- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04905134
Low-Cost, Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope in Head & Neck Cancers in Low Resource Settings - Optimization Phase
August 21, 2024 updated by: Duke University
Partnership to Establish a Practice Based Network to Assess for Head and Neck Cancers Using a Low-Cost Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope - Optimization Phase
This study aims to develop and evaluate a low-cost, portable, flexible nasopharyngeal scope (FNS) used to assess head and neck cancers (HNC) in low resource settings.
The FNS will be compared to an endoscope that is used as standard of care (SOC) in terms of ease of use, image quality, and perceived pain.
The ultimate goal is to compare the ease of use between the FNS to what is used in SOC.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
53
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Duke University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willing and able to provide signed and dated informed consent form
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
- Male or female, aged 18 or older
- Patients who clinical meet clinical criteria for SOC scope examination of the upper aerodigestive tract. This includes signs and symptoms such as dysphagia, nasal obstruction, neck mass, throat pain, and hoarseness.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Withdrawal of consent during the study duration
- Subjects who have complications from the SOC exam
- Anyone unable to under the SOC exam
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Patients evaluated using flexible nasopharyngoscope prototype device
|
Low-cost, flexible scope prototype will compared to standard of care scope used as standard of care.
|
|
No Intervention: Patients evaluated using standard of care nasopharyngoscope
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Providers using flexible nasopharyngoscope prototype device
|
Low-cost, flexible scope prototype will compared to standard of care scope used as standard of care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participant Exams in Which Providers Reported the FNS (Flexible Nasopharyngoscope) is Easy to Use
Time Frame: up to 15 minutes
|
Measured using a 5 point scale, with 1=Very hard, 2=Harder, 3=Same, 4=Easier and 5=Very Easy.
|
up to 15 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Image Quality of the Standard of Care (SOC) Scope as Measured on a 5-point Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Measured using a 5 point scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent.
Reported here is the number of participant exams in which providers scored the image quality of the SOC scope at each value.
|
Day 1
|
|
Image Quality of the Flexible Scope as Measured on a 5-point Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Measured using a 5 point scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent.
Reported here is the number of participant exams in which providers scored the image quality of the flexible scope at each value.
|
Day 1
|
|
Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event Following the Use of the Flexible Scope
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
|
Number of Patients Who Experienced More, the Same, or Less Pain/Discomfort With the Flexible Scope Compared With the Standard of Care (SOC) Scope
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Comparison made using a 3 point scale where 1=much more, 2=about the same, and 3=much less.
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Walter Lee, MD, Duke Health
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 31, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 22, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
September 22, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 24, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
May 27, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 19, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 21, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00102912
- 1R01DE028555-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- Protocol Number: 22-136-E (Other Identifier: NIDCR)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer
-
Robert FerrisAmgenCompletedHead and Neck Cancer | Cancer of Head and Neck | Head Cancer | Neck Cancer | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and Neck | Cancer of Neck | Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms | Neck Neoplasms | Cancer of the Head | Cancer of the Neck | UADT Neoplasms | Cancer of Head | Head Neoplasms | Head, Neck Neoplasms | Neoplasms, Head and other conditionsUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingHead and Neck Cancer | Head and Neck Neoplasms | Cancer of Head and Neck | Neoplasms, Head and Neck | Cancer of the Head and NeckEgypt
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedCancer Head Neck | Cancer Neck | Cancer, HeadUnited States
-
West China HospitalNot yet recruitingHead and Neck Cancer | Malignant Neoplasm | Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma | Head &Amp; Neck Cancer
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedRecurrent Head and Neck Cancer | Metastatic Head and Neck CancerUnited States
-
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaNestle Health Science; Akern SrlCompletedHead-neck CancerItaly
-
Radboud University Medical CenterUnknown
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompleted
-
Canadian Cancer Trials GroupCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingAdvanced Head and Neck CancerCanada
-
Centre Oscar LambretCompletedEpidermoid Head and Neck CancerFrance