- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05851612
Comparison of Three Methods of PEEP Titration During One Lung Ventilation in Prone Position
Comparison of PEEP Titration Guided by Driving Pressure Versus Oxygenation Method Versus Constant PEEP in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy With One Lung Ventilation in Prone Position
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Induction of general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation impair respiratory function because of alveoli collapse, decreased functional residual capacity, diminished arterial oxygenation, and even mechanical ventilation-induced injury.In addition, One-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery is prone to ventilator induced lung injury and oxygen toxicity. It is also associated with a profound inflammatory cytokine release which causes excessive neutrophils recruitment that increases pulmonary vascular permeability in both lungs. These reactions often precede systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumonia. Therefore, lung protection and protective ventilation is strongly recommended during thoracic surgery.In contrast to the lateral decubitus position, OLV in the prone position is devoid of the beneficial effect of gravity on preferential redistribution of the pulmonary blood flow to the dependent areas of a lung, possibly resulting in increased V/Q mismatch. Also, the prone position is frequently associated with decreased respiratory compliance and increased peak airway pressure in anesthetized and paralyzed patients when not assuring free abdominal and chest movements, which is further aggravated by CO2 insufflation. Prone positioning during esophagectomy provides several advantages, including shortened operative times and superior surgical view, at the cost of one-lung ventilation (OLV). Intraoperative lung protective ventilation strategy, which includes the combination of low tidal volume and adequate PEEP levels during operation, has been reported to improve respiratory mechanics and reduce the incidence and severity of atelectasis which may prolong hospital stays and increase mortality in surgical patients.Improper PEEP levels have an impact on patient physiology. If the setting level is too low to achieve the desired purpose, it cannot produce the effect of applying PEEP. If the setting level is too high, the pulmonary vascular resistance increases, venous return blood volume decreases, intrapulmonary shunt increases, and arterial oxygen partial pressure level is reduced. Also, it could negatively affect cardiac output and delivery of oxygen to vital organs.Individualization the optimal PEEP level according to the respira¬tory condition of patients has gradually attracted the attention of clinicians. The methods to determine the best PEEP levels include computed tomography scanning, electri¬cal impedance tomography, ultrasound, P-V curve method, best oxygenation titration method, and best lung compliance titration method. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages. Individualized PEEP has advantages over fixed PEEP in improved respiratory mechanics and prevent progressive alveolar collapse.There are few studies on the selection of appropriate PEEP values during one-lung ven¬tilation (OLV) in prone position and the protective effect of PEEP values can be titrated by different titration methods which still requires many prospective studies. Therefore, this study will be conducted to compare PEEP titration using driving pressure versus oxygenation method versus constant PEEP and evaluate their efficacy on oxygenation, ventilation, hemodynamics and PPC for patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy treated with one lung ventilation in prone position.
Aim of the Study:
The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the differences between three different PEEP values in patients who will undergo thoracoscopic esophagectomy treated with one lung ventilation in prone position receiving either constant PEEP or driving pressure guided individualized PEEP or oxygenation guided individualized PEEP.
It is hypothesized that the individualized PEEP guided by driving pressure could improve intraoperative oxygenation function, pulmonary mechanics, early postoperative atelectasis, and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications(PPCs) for patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy treated with one lung ventilation in prone position.
Sample Size Calculation:
A pilot study was performed to measure the lung ultrasound score at the end of the surgery to estimate the sample size. Sample size calculations were performed using G. power software (version 3.1.9.7). The means and standard deviations for the D group, O group, and C group were 10.5 + 2.02, 11.7 + 1.2, and 12.5 + 2.5, respectively. Sample size calculations showed that 11 subjects per group will be required to achieve 95% power with a Type I error of 0.05. A total of 42 patients (14 patients per group) will be included in this trial considering an 80% adherence rate.
