison of Strategies Based on RT-PCR or Antigenic Test for the Screening of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in General Population Using Self-samples (COVID-19).
The virological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is pivotal for the control of the outbreak by large screening of a- or pauci-symptomatic subjects.
Despite nasopharyngeal swabbing tested by RT-PCR is considered as the gold standard, new strategies based on self-samples are considered as valuable alternatives because of their non-invasiveness and ability to be performed in the absence healthcare worker, especially when the subject is asymptomatic and needs to be tested repetitively.
The aim of the present project is to evaluate two strategies both based on self-samples: (i) a saliva sample combined to an anterior nare self-swabbing tested by antigenic test versus (ii) a saliva sample tested by RT-PCR.
The comparison will be performed during a mass screening of the population of the city of Saint-Etienne (170000 inhabitants), France.
The sensitivity of the rapid antigenic test will be evaluated in comparison to that of RT-PCR considered as gold standard.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
The main objective is to evaluate the performance of a strategy for screening for CoV-2-SARS infection that would combine 1) a salivary self-sample with an anterior nasal swab and 2) a diagnostic antigenic test, in comparison with the reference salivary RT-PCR technique recently validated by National Authority for Health (HAS).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
10000
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Étienne, France
- CHU Saint-Etienne
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult age or at least 10 year old able to perform self-sampling of saliva and anterior nare swabbing
- Subject or legal tutor agreeing to participate to self-sampling and to collect anonymized data required by the present research
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to understand the protocol (language barrier notably)
- Deny to participate to the proposed research
- Patients under tutorship
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: mass screening SARS-COV-19
20 0000 participant will be included during mass screening SARS-COV-19 of the population of the city of Saint-Etienne. They will have two strategies both based on self-samples: (i) a saliva sample combined to an anterior nare self-swabbing tested by antigenic test versus (ii) a saliva sample tested by RT-PCR. |
Tested by antigenic test.
Tested by RT-PCR.
collection of : socio-professional characteristics, questions on health literacy on the transmission of the virus and barrier gestures, adherence to barrier gestures, isolation modalities in case of positivity, motivations for participating in this screening campaign.
collection of : assessment and acceptability of the tolerance of self-samples.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Positivity of self-samples combining saliva and anterior nare specimens tested by rapid antigenic test compared to saliva tested by RT-PCR (gold-standard).
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured by antigenic test results and RT-PCR results.
|
Day: 7
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number and percentage of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the selected population tested by reference RT-PCR on saliva
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured by RT-PCR results.
|
Day: 7
|
|
Number and percentage of the circulation of different variants of interest of SARS-CoV-2 viruses in the tested population
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured by RT-PCR results.
|
Day: 7
|
|
Evaluate the acceptability (pain, discomfort, speed of execution) of self-samples according to age and socio-professional categories
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured by survey of acceptability of the different self-samples results.
|
Day: 7
|
|
Evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratio of the new strategy by comparison to the gold standard (RT-PCR on saliva)
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured by number of test performed and performances of self-samples combining saliva and anterior nare specimens tested by rapid antigenic test compared to saliva tested by RT-PCR.
|
Day: 7
|
|
Number of people who have benefited from sensitization and support specifically set up as part of the screening campaign
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured the screening day.
|
Day: 7
|
|
Number of persons cared for by the territorial isolation support cell (CTAI)
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
Measured the screening day.
|
Day: 7
|
|
Health literacy questionnaire
Time Frame: Day: 7
|
It is a questionnaire with items on the transmission of the virus and barrier gestures, adherence to barrier gestures, modalities of isolation in case of positivity and motivations for participating in this screening campaign.
|
Day: 7
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bruno POZZETTO, MD PhD, CHU Saint-Etienne
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 22, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 28, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
February 28, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
April 26, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 6, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 3, 2021
Last Verified
May 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Coronavirus Infections
- Coronaviridae Infections
- Nidovirales Infections
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Respiratory Tract Infections
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Pneumonia, Viral
- Pneumonia
- Lung Diseases
- Disease Attributes
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
- COVID-19
- Infections
- Communicable Diseases
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21CH037
- 2021-A00390-41 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on SARS-CoV Infection
-
St. Olavs HospitalThe Research Council of Norway; Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF; Alesund Hospital; Namsos... and other collaboratorsCompletedSARS-CoV-2 Acute Respiratory Disease | SARS-CoV-2 Sepsis | SARS CoV 2 InfectionNorway
-
Boston UniversityNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); Kamuzu University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSARS CoV 2 Infection | SARS CoV 2 VaccinationUnited States, Malawi
-
PfizerActive, not recruitingCOVID-19 | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | COVID-19 Infection | COVID-19 Vaccines | SARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID19 | COVID-19 Vaccination | SARS-CoV-2 Infection, COVID-19 | COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) | COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 InfectionUnited States
-
University of ValladolidCompletedSARS-CoV-2 Infection (Symptomatic) | COVID-19 Pulmonary Complications | SARS-CoV-2 Positive Patients | COVID19- Infection with SARS-CoV-2 VirusSpain
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityRamathibodi Hospital; Ministry of Health, Thailand; The Government Pharmaceutical... and other collaboratorsCompletedSARS-CoV-2 Acute Respiratory Disease | SARS CoV 2 InfectionThailand
-
Sophia Koo, M.D.Massachusetts General Hospital; GlaxoSmithKline; Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteCompletedSARS CoV 2 InfectionUnited States
-
Banaras Hindu UniversityCompleted
-
The Board of MedicineApollo Neuroscience, Inc.RecruitingPost-acute Sequelae of SARS-COV-2 InfectionUnited States
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityDammam Medical Complex; Institute for Research and medical consultations (IRMC)UnknownHospitalized Patients | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV 2 Infection) | Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV 2 InfectionSaudi Arabia
-
Firalis SAIstanbul UniversityCompleted