Efficacy and Safety of VER-01 in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

April 5, 2024 updated by: Vertanical GmbH

Proof of Efficacy, Maintenance of Efficacy, Long-term Safety and Investigation of the Potential for Dependence and Abuse and the Effect of Abrupt Drug Withdrawal of VER-01 in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Analysis of the efficacy, maintenance of efficacy, long-term safety, and investigation of the potential for dependence and abuse and the effect of abrupt drug withdrawal of VER-01 in the treatment of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain when drug treatment is indicated and previous optimised treatments with non-opioid analgesics have not led to sufficient pain relief or were unsuitable due to contraindications or intolerance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is divided into four phases: Phase A, B, C and D. All patients who have completed Phase A and for whom the investigator considers further participation to be safe shall begin Phase B. Phases C and D run in parallel, so that patients who have completed Phase B and for whom the investigator considers further participation to be safe can be assigned to one of the two phases.

Phases A and D follow a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, while Phase B and C have an open-label design.

The main goal of Phase A is to demonstrate the efficacy of VER-01 compared to placebo. In Phase B and C the main goal is the investigation of long-term safety of VER-01. In Phase D the primary objective is to demonstrate the maintenance of efficacy of VER-01 on a placebo-controlled basis.

The potential for dependence and abuse will be analyzed in all Phases (A,B,C,D), while the effect of abrupt drug withdrawal of VER-01 will be analyzed in Phase C and D.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

820

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10629
        • emovis GmbH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female patients (18 years and older)
  2. Chronic (for at least three months) non-specific pain in the lower back (between the lower ribcage and the gluteal folds)
  3. Pain intensity on average at least 4 points on an 11-point NRS (one month before the start of the study)
  4. Patients with indicated drug treatment where previous optimised treatments with non-opioid analgesics have not led to sufficient pain relief or were unsuitable due to contraindications or intolerance.
  5. Willingness of both men and women to use a reliable method of contraception during study participation and for three months after taking the last dose of the IMP
  6. Signed patient information and informed consent form is available
  7. Understanding of the German language, ability to give consent and compliance
  8. The patient has understood the instructions to avoid changes in lifestyle and dietary habits
  9. The patient has understood the principle of the patient diary and gives their consent to keep it as instructed

Additional for Phase A

a1. Pain intensity averaged at least 4 points on an 11-point NRS (there must be at least 5 pain intensity readings in the morning from the run-in phase)

a2. Willingness not to take any analgesic medication (non-opioid and opioid analgesics as well as adjuvant analgesics) during participation in study Phase A (except rescue medication)

a3. Willingness to continue a current non-drug therapy unchanged as planned during participation in Phase A

Additional for Phase B

b1. Previous and complete participation in Phase A until and including Visit A6

b2. Patient wishes to participate voluntarily in the long-term study

b3. From the investigator's point of view, further participation is considered medically safe

b4. Willingness not to take any additional analgesic medication (non-opioid and opioid analgesics as well as adjuvant analgesics) during the last three weeks of study Phase B (except rescue medication).

Additional for Phase C

c1. Previous and complete participation in Phase B until and including Visit B10

c2. Patient wishes to participate voluntarily in the long-term study

c3. From the investigator's point of view, further participation is considered medically safe

Additional for Phase D

d1. Previous and complete participation in Phase B until and including Visit B10 (patients received Ver-01 for 26 weeks)

d2. Patient has experienced a pain score improvement of at least 30% in treatment Phase B (mean value of the study week 43 compared to the mean value of the run-in phase, there must be at least four values from study week 43 and five values from the run-in phase)

d3. Patient wishes to participate voluntarily in the study

d4. From the investigator's point of view, further participation is considered medically safe

d5. Willingness not to take any analgesic medication (non-opioid and opioid analgesics as well as adjuvant analgesics) during participation in study Phase D (except rescue medication)

