Dialogical Family Guidance for Neurodevelopmental Disorders (DFG)

May 18, 2021 updated by: Diana Cavonius-Rintahaka

Dialogical Family Guidance in Families With a Child With Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Previous studies have highlighted the need to offer targeted effective interventions to strengthen the wellbeing of all family members in families with children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). Interventions for this target group requires development and research. A new family intervention, Dialogical Family Guidance (DFG) was tested in this study. All families received DFG intervention ( 6 meetings ).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Previous studies have highlighted the need to offer targeted effective interventions to strengthen the wellbeing of all family members in families with children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). Interventions for this target group requires development and research. A new family intervention, Dialogical Family Guidance (DFG) was tested in this study.

Fifty families of children with NDD were randomized into two intervention groups. Intervention group I were delivered DFG immediately, and Intervention group II were delivered DFG after three months. Family functionality, health and support (FAFHES), SDQ and the 5-15-questionnaire and DFG parent questionnaires were used to collect data at baseline, after three and six months. Fifty families were invited to the study. Thirty-four families completed the study. A comparison were made between Intervention group I and II.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical neurodevelopmental disorder diagnosis (eg ADHD, ASD, tics, language disorders)
  • the child is aged between 4-16 years
  • parent have adequate Finnish language skills
  • parents are biological parents or step-parents of the child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the child is under 4 or over 16 years old
  • parents do not have adequate Finnish language skills

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group I
6 sessions of intervention DFG starting at once (baseline). After DFG treatment as usual at Helsinki University hospital. The change between before the intervention (baseline) and after the intervention (3 months later) is being assessed.
Experimental: Intervention group II
6 sessions of intervention DFG starting 3 months after baseline (3 months on waiting list). Between baseline and 3 months waiting list families were getting treatment as usual at Helsinki University hospital. The change between baseline - after 3 months waiting list (3 months from baseline)/ before the intervention - and after intervention (6 months from baseline) is being assessed. Also the difference between Intervention group I and II is assessed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Family Function, Health and Social Support - scale (FAFHES)
Time Frame: Baseline measure before DFG family intervention starts
The FAFHES questionnaire contains three sections; family functionality (19 items), family health (23 items), and family support provided by professionals (21 items). All the items are measured on a Likert scale ranging from 1-6 (I disagree totally, I disagree, I disagree somewhat, I agree somewhat, I agree, I agree totally). Family functionality, family health and family support were seen as poor if the median was 1.00-2.7, moderate if it was 2.8-4.5, and good if it was 4.6-6.0.45. Parent questionnaire. 1=I totally disagree.....6=I absolutely agree. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Baseline measure before DFG family intervention starts
The Family Function, Health and Social Support Scale (FAFHES)
Time Frame: 3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished. Change is being assessed.
The FAFHES questionnaire contains three sections; family functionality (19 items), family health (23 items), and family support provided by professionals (21 items). All the items are measured on a Likert scale ranging from 1-6 (I disagree totally, I disagree, I disagree somewhat, I agree somewhat, I agree, I agree totally). Family functionality, family health and family support were seen as poor if the median was 1.00-2.7, moderate if it was 2.8-4.5, and good if it was 4.6-6.0.45. Parent questionnaire. 1=I totally disagree.....6=I absolutely agree. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished. Change is being assessed.
The Family Function, Health and Social Support Scale (FAFHES)
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline follow up. Change is being assessed.
The FAFHES questionnaire contains three sections; family functionality (19 items), family health (23 items), and family support provided by professionals (21 items). All the items are measured on a Likert scale ranging from 1-6 (I disagree totally, I disagree, I disagree somewhat, I agree somewhat, I agree, I agree totally). Family functionality, family health and family support were seen as poor if the median was 1.00-2.7, moderate if it was 2.8-4.5, and good if it was 4.6-6.0.45. Parent questionnaire. 1=I totally disagree.....6=I absolutely agree. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
6 months after baseline follow up. Change is being assessed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Dialogical Family Guidance (DFG) - questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished.
The DFG-questionnaire was developed for this study to obtain information and parents' experiences about the DFG family intervention. The questionnaire include 14 items. Questions about the content and recommendation of DFG sessions were for example: "Did you get practical tips for daily life?" (1= yes absolutely….5=not at all) and "Would you recommend DFG to other parents?" (1=yes absolutely….4=no). The following semi-structured open-ended question was included in the DFG-questionnaire: Could you describe your experiences, comments or/and ideas about how to improve DFG? Parents filled the questionnaire after completing the DFG process (six meetings). Most questions were opinions about DFG, but when questions about "Did you get help from DFG?" 1=very much.... 5=not at all
3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: Baseline measure before DFG family intervention starts
SDQ measures the changes in child's behavior. 25 items with 3-point likert scale; Not true (0)- Somewhat true (1) - Certainly true (2). Parent questionnaire. Higher scores mean worse outcome considering the child with neurodevelopmental disorder.Highest scores 50 - lowest 0. Total score16-40 = high risk for abnormalities.
Baseline measure before DFG family intervention starts
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: 3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished. Change is being assessed.
SDQ measures the changes in child's behavior. 25 items with 3-point likert scale; Not true (0)- Somewhat true (1) - Certainly true (2). Parent questionnaire. Higher scores mean worse outcome considering the child with neurodevelopmental disorder.Highest scores 50 - lowest 0. Total score16-40 = high risk for abnormalities.
3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished. Change is being assessed.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline follow up. Change is being assessed.
SDQ measures the changes in child's behavior. 25 items with 3-point likert scale; Not true (0)- Somewhat true (1) - Certainly true (2). Parent questionnaire. Higher scores mean worse outcome considering the child with neurodevelopmental disorder.Highest scores 50 - lowest 0. Total score16-40 = high risk for abnormalities.
6 months after baseline follow up. Change is being assessed.
Parent Questionnaire for Evaluation of Development and Behaviour in 5-15-year old Children, 5-15 (FTF, Five - to - Fifteen)
Time Frame: Baseline measure before DFG family intervention starts
Parent Questionnaire for evaluation of development and behaviour in 5-15-year old children. 181 items. Three point likert scale; Not true (0) - Somewhat true (1)- Certainly true (2). Higher scores mean worse outcome considering the child. 0-13 scores normal and 17-40 scores mean abnormal result/abnormal
Baseline measure before DFG family intervention starts
Parent Questionnaire for Evaluation of Development and Behaviour in 5-15-year old Children, 5-15 (FTF, Five - to - Fifteen)
Time Frame: 3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished. Change is being assessed.
Parent Questionnaire for evaluation of development and behaviour in 5-15-year old children. 181 items. Three point likert scale; Not true (0) - Somewhat true (1)- Certainly true (2). Higher scores mean worse outcome considering the child. 0-13 scores normal and 17-40 scores mean abnormal result/abnormal
3 months after baseline measure, when intervention is finished. Change is being assessed.
Parent Questionnaire for Evaluation of Development and Behaviour in 5-15-year old Children, 5-15 (FTF, Five - to - Fifteen)
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline follow up. Change is being assessed.
Parent Questionnaire for evaluation of development and behaviour in 5-15-year old children. 181 items. Three point likert scale; Not true (0) - Somewhat true (1)- Certainly true (2). Higher scores mean worse outcome considering the child. 0-13 scores normal and 17-40 scores mean abnormal result/abnormal
6 months after baseline follow up. Change is being assessed.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Diana Cavonius-Rintahaka, MhSc, Tampere University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 106/13/03/03/2012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Family Dynamics

Clinical Trials on DFG

Subscribe