Mechanisms Underlying Long-term Fatigue and Exercise Intolerance Following COVID-19 (MEXICO)

May 12, 2023 updated by: University College, London

Mechanisms Underlying Long-term Fatigue and Exercise Intolerance Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19)

The MEXICO study is an observational study that aims to identify underlying mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance in the presence of persistent COVID-19 symptoms (Long COVID).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Persistent symptoms of fatigue and severe exercise intolerance have been observed in some patients following infection with CoV-2. Termed 'Long COVID', these symptoms may persist for months after the acute infection has resolved. The mechanisms underlying exercise intolerance in Long COVID are not fully understood and could be the result of dysfunction at any point along the transfer pathway of oxygen from atmosphere to skeletal muscle (uptake in the lungs, heart and blood vessel function and metabolism within skeletal muscle).

The primary objective of the MEXICO study was to identify underlying mechanisms that contributed to exercise intolerance in the presence of persistent covid-19 symptoms (long COVID). Initially it was planned that this would involve a comparison of people with long COVID with and without exercise intolerance. It became clear that recruitment to these two groups was unlikely to complete as while most people with long COVID had some degree of exercise intolerance, severe exercise intolerance was infrequent. Consequently the study was revised to include a reference group of healthy individuals with the primary analysis focusing on a comparison of people with and without long COVID. A comparison of people with long COVID with or without severe exercise intolerance was retained as a secondary exploratory analysis. Ethical approval for the measurements conducted in healthy control subjects was granted by the UCL research ethics Committee.

Revised sample size calculations for study were based on a two-sample t-test (equal variance for simplicity - although the planned analysis would be using a doubly robust potential outcomes method accounting for potential confounders). Sample size estimates were performed using GPower 3.1.9.7 (alpha = 0.05 (two-tailed) and 80% power) assuming that the minimum clinically important difference for the primary outcomes corresponded to a standardized effect size of 0.88 based on previous studies (typically this represents a 10-20% difference in outcome measure). The study was designed to recruit cases and controls in an approximate proportion of 2:1 to enhance the power of the planned substudy analysis. On this basis 32 and 16 participants were required in the long COVID case and healthy group respectively (48 in total).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, WC1E6HX
        • University College London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population (n=51) are either patients with symptoms of Long COVID who have been referred for clinical investigation (with or without severe exercise impairment) or healthy controls.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Serological or clinical diagnosis of CoV-2 infection
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years old.
  • Considered a vulnerable adult
  • Participant unwilling to consent
  • Terminal illness or severe comorbidities affecting attendance or study investigations
  • Pregnancy
  • If the participant is not willing to give their consent for a clinical advisor to contact them if necessary
  • Inability or presence of a contra-indication for exercise testing
  • Chronic oral corticosteroid use (e.g. any maintenance dose of oral steroid, 4 or more course of oral steroid in previous 12 months, but not including prescription of dexamethasone during the acute episode of COVID-19, as long as that has been discontinued).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Long COVID with mild exercise impairment
Patients with prior serological or clinical diagnosis of CoV-2 infection and a referred to the UCLH Long-COVID clinic for persistent fatigue or exercise intolerance.
Healthy Control
Healthy sex-matched and age-matched to within 5 years of Long Covid participants were recruited from UCL staff and students.
Long COVID with severe exercise impairment
Patients with prior serological or clinical diagnosis of CoV-2 infection and a referred to the UCLH Long-COVID clinic for persistent fatigue or exercise intolerance and an abnormal walk test criteria included: peripheral oxygen desaturation, <85% predicted walk distance, a lactate rise> 1.0 from baseline or a Borg score > 5 for breathlessness or fatigue at end of test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary function (spirometry)
Time Frame: Baseline
Pulmonary function (ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) (FEV1/FVC)), measured using spirometry, is a co-primary outcome. Compare pulmonary function between long COVID patients with and without severe exercise impairment.
Baseline
Cardiac function (echocardiography)
Time Frame: Baseline
Cardiac function (ejection fraction), measured by echocardiography, is a co-primary outcome. Characterise and compare cardiac function between long COVID patients with and without severe exercise impairment.
Baseline
Microvascular function (microvascular reactivity)
Time Frame: Baseline
Microvascular reactivity, measured by near-infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), is a co-primary outcome. Characterise and compare microvascular function between long COVID patients with and without severe exercise impairment.
Baseline
Macrovascular function (central BP)
Time Frame: Baseline
Central blood pressure, measured by pulse wave analysis, is a co-primary outcome. Characterise and compare macrovascular function between long COVID patients with and without severe exercise impairment.
Baseline
Skeletal muscle oxidative capacity
Time Frame: Baseline
Skeletal muscle oxidative capacity (assessed as the rate of oxygen consumption recovery post-exercise), measured using NIRS, is a co-primary outcome. Characterise and compare skeletal muscle oxidative capacity between long COVID patients with and without severe exercise impairment.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max)
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months
Compare changes in VO2max, measured on cardiopulmonary exercise testing, to changes in key markers of the oxygen transport pathway (the primary outcomes).
Baseline and 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Professor Hughes, UCL, University College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Subscribe