d6. Willingness to continue a current non-drug therapy unchanged as planned during study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Professional groups for which the ability to operate machinery and drive vehicles is the primary activity (including truck, bus and forklift drivers, pilots)
  2. Alcohol/drug/medication abuse and previous or current intake of methadone in the patient's medical history or suspected by the investigator
  3. Intake of analgesic medication (non-opioid and opioid analgesics as well as adjuvant analgesics) within seven days prior to the start of the study
  4. Taking cannabis-based products within 30 days prior to the start of the study
  5. HIV, dementia (which impairs the assessment of symptoms)
  6. Severe forms of the following diseases: Anaemia,hematological/autoimmune/endocrinal/ renal/hepatic/respiratory/cardiovascular or gastrointestinal diseases, symptomatic peripheral vascular diseases
  7. Cardiovascular event in the past three months, poorly managed high blood pressure, untreated hypothyroidism, patients with Crigler-Najjar syndrome or Rotor syndrome, surgery within the past two months
  8. Severe mental illnesses (e.g. psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), severe depression that is not due to the chronic non-specific low back pain, or individuals at risk of suicide (examined using the MINI questionnaire)
  9. Severe mental illness (psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, severe depression, anxiety disorder) in a first-degree relative (parents and children); suicide in a first-degree relative (parents and children)
  10. Patients with an active cancer or tumor-related pain or severe pain due to physical injury
  11. Other painful comorbidities, excluding low back pain, that could interfere with the patient's evaluation during the study or the assessment of pain
  12. Well-known strong adverse events in connection with cannabis consumption before the start of the study
  13. Known allergy to cannabis and/or sesame seeds and products derived from them
  14. Known hypersensitivity to the ingredients of the rescue medication
  15. Planned blood donation, planned sperm or egg donation, planned freezing of eggs or sperm
  16. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, desire to have children (within the next 20 months)
  17. Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days before the start of the study
  18. Inability to give consent, care dependency, patient has a legal guardian/caregiver, or is immobile
  19. The patient is in need of special protection (e.g., incarcerated; institutionalized by a court or judicial authority; in a dependent or employment relationship with the sponsor, an external service provider of the sponsor (who is involved in the study conduct), the investigator, or the study site).

Additional for Phase A:

a1. In the case of a current non-drug therapy (e.g. physical or behavioural therapy, acupuncture,massage, thermotherapy), which significantly modulates the perception of pain, it was not maintained unchanged for at least eight weeks prior to study participation in Phase A.

Additional for Phase D

d1. Intake of additional analgesic medication (non-opioid and opioid analgesics as well as adjuvant analgesics) within 21 days prior to the start of study Phase D (except rescue medication).

