Effect of Reparel Knee Sleeve With Knee Injection

January 18, 2026 updated by: Amit Momaya, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Effects of Corticosteroid Injection Plus Reparel™ Knee Sleeve on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goals of treating knee osteoarthritis (OA) is to improve or maintain quality of life, mobility and function, pain relief, and improve inflammation. The different treatment options for knee OA have been extensively studied and implemented, but the optimum treatment is still undecided. There is a belief that anti-inflammatory sleeve technology may be beneficial in treating knee OA. The purpose of this study is to determine if the Reparel™ knee sleeve results in superior mobility, functionality, and pain outcomes as compared to a placebo knee sleeve in managing knee OA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients who are recommended non-operative management of their knee osteoarthritis and have consented to participate in the study will be randomized into two groups to receive either of the following

  1. Reparel knee sleeve
  2. Placebo knee sleeve

Participants assigned to both groups will be given instructions on how to use/wear the sleeve while performing activities of daily living or sports that had previously resulted in knee pain and also be asked to do the follows:

  • Wear the sleeve as much as they possibly can
  • Not change their usual activities and diet during the time they are on this study.
  • Record in a diary the number of hours sleeve was worn per day
  • Record any adverse effects or discomfort due to sleeve use.
  • Not to receive any injections in the subsequent 6 months following baseline randomization visit.

Participant background information that is relevant to this study will also be collected from their medical record including age, sex, and race and stored in a hospital secure computer database (REDCap).

Participants will also be asked to complete the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Lysholm Score, UCLA Activity Score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) survey questionnaires at baseline randomization visit (T0), at 4 weeks (T1), at 3 months (T2), and at 6 months (T3) to assess the mobility, functionality, and pain associated with the affected leg.

The responses to the surveys will be recorded on a password-protected laptop and all patient identifiers will be replaced with unique identifier numbers. Only the study team will have access to the responses from the forms. The analysis of de-identified data will be done through SPSS 27, and scores for the questionnaires will be averaged and compared between the two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
        • UAB Hospital Highlands

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • osteoarthritis visible on knee radiograph
  • patient opting for non-surgical treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis
  • prior surgery on the knee of interest
  • hardware present on the knee of interest
  • gross instability detected on physical exam
  • malignancy in the knee of question

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reparel Sleeve Group
Reparel sleeve and corticosteroid injection
Unlabelled thermo-active knee sleeve that improves bloodflow to knee and decreased pain
intraarticular knee injection of betamethasone and bupivacaine 0.5% (dose is determined by joint size)
Other Names:
  • betamethasone and bupivacaine 0.5%
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Sleeve Group
Placebo sleeve and corticosteroid injection
intraarticular knee injection of betamethasone and bupivacaine 0.5% (dose is determined by joint size)
Other Names:
  • betamethasone and bupivacaine 0.5%
unlabeled compression knee sleeve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
activity score, 1-10, 10 is best outcome
4 weeks (T1)
Change in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
activity score, 1-10, 10 is best outcome
3 months (T2)
Change in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
activity score, 1-10, 10 is best outcome
6 months (T3)
Change in Lysholm Score at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
ability to manage activities of daily living, 0-100, 100 is best outcome
4 weeks (T1)
Change in Lysholm Score at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
ability to manage activities of daily living, 0-100, 100 is best outcome
3 months (T2)
Change in Lysholm Score at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
ability to manage activities of daily living, 0-100, 100 is best outcome
6 months (T3)
Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
knee pain and function score, 0-48, 48 is best outcome
4 weeks (T1)
Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
knee pain and function score, 0-48, 48 is best outcome
3 months (T2)
Change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
knee pain and function score, 0-48, 48 is best outcome
6 months (T3)
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
knee pain and function score, 0-100, 100 is best outcome
4 weeks (T1)
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
knee pain and function score, 0-100, 100 is best outcome
3 months (T2)
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
knee pain and function score, 0-100, 100 is best outcome
6 months (T3)
Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
function score, 0-100%, 100% is best outcome
4 weeks (T1)
Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
function score, 0-100%, 100% is best outcome
3 months (T2)
Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
function score, 0-100%, 100% is best outcome
6 months (T3)
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
pain score, 0-10, 10 is best outcome
4 weeks (T1)
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
pain score, 0-10, 10 is best outcome
3 months (T2)
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
pain score, 0-10, 10 is best outcome
6 months (T3)
Need for Additional CSI
Time Frame: 6 months
need for additional CSI after baseline injection
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with knee sleeve at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
0-10, 10 is best
4 weeks (T1)
Satisfaction with knee sleeve at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
0-10, 10 is best
3 months (T2)
Satisfaction with knee sleeve at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
0-10, 10 is best
6 months (T3)
Average wear time of sleeve over past week at 4 weeks
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T1)
0-24 hours, 24 hours is best
4 weeks (T1)
Average wear time of sleeve over past week at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months (T2)
0-24 hours, 24 hours is best
3 months (T2)
Average wear time of sleeve over past week at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months (T3)
0-24 hours, 24 hours is best
6 months (T3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amit Momaya, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Reparel knee sleeve

Subscribe