Validation of an Electronic Remote Toxicity Management System in Cancer Patients (eRToMSy)

Validation of an Electronic Remote Toxicity Management System in Adult Cancer Patients Receiving an Active Anti-cancer Treatment

To assess the psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness) of the QuestOnco tool, an electronic Remote Toxicity Management System, in adult cancer patients receiving an active anti-cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study, a mobile phone-based remote monitoring system (QuestOnco application) was developed in order to enable the 'real-time' monitoring of patients' symptoms through use of ePROMs. In order to establish if this new application accurately and reliably identifies the anti-cancer treatment related symptoms, its psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness) have to be assessed.

Hypotheses:

  • The QuestOnco application will be designed as a promising innovative tool with good psychometric properties in order to detect more rapidly the anti-cancer-related toxicity in adult cancer patients.
  • The QuestOnco application is an accurate and reliable tool for the identification of the anti-cancer treatment related symptoms as much as current available questionnaires such as PRO-CTCAE and EORTC QLC-QC30 The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the QuestOnco application will be made in two phases. First, the patient's cognitive interviews will allow assessing the content validity of the items. Then focus groups including patients and professional experts will determine the QuestOnco application goals regarding the adverse symptoms management (recommendations provided within the application, connection with General practitioner, medical Oncology team or Emergency departments).

This study will assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the QuestOnco in a cohort of patients receiving anti-cancer treatments. The external validity will be directly compared to PRO-CTCAE (Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and to EORTC QLC-QC30 questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Metz, France, 57085
        • Centre Régional Metz-Thionville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (≥18 years);
  • Written and informed consent;
  • Diagnosis of solid cancer;
  • Metastatic or (neo)adjuvant anti-cancer treatment, including intravenous and/or oral treatments;
  • Patient physically/psychologically fit to participate in the study;
  • Patient able to understand, communicate and use the electronic device;
  • Patient owning a smartphone or tablet with internet connection;
  • Treatment supported by the French social security system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable patient for signing informed consent;
  • Unable to understand, communicate and use the electronic device;
  • Patient under trusteeship or guardianship;
  • Patient under legal or administration protection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adult cancer patients
Patients will be provided with the QuestOnco application for monitoring
Patients will be advised that they can still use their QuestOnco handset if they are hospitalized only for a treatment-related toxicity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Convergent validity
Time Frame: At the end of study completion (Week 6)

PRO-CTCAE The convergent validity will be evaluated by the correlation between the QuestOnco and the weekly paper form of the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire.

PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. It was designed to be used as a companion to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) External Web Site Policy, the standard lexicon for adverse event reporting in cancer clinical trials.

The PRO-CTCAE Item Library includes 124 items representing 78 symptomatic toxicities drawn from the CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE items evaluate the symptom attributes of frequency, severity, interference, amount, presence/absence. Each symptomatic AE is assessed by 1-3 attributes.

PRO-CTCAE responses are scored from 0 to 4 (minimum/maximum).

At the end of study completion (Week 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' comprehension of QuestOnco application items
Time Frame: At the end of the study completion: Phase I (Day 7)

Semi-structured cognitive interviews:

Interviews will be conducted to evaluate patients' comprehension of the QuestOnco application items. Items will be modified and restested if more than 2 patients manifest cognitive difficulties. The item modifications will be conducted during focus groups gathering experts including Emergency department practitioners, General practitioner, Oncologists, Pharmacists, and Methodologists. This procedure will be repeated 3 times a maximum for a total of 30 patients.

At the end of the study completion: Phase I (Day 7)
The known-groups validity assessment
Time Frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
The known-groups validity will be assessed by comparing the QuestOnco items between patients with high and low performance status using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-1 vs 2-4 (minimum vs maximum).
At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Evaluation of the efficacy of the QuestOnco application in patient care
Time Frame: At the end of study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the time spent (minutes) in consultation with the Oncologist using QuestOnco application fill form
At the end of study completion (Week 6)
Evaluation of the responsiveness of the QuestOnco application in patient care
Time Frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the number (percent) of appointments actually realized using QuestOnco application fill form
At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
The reliability of the QuestOnco application in patient care
Time Frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the number (percent) of the automatic telephone alert calls to the regional Emergency service using QuestOnco application fill form
At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Synchronization of departments (Emergency division, Oncology team) and patients' care
Time Frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Calculation of the number (percent) of scheduled consultation based on the statement of reported-toxicity score (symptom severity from grades II to IV) of cancer patients using electronic mobile QuestOnco application.
At the end of the study completion (Week 6)
Evaluation of the Quality of Life of patients who use QuestOnco healthcare mobile application
Time Frame: At the end of the study completion (Week 1 and 6)
The patients' quality of life will be assessed using EORTC QLC-QC30 questionnaire The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item core-cancer-specific questionnaire-integrating system for assessing the health-related QOL of cancer patients participating in international clinical trials. The questionnaire incorporates five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health and QOL scale, and single items for the assessment of additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (e.g., dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as the perceived financial impact of the disease and treatment. All items are scored on 4-point Likert scales, ranging from 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much'), with the exception of two items in the global health/QOL scale which use modified 7-point linear analog scales.
At the end of the study completion (Week 1 and 6)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raffaele LONGO, CHR Metz Thionville
  • Study Director: Véronique NOIREZ, CHR Metz Thionville

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-01-CHRMT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on uses of an application

Subscribe