The SUPPORT-Pro Online Platform for Healthcare Professionals Treating Individuals Living With T1D (SUPPORT-Pro)

September 22, 2025 updated by: Anne-Sophie Brazeau, McGill University

The SUPPORT-Pro Online Platform: Helping Healthcare Professionals to Increase Their Confidence Levels in Treating Individuals Living With T1D

Health care professionals (HCPs) help an support patients living with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D) who need to achieve optimal blood glucose control in order to prevent short and long term complications of T1D. However, studies show that not all HCPs are aware of T1D management as most of them only see PWT1D occasionally. This makes it difficult for HCPs to remain aware of the particularities of the condition and stay up-to-date on rapidly evolving technologies and therapies available. Moreover, low confidence levels and the inaccessibility to continuing medical education on the specificities of new therapies and technologies might increase the failure of HCPs to propose the optimal treatment plan to their PWT1D.

The SUPPORT online platform, that was first developed for PWT1D, was adjusted to suit the needs of HCPs (SUPPORT-Pro). The regularly updated bilingual (English and French) peer-reviewed content of SUPPORT, which covers the various elements that an individual with T1D needs to know to manage the disease and aims at making a better use of technologies and new therapies, is the first in its kind and is highly relevant for HCPs.

The main objective of this study is to determine if the SUPPORT-Pro online training platform can increase HCPs' (dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, medical doctors) confidence level in treating individuals with T1D. This study is a non-randomized pre-post trial. We hypothesize that the training provided through the SUPPORT-Pro online platform will significantly increase HCPs' confidence level in treating individuals with T1D after 3 months when compared to their confidence level before the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

229

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1R7
        • Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Certified Health Care Professional (nurse, physician (including resident in medicine), dietitian, pharmacist) who is member of a regulatory body in Canada
  2. Self-reported working with at least 1 patient with type 1 diabetes in the last six months
  3. Has access to the Internet
  4. Use of an active email address
  5. Comprehension of English or French

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Certified diabetes educators
  2. Working in a T1D specialized clinic
  3. Living with T1D
  4. Currently living with someone with T1D (e.g. kid, partner, etc.)
  5. Working in the pharmaceutical industry

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

All participants partaking the SUPPORT-Pro study will receive the full intervention for 3 months which implies: (1) Full access to the platform (2) a newsletter sent by email every 2 weeks to inform them on the new blogs posted on the platform.

During the following 9 months, participants will still have access to the platform, but no newsletter will be sent (sustainability phase).

Participants will have access to the SUPPORT-Pro self-guided online training platform addressing many aspects of type 1 diabetes care. The SUPPORT-Pro content was developped by a team of health professionals specialized in type 1 diabetes as well as patient partners. It's content is regularly updated, evidence-based and divided into 6 categories (medication, blood glucose monitoring, diet, physical activity, hypo and hyperglycemia, health and other particularities). In each category, users can pick between 3 levels (beginner, intermediate and advanced) according to their level of confidence and knowledge.

Participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires at baseline, 3-month, and 12-month of the intervention which include the following: Eligibility assessment, identification, background, confidence, platform satisfaction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the level of confidence in treating individuals with type 1 diabetes measured at 3 months to the level of confidence measured at baseline.
Time Frame: 3 months

Levels of confidence will be measured using a questionnaire inspired from the Maternal Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Management Scale (MSED). For this study, MSED was modified to better assess the self-confidence of health care professionals. We have converted the 17-item questionnaire to a 19-item questionnaire (removing questions specific to familial support and adding questions on new therapies and technologies) and edited the wording of the questions. Every item is rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The satisfaction score will be the sum of all items, on a maximum of 95.

Confidence levels at 3 months and at baseline will be compared using paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval, if normality assumption of the paired difference holds. Otherwise, the non-parametric counterpart, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, will be used and a 95% non-parametric confidence interval will be provided.

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare, in each specific group of HCPs (nurses, dietitians, doctors and pharmacists), the confidence levels in treating their patients with T1D after 3 months of access to the SUPPORT-Pro platform with confidence at baseline.
Time Frame: 3 months

Levels of confidence will be measured using a questionnaire inspired from the Maternal Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Management Scale (MSED). For this study, MSED was modified to better assess the self-confidence of health care professionals. We have converted the 17-item questionnaire to a 19-item questionnaire (removing questions specific to familial support and adding questions on new therapies and technologies) and edited the wording of the questions. Every item is rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The satisfaction score will be the sum of all items, on a maximum of 95.

Confidence levels at 3 months and at baseline will be compared using paired t-test with a 95% confidence interval, if normality assumption of the paired difference holds. Otherwise, the non-parametric counterpart, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, will be used and a 95% non-parametric confidence interval will be provided.

3 months
To measure the sustainability of change in all HCPs' confidence in treating patients with T1D at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months

Levels of confidence will be measured at baseline, after 3 months and after 12 months using a questionnaire inspired from the Maternal Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Management Scale (MSED). For this study, MSED was modified to better assess the self-confidence of health care professionals. We have converted the 17-item questionnaire to a 19-item questionnaire (removing questions specific to familial support and adding questions on new therapies and technologies) and edited the wording of the questions. Every item is rated on a scale from 1 to 5. The satisfaction score will be the sum of all items, on a maximum of 95.

Sustainability of change will be assessed by comparing level of confidence at the 3 time points using a one-way repeated measures ANCOVA, with change from baseline as the outcome, and baseline level of confidence adjusted for in the model.

12 months
Time spent on the platform
Time Frame: 3 months
Using back-end data collected from Google Analytics, the total time (in minutes) spent on the platform during 3 months will be presented using mean and SD (standard errors) or median and interquartile intervals, depending on its normality.
3 months
Number of posts of the discussion forum
Time Frame: 3 months
Using back-end data collected from Google Analytics, the number of posts on the discussion forum forum will be presented using mean and SD (standard errors) or median and interquartile intervals, depending on its normality.
3 months
Number of completed courses
Time Frame: 3 months
Using back-end data collected from Google Analytics, the number of completed courses will be presented using mean and SD (standard errors) or median and interquartile intervals, depending on its normality.
3 months
Number of completed categories
Time Frame: 3 months
Using back-end data collected from Google Analytics, the number completed category (maximum of 6) will be presented using mean and SD (standard errors) or median and interquartile intervals, depending on its normality.
3 months
Number of viewed videos
Time Frame: 3 months
Using back-end data collected from Google Analytics, the number of viewed videos will be presented using mean and SD (standard errors) or median and interquartile intervals, depending on its normality.
3 months
Satisfaction of the platform.
Time Frame: 3 months

After using the platform for 3 months, participants will be invited to complete a satisfaction questionnaire which includes open ended questions and a 7-items Likert scale (from 1 to 7, total score on 49).

Continuous endpoints will be presented using mean and SD (standard errors) or median and interquartile intervals, depending on their normality. Categorical variables will be presented using frequencies and percentages.

3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Sophie Brazeau, PhD, McGIll University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Educational Activities

Clinical Trials on Intervention

Subscribe