Validation of the Gugging Swallowing Screen for the Intensive Care Unit (GUSS-ICU)

February 8, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Validation of the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS-ICU) for the Intensive Care Unit

Aetiology of dysphagia after extubation is unknown and considered to be multifactorial. Use of a standardized dysphagia- screening permits an early diagnosis. This study is to evaluate a new GUSS (gugging swallowing Screen) tool with multi-consistency check for intensive care patients (GUSS-ICU) with dysphagia. The concurrent validity (in terms of sensitivity and specificity) of the GUSS-ICU is analyzed in comparison to the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aetiology of dysphagia after extubation is unknown and considered to be multifactorial. Use of a standardized dysphagia- screening permits an early diagnosis. This study is to evaluate a new GUSS (gugging swallowing Screen) tool with multi-consistency check for intensive care patients (GUSS-ICU) with dysphagia. The concurrent validity (in terms of sensitivity and specificity) of the GUSS-ICU is analyzed in comparison to the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

The GUSS-ICU with multi-consistency check includes an indirect and a direct swallowing attempt. In indirect swallowing, the vigilance is first assessed on the basis of the RASS score (Richmond agitation-sedation scale), the presence of a stridor, the effectiveness of coughing and screeting, the possibility of swallowing saliva, drooling (saliva) and the change of voice after swallowing. If six points are reached, one can immediately proceed to the direct swallowing attempt. Unlike the original GUSS, the new GUSS-ICU direct swallowing test consists of 4 subtests with pulpy, liquid, solid and mixed solid-liquid consistency. The mixed solid-liquid consistency has been supplemented, as mixed consistencies require a more complex swallowing function with increased tongue- and lip coordination.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Logopädie, University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients treated in ICU with intubation time of at least 24 hours
  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)-Score of 0 (alert and calm) to 2 (agitated)
  • Inclusion in study not earlier than 1 hour after extubation
  • Mini-Mental-State (MMS) Score >/=24
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not capable to follow study procedures (language problems, mental disorder)
  • end of life- patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Swallowing test

Gugging swallowing screen - ICU (GUSS-ICU) index test:

Screening for post-extubation dysphagia: GUSS-ICU performed by 2 speech therapists independently. The GUSS-ICU model contains the core features of the original GUSS tool with the added assessment items specific to the ICU Patient (RASS score (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale)).

Stage one of the screen focuses on the preliminary investigation of indirect swallowing. Stage two is comprised of varying steps that directly test swallowing. This would include the administration of semisolids, water and bread with four distinct signs that were being assessed for - deglutition, coughing, drooling and voice change. The GUSS test is evaluated using a points system (0-10) which determines the severity of dysphagia and recommends a diet form that largely minimizes the risk of aspiration. (e.g. 10 points: No dysphagia = normal food).

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) reference test:

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is a technique to directly view the pharynx, larynx and esophagus during swallowing. The swallowing test is carried out first with saliva and then with different consistency (liquid, pulpy, solid) and different sized swallowing portions. This reference test is performed independently from the GUSS-ICU index test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of GUSS-ICU (%)
Time Frame: at baseline (up to 5 hours)
Sensitivity of GUSS-ICU for detection of dysphagia in ICU-patients after extubation (compared to FEES)
at baseline (up to 5 hours)
Specificity of GUSS-ICU (%)
Time Frame: at baseline (up to 5 hours)
Specificity of GUSS-ICU for detection of dysphagia in ICU-patients after extubation (compared to FEES)
at baseline (up to 5 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interrater Reliability of GUSS-ICU (Cohen's Kappa statistical analysis)
Time Frame: at baseline (up to 5 hours)
Interrater Reliability of GUSS-ICU for detection of dysphagia in ICU-patients after extubation
at baseline (up to 5 hours)
Validity of dysphagia severity
Time Frame: at baseline (up to 5 hours)
Validity of dysphagia severity (GUSS-ICU compared to FEES) by Spearman-correlation
at baseline (up to 5 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Troll, Logopädie (speech therapy), University Hospital Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia

Subscribe