Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Steep Trendelenburg Position (optiPEEP)

January 25, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Antwerp

The investigators hypothesize that the level of PEEP is often suboptimally applied in certain operative conditions, such as in laparoscopy with head down (Trendelenburg) positioning. This can result in excessive levels of lung stress and postoperative pulmonary complications.

In patients with steep Trendelenburg and a pneumoperitoneum, the investigators aim to

  1. measure apical versus basal atelectasis using the lung ultrasound score
  2. compare lung ultrasound scores at different PEEP levels
  3. compare respiratory mechanics at the different PEEP levels
  4. contrast the optimal PEEP level to standard practice
  5. provide guidance to optimal PEEP titration in this setting for the clinician

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators hypothesize that the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is often incorrectly applied in certain operative conditions, such as in laparoscopy with head down (Trendelenburg) positioning. This can result in excessive levels of lung stress and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Incorrect intra-operative ventilator management can be harmful for the patient, potentially leading to postoperative pulmonary complications and ventilator-induced lung injury. During routine anesthesia procedures, most anesthetists will set the ventilator by rule of thumb with a PEEP of 4-6 cmH2O, a tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of ideal body weight and a frequency of 10-15 breaths per minute in order to provide lung protective ventilation. However, due to recent advances in surgical practice, patients are more frequently placed in non- physiological states, such as Trendelenburg position up to 30° with concurrent pneumoperitoneum and intra-abdominal pressures of 15mmHg or higher, as in for example robot-assisted radical prostatectomy or gynecological procedures. This extreme positioning and increased intra-abdominal pressure can have a significant effect on respiratory mechanics and can potentially result in excessive lung stress. The changes in applied positive pressure ventilation will result in changes of regional ventilation: both an increased amount of atelectasis and an increased amount of regional hyperinflation are observed in this setting. The ideal PEEP level balances the recruitment of atelectasis versus excessive hyperinflation. These changes in regional ventilation can be assessed by lung ultrasound. The lung ultrasound score can distinguish atelectasis from normal aeration in the different lung regions of interest.

This project is designed as a single center cohort study. Non-obese (BMI < 30kg/m2), lung-healthy non-pregnant, non-smoking individuals without right sided heart failure, scheduled for elective laparoscopy of the lower abdomen, will be recruited. Standardized induction and maintenance with propofol TCI (3-6μg/l plasma concentration as calculated by the Marsh model), sufentanil (0.2μg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6mg/kg) will be provided. Neuromuscular blockade will be monitored using a train-of-four (TOF) monitor and kept with a TOF count < 1 throughout the study using additional doses if indicated. A radial arterial line will be placed. Mechanical ventilation will be provided in volume control mode with a tidal volume of 4-6 ml/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) aiming for a driving pressure ≤ 15cmH2O, a starting PEEP of 5cmH2O, a frequency of 12-18 breaths per minute titrated to the end-tidal CO2 measurement and an initial FiO2 of 0.4. An esophageal balloon catheter with pressure sensor will be used to calculate transpulmonary pressures. The balloon and pressure sensor will be calibrated as per manufacturers guideline. Respiratory parameters will be recorded and saved for later evaluation using the FluxMed GrT monitor and software (MBMED, Argentina). After inflation of the pneumoperitoneum, lung ultrasound will be performed bilaterally at the midclavicular line between the second and third ribs, at the posterior axillary line above the level of T4 and at the posterior axillary line closely superior to the diaphragm, thus retaining 6 ultrasound loops which will be saved for post-hoc lung ultrasound scoring. The lung ultrasound measurements will be repeated at different decremental levels of PEEP: 15, 10, 5 and 0 cmH2O respectively. Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed before insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum and repeated at each level of PEEP. A minimum of 4 minutes equilibration time will be provided after changing PEEP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • Antwerp University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg (head-down) position

Exclusion Criteria:

  • smoker
  • lung disease (e.g. asthma, COPD, emphysema)
  • BMI > 30 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decremental PEEP
Every participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP.
High PEEP to low PEEP.
lung ultrasound to determine the extend of atelectasis. Uses validated lung ultrasound score.
Blood gas analysis to determine arterial oxygen tension
Pressures and volumes will be registered by the Fluxmed respiratory monitor (MBMED, Argentina)
Dead space will be measured non-invasively using volumetric capnography on the FluxMed respiratory monitor (MBMED, Argentina)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung ultrasound score
Time Frame: Perioperatively

Lung ultrasound score per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). The score is dimensionless. A cumulative count is calculated for each level of PEEP by adding the scores from the 6 scanned lung regions together.

The lung ultrasound score is a measure of atelectasis.

Perioperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transpulmonary pressure (cmH2O)
Time Frame: Perioperatively

Transpulmonary pressure per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). Transpulmonary pressure is calculated as plateau airway pressure minus esophageal pressure (at the same timepoint).

Plateau airway pressures (cmH2O) are measured at the ventilator during an inspiratory pause.

Esophageal pressures (cmH2O) are measured with an esophageal balloon and pressure transducer.

Esophageal pressures are proven to correlate closely to pleural pressures. The Fluxmed device (MBMED, Argentina) is used to capture pressures and volumes at the ventilator.

Perioperatively
Driving pressure (cmH2O)
Time Frame: Perioperatively

Driving pressures per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). Driving pressure (cmH2O) is calculated as plateau airway pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

Plateau airway pressures (cmH2O) are measured at the ventilator during an inspiratory pause.

PEEP (cmH2O) is measured at the ventilator at end-expiration. The Fluxmed device (MBMED, Argentina) is used to capture pressures and volumes at the ventilator.

Perioperatively
Dynamic pulmonary compliance (ml/cmH2O)
Time Frame: Perioperatively

Dynamic pulmonary compliance per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). The dynamic pulmonary compliance is calculated as tidal volume divided by the driving pressure.

Tidal volumes (ml) are measured at the ventilator. Driving pressures are calculated as mentioned in the description of outcome 3. The Fluxmed device (MBMED, Argentina) is used to capture pressures and volumes at the ventilator.

Perioperatively
P/F ratio (Horowitz index, mmHg / %)
Time Frame: Perioperatively

Ratio of the arterial oxygen tension (mmHg) divided by the fraction of inspired oxygen (%) per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O).

The arterial oxygen tension is measured at a point-of-care blood gas analyzer (Roche Cobas, Basel, Swiss) The inspiratory oxygen fraction (%) is measured at the ventilator.

Perioperatively
Dead space
Time Frame: Perioperatively
Median dead space per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O).
Perioperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vera Saldien, MD, PhD, Head of the department of anesthesiology
  • Study Chair: Tom Schepens, MD, PhD, Anesthetist/intensivist
  • Study Chair: Gregory De Meyer, MD, Anesthetist in training
  • Study Director: Stuart G Morrison, MD, Staff anesthetist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20/40/516 (Other Identifier: IRB)
  • 1378 (Other Identifier: EDGE)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atelectasis

Clinical Trials on Decremental PEEP

Subscribe