Methods:
The study will include 42 patients who will be scheduled for thoracoscopic esophagectomy treated with one lung ventilation in prone position under general anesthesia. It will be conducted in Mansoura gastroenterology center over one year and patients will be recruited in june 2023. they will be randomly assigned to 3 equal groups (D group, O group and C group) according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes which will be opened only after obtaining the written informed consent.A single investigator will assess the patients for eligibility, obtain written informed consent, open the sealed opaque envelopes containing group allocation and set up the ventilator as specified in the envelope. The study subjects and the resident assessing the outcome will be blinded to the study group.The study protocol will be explained to all patients after enrollment into the study. They will be kept fasting according to pre-operative ASA recommendations prior to surgery. Basic demographic characters including age, sex, and BMI will be recorded. The peri-operative management will be identical in the three groups.
Statistical analysis:- The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program (version 22) for Windows. Normality of numerical data distribution will be tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed numerical data will be presented as mean and standard deviation, and their comparison in different groups will be performed using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test. Non-normally distributed numerical data will be presented as median and range, and compared nonparametrically using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data will be presented as number and percentage, and their comparison will be performed using Chi-square test. The all data will be considered significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Amany H EL-Deeb, MD
- Phone Number: 01008479726
- Email: amanyhazem91@mans.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amany EL-Deeb, MD
- Email: tamaraomar89@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mansoura, Egypt, 35511
- Recruiting
- Mansoura University
-
Contact:
- amany EL-deeb, MD
- Phone Number: 01008479726
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) (grade 1or 2) patients.
- Scheduled for elective thoracoscopic esophagectomy treated with one lung ventilation in prone position and surgery of expected duration greater than 1 h.
- Body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient's refusal.
- Altered mental status or un-cooperative patients.
- History of known sensitivity to the used anesthetics.
- Significant cardiac dysfunction, hepatic, or renal impairment.
- History of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- History of severe or uncontrolled bronchial asthma.
- History of severe restrictive lung disease.
- History of pulmonary metastases.
- History of any thoracic surgery.
- Need for chest drainage prior to surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: group C(constant group)
Constant PEEP of 5 centimeter of water (cm H2O) will be applied
|
Constant PEEP of 5 cm H2O will be applied and maintained throughout one-lung ventilation.
|
Active Comparator: group D (driving group)
PEEP titration will be according to driving pressure
|
PEEP titration will be started at 5 cmH2O and then increased in 1 cmH2O interval to 10 cmH2O.
After 10 breath cycles will maintained, Driving pressure (ΔP) will be measured at each PEEP level at the last cycle.
The PEEP indicating the lowest ΔP will be selected if multiple levels of PEEP showed the same lowest ΔP, the lowest PEEP will be selected.
Driving pressure will be calculated as plateau pressure minus PEEP.
Titration will stopped if peak inspiratory pressure of 50 cm H2O, or plateau pressure of 40 cm H2O reached, or hypotension will be observed.
|
Active Comparator: group O (oxygenation group)
PEEP titration will be according to oxygenation method
|
PEEP titration will be started from 5 cmH2O and increase of 1 cmH2O every 4 min with fixed driving pressure that will result in delivery of a fixed tidal volume (TV) of 6ml/kg ideal body weight (IBW).
Optimal PEEP will be defined as the PEEP below which PaO2 /FIO2 falls by at least 20%.
If at least 20% PaO2 /FIO2 decrement is not obtained, then PEEP that will result in the highest PaO2 will be selected.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
lung ultrasound score
Time Frame: Up to 5 min before leaving the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)
|
Thorax will be divided into 12 segments.
The lung ultrasound score is 0 to 3, based on the B-line count and the degree of subpleural solidity.
A total score of 0-36 will be obtained by summing the scores of the 12 segments.
The absolute difference in the three lung ultrasound scores measured before induction, before neuromuscular block reversal, at the end of surgery/before extubation, and 5 min before leaving the PACU respectively.
|
Up to 5 min before leaving the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
The ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to the fraction of inspiratory oxygen concentration (PaO2/FiO2 ratio)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be recorded before the procedure, after 15 min, 30 minutes and then every 30min intraoperative till the end of surgery.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
The Central venous pressure (CVP) values
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be recorded before the procedure, after 15 min, 30 minutes and then every 30min intraoperative till the end of surgery.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
The total volume of fluids and vasopressors administered
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
They will be recorded at the end of surgery
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
The duration of operation, anesthesia and one lung ventilation .
