Vagal Response and Cardiac Autonomic Modulation. Insides From Cryoballoon Ablation

May 20, 2021 updated by: Radoslaw Kiedrowicz, Pomeranian Medical University Szczecin

Does Vagal Response Indicate Cardiac Autonomic Modulation and Improve the Therapeutic Effect of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation? Insides From Cryoballoon Ablation

The investigators sought to evaluate the incidence and influence of vagal response observed during cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation on the cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) and ablation outcomes in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation cohort. 296 patients were treated with a 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic). Preprocedural pulmonary veins anatomy and their ostial dimensions were acquired with a computed tomography. 74 patients without structural heart disease and with no concomitant diseases were chosen for a detailed CANS assessment with heart rate variability analysis. All patients were screened over a 2-year post-ablation period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An interplay between left atrial (LA) ganglionated plexi (GP), a part of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS), and pulmonary veins (PVs) is considered to be an important mechanism related with the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore additional GP ablation has been reported with better ablation outcomes when added to RF-based PV isolation (PVI). A cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an anatomically based approach which allows PVI that is highly safe and efficacious. The extension of the scar created by the cryoballoon frequently extends beyond the PV orifice in the acute and chronic post-ablation phase creating a set of lesions that are near the LA-GP area and inadvertent damage. A marked vagal response (VR) observed during CBA is considered a marker for the CANS modification. However, changes in the autonomic tone were independently noted from the presence of VR in several studies. Moreover, it is not clear if these changes are transient or long-lasting, and it has been shown that the presence of VR increases ablation success although with conflicting results. In previous studies assessing the influence of CBA on the autonomic balance, CANS modulation was appraised with different surrogates, a small number of individuals were usually recruited and both paroxysmal and persistent AF populations were included. Therefore, the investigators sought to evaluate the incidence of VR observed during CBA-based PVI, its impact on CANS assessed with widely accepted heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, and in relation to ablation outcomes in a large paroxysmal AF (PAF) cohort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

296

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous atrial fibrillation ablation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation cohort
Patients treated with a 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and screened over a 2-year post-ablation period.
A cryoballoon is introduced to the LA via a steerable sheath following a single transseptal puncture. The balloon is advanced toward the PV ostium and inflated. PV occlusion is documented by the injection of contrast. Optimal vessel occlusion is assumed when the PV showes complete contrast retention without any backflow to the atrium. The freezing time is chosen between 180 and 240s and left at the operator's discretion, along with a decision if to follow with a bonus-freeze cycle. The application is aborted and the cryoballoon is repositioned in the case of ineffective cooling or when the nadir temperature decreases < -60°C, to avoid excessive cooling. In cases where a real-time recording of PV potentials is available a short time-to-isolation<60s resultes in a single 180s freeze cycle. CBA always startes from the left upper PV (LUPV) followed by the left lower PV (LLPV).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of patients free from atrial fibrillation following a cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation beyond a 3-month blanking period.
Time Frame: 3 months
Outpatient visit was scheduled at 3 months following ablation. A detailed medical history was taken with emphasis on registered atrial fibrillation episodes or atrial fibrillation suggestive symptoms. 24 hour Holter monitoring was performed in all patients.
3 months
The number of patients free from atrial fibrillation following a cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation beyond a 3-month blanking period.
Time Frame: 6 months
Outpatient visit was scheduled at 6 months following ablation. A detailed medical history was taken with emphasis on registered atrial fibrillation episodes or atrial fibrillation suggestive symptoms. 24 hour Holter monitoring was performed in all patients.
6 months
The number of patients free from atrial fibrillation following a cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation beyond a 3-month blanking period.
Time Frame: 12 months
Outpatient visit was scheduled at 12 months following ablation. A detailed medical history was taken with emphasis on registered atrial fibrillation episodes or atrial fibrillation suggestive symptoms. 24 hour Holter monitoring was performed in all patients.
12 months
The number of patients free from atrial fibrillation following a cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation beyond a 3-month blanking period.
Time Frame: 18 months
Outpatient visit was scheduled at 18 months following ablation. A detailed medical history was taken with emphasis on registered atrial fibrillation episodes or atrial fibrillation suggestive symptoms. 24 hour Holter monitoring was performed in all patients.
18 months
The number of patients free from atrial fibrillation following a cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation beyond a 3-month blanking period.
Time Frame: 24 months
Outpatient visit was scheduled at 24 months following ablation. A detailed medical history was taken with emphasis on registered atrial fibrillation episodes or atrial fibrillation suggestive symptoms. 24 hour Holter monitoring was performed in all patients.
24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of vagal response observed during cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation
Time Frame: At the time of procedure
Vagal reaction was defined as sinus bradycardia <40 bpm, sinus arrest, atrioventricular block or hypotension registered anytime from the beginning of cryoapplication up to 1 minute following balloon deflation preceded by a thawing period.
At the time of procedure
The impact on of vagal response on intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system with widely accepted heart rate variability (HRV) analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
A 24h holter ECG was acquired on the day before ablation and 3 months thereafter. Holter electrocardiograms were recorded by a DMS 300-3A (DM Software Inc., USA). A HRV was analysed by a Cardioscan II system (DM Software). Artifacts, premature complexes, and atrial runs were excluded from calculation. Records with abnormal beats, rhythms and noise that constituted >5% of all beats were repeated. HRV parameters included mean heart rate (mHR), five time-domain variables:(1) SDNN, (2) SDNN index, (3) SDANN, (4) rMSSD, (5) pNN50, and three frequency domain variables: (1) LF, (2) HF, and (3) LF/HF ratio
3 months
The impact on of vagal response on intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system with widely accepted heart rate variability (HRV) analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
A 24h holter ECG was acquired on the day before ablation and 6 months thereafter. Holter electrocardiograms were recorded by a DMS 300-3A (DM Software Inc., USA). A HRV was analysed by a Cardioscan II system (DM Software). Artifacts, premature complexes, and atrial runs were excluded from calculation. Records with abnormal beats, rhythms and noise that constituted >5% of all beats were repeated. HRV parameters included mean heart rate (mHR), five time-domain variables:(1) SDNN, (2) SDNN index, (3) SDANN, (4) rMSSD, (5) pNN50, and three frequency domain variables: (1) LF, (2) HF, and (3) LF/HF ratio
6 months
The impact on of vagal response on intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system with widely accepted heart rate variability (HRV) analysis
Time Frame: 12 months
A 24h holter ECG was acquired on the day before ablation and 12 months thereafter. Holter electrocardiograms were recorded by a DMS 300-3A (DM Software Inc., USA). A HRV was analysed by a Cardioscan II system (DM Software). Artifacts, premature complexes, and atrial runs were excluded from calculation. Records with abnormal beats, rhythms and noise that constituted >5% of all beats were repeated. HRV parameters included mean heart rate (mHR), five time-domain variables:(1) SDNN, (2) SDNN index, (3) SDANN, (4) rMSSD, (5) pNN50, and three frequency domain variables: (1) LF, (2) HF, and (3) LF/HF ratio
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Radoslaw M Kiedrowicz, PhD, Pomeranian Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autonomic Nervous System

Clinical Trials on cryoballoon-based pulmonary veins isolation

3
Subscribe