Nutrition-dense Smoothie Diets Reduced Dysphagia Risk in the Elderly

May 20, 2021 updated by: Mahidol University

The Effect of Nutrition-dense, Blenderized Enteral Nutrition From Natural Ingredients on Swallowing Capacity to Prevent Suffocation in the Elderly by Using Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES)

The investigators aimed to compare the effect of consuming high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas vs. consuming Ensure (a conventional well-known commercial formula) on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in the elderly people with dysphagia risk.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators aimed to determine the effect of 3 high protein (23-34% energy ratio) and low carbohydrate (25-38% energy ratio) smoothie formulas ((1) white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), (2) black sesame soy milk smoothie (low carbohydrate, BSLC), and (3) Chicken shitake smoothie (CS); 1 kcal/ml) from natural ingredients as compared with Ensure. The double blind randomized placebo controlled cross-over design study involved 63 subjects aged above 65 years old. They were also divided into asymptomatic (n=32) or symptomatic swallowing difficulty (n=31) group based on self-reported swallowing difficulty symptoms. All subjects assessed five drinks (WS, BSLC, CS vs. Ensure) for sensory testing, product acceptance and marketing survey using questionnaires. Swallowing capacity was determined by using Flexible Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES) only for each of the three drinks (SW, CS vs. Ensure) in a blinded random sequence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bangkok
      • Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • swallowing difficulty group (SSD) who with symptomatic swallowing difficulties or with a history of swallowing difficulties, coughing or choking when eating or drinking or a sign of malnutrition
  • control group (WSD) who without a history of swallowing difficulties, coughing or choking when eating or drinking or a sign of malnutrition

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. People with chronic illnesses and tube feeding
  2. People with anterior bone deformity e.g. facial fracture, sino-nasal or anterior skill-based tumor/surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: White sesame soy milk smoothie (WS)
a formula developed from natural ingredients such as soybean and white sesame
the effect of consuming white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) vs. Ensure on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
Active Comparator: Chicken shitake smoothie (CS)
a formula developed from natural ingredients such as chicken and shitake mushroom
the effect of consuming white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) vs. Ensure on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)
Placebo Comparator: Ensure
a conventional well-known commercial formula
the effect of consuming white sesame soy milk smoothie (WS), Chicken shitake smoothie (CS) vs. Ensure on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of severity of dysphagia as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time Frame: Baseline

Sum of FEES score from three symptoms consists of premature spillage of material, retention/pooling of material and/or secretion, and entrance of material and/or secretion into the larynx or trachea.

A healthcare professional evaluated in the five-point scoring system of each symptom.

FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level

Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Premature spillage of material as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time Frame: Baseline
levels of severity of food passed down through the pharynx before swallowing using the five-point scoring system FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Baseline
Retention/pooling of material and/or secretion as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time Frame: Baseline
levels of severity of food or saliva residue in the vallecular and/or pyriform regions of the pharynx after swallowing using the five-point scoring system FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Baseline
Entrance of material and/or secretion into the larynx or trachea; presence/absence of reflex cough as assessed by a healthcare professional using the FEES
Time Frame: Baseline
levels of severity of food passes through the larynx or trachea when swallowed with or without the cough reflex using the five-point scoring system FEES score = 5 means there were not exhibit disorder, FEES score = 1 means there were abnormalities at severe level
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia

Clinical Trials on the effect of consuming diets on the swallowing capacity by using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

Subscribe