Low-Cost, Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope in Head & Neck Cancers in Low Resource Settings - Optimization Phase

August 21, 2024 updated by: Duke University

Partnership to Establish a Practice Based Network to Assess for Head and Neck Cancers Using a Low-Cost Portable Flexible Nasopharyngoscope - Optimization Phase

This study aims to develop and evaluate a low-cost, portable, flexible nasopharyngeal scope (FNS) used to assess head and neck cancers (HNC) in low resource settings. The FNS will be compared to an endoscope that is used as standard of care (SOC) in terms of ease of use, image quality, and perceived pain. The ultimate goal is to compare the ease of use between the FNS to what is used in SOC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to provide signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Male or female, aged 18 or older
  • Patients who clinical meet clinical criteria for SOC scope examination of the upper aerodigestive tract. This includes signs and symptoms such as dysphagia, nasal obstruction, neck mass, throat pain, and hoarseness.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrawal of consent during the study duration
  • Subjects who have complications from the SOC exam
  • Anyone unable to under the SOC exam

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients evaluated using flexible nasopharyngoscope prototype device
Low-cost, flexible scope prototype will compared to standard of care scope used as standard of care.
No Intervention: Patients evaluated using standard of care nasopharyngoscope
Active Comparator: Providers using flexible nasopharyngoscope prototype device
Low-cost, flexible scope prototype will compared to standard of care scope used as standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participant Exams in Which Providers Reported the FNS (Flexible Nasopharyngoscope) is Easy to Use
Time Frame: up to 15 minutes
Measured using a 5 point scale, with 1=Very hard, 2=Harder, 3=Same, 4=Easier and 5=Very Easy.
up to 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image Quality of the Standard of Care (SOC) Scope as Measured on a 5-point Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
Measured using a 5 point scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent. Reported here is the number of participant exams in which providers scored the image quality of the SOC scope at each value.
Day 1
Image Quality of the Flexible Scope as Measured on a 5-point Scale
Time Frame: Day 1
Measured using a 5 point scale where 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=very good, and 5=excellent. Reported here is the number of participant exams in which providers scored the image quality of the flexible scope at each value.
Day 1
Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event Following the Use of the Flexible Scope
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Number of Patients Who Experienced More, the Same, or Less Pain/Discomfort With the Flexible Scope Compared With the Standard of Care (SOC) Scope
Time Frame: Day 1
Comparison made using a 3 point scale where 1=much more, 2=about the same, and 3=much less.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Walter Lee, MD, Duke Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00102912
  • 1R01DE028555-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • Protocol Number: 22-136-E (Other Identifier: NIDCR)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Cancer

Subscribe