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
will be recorded at the end of surgery
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Occurrence of Intra-operative adverse effects
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
Any adverse events occur intraoperative as hypotension or bradycardia will be recorded.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Plateau pressure
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Driving pressure
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Tidal volume
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Static compliance
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Peak pressure
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
End-tidal carbon dioxide
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
The alveolar-arterial gradient (A-a gradient)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at 10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
the potential of hydrogen (pH)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
The partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood(PaCO2)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
the partial pressure of oxygen n arterial blood(PaO2)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Actual base excess
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Bicarbonate (HCO3)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Lactate
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be collected at before induction ,10 minutes after induction, Prone position, 10 minutes after titration and every hour until the end of OLV, before neuromuscular block reversal and at the end of surgery/before extubation.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)
Time Frame: Up to the end of the procedure
|
It will be recorded before the procedure, after 15 min, 30 minutes and then every 30min intraoperative till the end of surgery.
|
Up to the end of the procedure
|
Occurrence of post-operative complications.
Time Frame: up to one week after the procedure
|
the occurrence of PPC (cough, increased sputum, dyspnea, chest pain, temperature above 38 °C, HR > 100 beats/min) will be recorded.
|
up to one week after the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amany EL-Deeb, MD, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Choi YS, Shim JK, Na S, Hong SB, Hong YW, Oh YJ. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2286-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0310-5. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
- Wang ZY, Ye SS, Fan Y, Shi CY, Wu HF, Miao CH, Zhou D. Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure with and without recruitment maneuvers in obese patients during bariatric surgery. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2022 Sep;38(9):858-868. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12576. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
- Park M, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, Yang M, Heo BY, Choi JW, Kim YR, Lee SH, Jeong H, Choi SJ, Song IS. Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019 Mar;130(3):385-393. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002600.
- Yao W, Yang B, Wang W, Han Q, Liu F, Shan S, Wang C, Zheng M. Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Titration in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lobectomy. Med Sci Monit. 2022 Dec 13;28:e938225. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938225.
- Liu K, Huang C, Xu M, Wu J, Frerichs I, Moeller K, Zhao Z. PEEP guided by electrical impedance tomography during one-lung ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):757. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.95.
- Monastesse A, Girard F, Massicotte N, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Girard M. Lung Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis: A Pilot Feasibility Study. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):494-504. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001603.
- Xu Q, Guo X, Liu J, Li SX, Ma HR, Wang FX, Lin JY. Effects of dynamic individualized PEEP guided by driving pressure in laparoscopic surgery on postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01613-9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- PEEP in OLV in prone position
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on One Lung Ventilation
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianCompletedOne-Lung VentilationUnited Kingdom
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedOne Lung VentilationKorea, Republic of
-
Radboud University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Sichuan UniversityWest China HospitalTemporarily not availableOne Lung Ventilation
-
Joseph D. TobiasCompletedOne-lung Ventilation (OLV)United States
-
Technische Universität DresdenIstanbul University; European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareActive, not recruitingOne-Lung VentilationNetherlands, Turkey, Brazil, Greece, Austria, Italy, Taiwan, Egypt, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, Serbia, China, Croatia, Germany, Chile, Switzerland, United States, Slovenia, Albania, Cyprus, Czechia, France, Hungary, Iraq, Latvia, Mexico, R... and more
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedOne-lung VentilationKorea, Republic of
-
Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgCompletedOne-Lung Ventilation | Lung Separation Techniques
Clinical Trials on constant PEEP
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUnknownPulmonary Ventilation; Newborn, AbnormalGermany
-
Gachon University Gil Medical CenterCompletedThe Effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (lapaPEEP)Brain IschemiaKorea, Republic of
-
University of BathSociété des Produits Nestlé (SPN)CompletedCircadian Rhythms | Feeding PatternsUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, AngersNot yet recruiting
-
University of TriesteCompletedThoracic Surgery | One-lung Ventilation | Respiratory Mechanics | Artificial RespirationItaly
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Maastricht University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc; St. Antonius... and other collaboratorsCompletedVentilator-free DaysNetherlands
-
Hongpeng LiCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Mechanical Ventilation Complication
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamAmerican Heart AssociationCompletedBlood Pressure | Circadian RhythmUnited States
-
Osaka UniversityUnknownCritical IllnessJapan