d2. In the case of a current non-drug therapy (e.g. physical or behavioural therapy, acupuncture,massage, thermotherapy) that significantly modulates the perception of pain, it was not maintained unchanged for at least nine weeks prior to the start of study Phase D.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VER-01
VER-01 is administered orally (b.i.d.) using a dosing syringe. One unit corresponds to 2.5 mg THC. The optimal dose is titrated on a patient-by-patient basis. The maximum daily dose should not exceed 13 dose units (32.5 mg THC).
standardised cannabis extract (containing 21 mg THC per gram drug product)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The Placebo is administered orally (b.i.d.) using a dosing syringe. The optimal dose is titrated on a patient-by-patient basis, analogous to VER-01.
comparator without active ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase A: Efficacy based on pain reduction
Time Frame: Baseline up to 15 weeks
Change in average pain intensity compared to baseline on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, where 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable) (mean value of study week 15 compared to the mean value of the seven-day run-in phase with daily documentation of pain intensity in the morning).
Baseline up to 15 weeks
Phase B: Safety based on occurrence of treatment-related AEs/SAEs
Time Frame: Up to 29 weeks
Safety and adverse reactions based on occurrence of treatment-related AEs/SAEs
Up to 29 weeks
Phase C: Safety based on occurrence of treatment-related AEs/SAEs
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks
Safety and adverse reactions based on occurrence of treatment-related AEs/SAEs
Up to 28 weeks
Phase D: Maintenance of efficacy
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks (from date of randomization R2 until the first day of treatment failure)
Time until treatment failure defined as the time in days from randomization to phase D (R2) until the first day of treatment failure. Treatment failure is assessed by the daily calculated seven-day mean value of the pain score (11 point Numerical Rating Scale, NRS, where 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable) in the morning during the treatment period, which must have deteriorated by at least 20% and at least one point compared to baseline (mean value of study week 43). The first day of treatment failure is then the earliest day within this seven-day time window to which this criterion applies as a single day. Furthermore, treatment failure is defined as a premature discontinuation of treatment for selected reasons.
Up to 4 weeks (from date of randomization R2 until the first day of treatment failure)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase A, B, C, D: Mean change in neuropathic pain
Time Frame: Day 1, day 106, day 309, day 351, day 505
Absolute change compared to baseline (day1) Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) total score at the end of each treatment phase in patients with neuropathic pain
Day 1, day 106, day 309, day 351, day 505
Phase A, B, C, D: Change in pain intensity in the morning, as well as in the morning and evening
Time Frame: Baseline up to 72 weeks
Absolute changes from baseline in mean pain intensity at the end of each treatment phase measured in the morning (primary endpoint of Phase A) or morning and evening on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, where 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable)
Baseline up to 72 weeks
Phases A, B, C and D: Pain responders (30 percent and 50 percent) in the morning, as well as in the morning and evening
Time Frame: Baseline up to 72 weeks
The number and proportion of 30 percent and 50 percent pain responders in the morning, and morning and evening at the end of each treatment phase.
Baseline up to 72 weeks
Phases A, B, C and D: Sleep quality (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 72 weeks
The absolute change from baseline in mean sleep quality at the end of each treatment phase measured on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, where 0=not impacted to 10=completely impacted)
Baseline up to 72 weeks
Phase A: Sleep quality (MOS-SS)
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 22, Day 50, Day 78, Day 106
Absolute changes from baseline of sleep quality measured by Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) per survey point
Day 1, Day 22, Day 50, Day 78, Day 106
Phase A: Intake of rescue and concomitant medication
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
Cumulative dose of rescue medication taken in Phase A
Up to 16 weeks
Phase D: Intake of rescue and concomitant medication
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Cumulative dose of rescue medication taken in Phase D
Up to 6 weeks
Phases A, B, C and D: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 72 weeks
Scores and absolute changes from baseline of depression, anxiety and stress levels measured by the DASS (where 0=did not apply to me at all to 3=affected me very greatly or most of the time) per time point of assessment
Baseline up to 72 weeks
Phases A, B, C and D: Global assessment of symptoms (patient global impression of change, PGIC)
Time Frame: Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Percentage of patients by category of the global assessment of symptoms (PGIC, 7-point Likert scale where 0=very much better to 6=very much worse) by the patient per survey point
Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Phases A, B, C and D: Satisfaction with the treatment result - patient
Time Frame: Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Percentage of patients by category of the satisfaction with the treatment outcome (5-point Likert scale, where 0=very satisfied to 4=very unsatisfied) by the patient per survey point
Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Phases A, B, C and D: Satisfaction with the treatment result - investigator
Time Frame: Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Percentage of patients by category of satisfaction with the treatment outcome (5-point Likert scale, where 0=very satisfied to 4=very unsatisfied) by the investigator per survey point.
Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Phases A, B, C and D: Satisfaction with tolerability - patient
Time Frame: Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Percentage of patients by category of satisfaction with the tolerability (5-point Likert scale, where 0=very satisfied to 4=very unsatisfied) by the patient per survey point
Day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Phase A: Safety and adverse reactions
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
Safety and adverse reactions based on occurrence of treatment-related AEs/SAEs
Up to 16 weeks
Phase D: Safety and adverse reactions
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Safety and adverse reactions based on occurrence of treatment-related AEs/SAEs
Up to 6 weeks
Phases A, B, C and D: Quality of life scores (Short Form 36, SF-36)
Time Frame: Day 1, day 22, day 50, day 78, day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Scores in quality of life measured per survey point
Day 1, day 22, day 50, day 78, day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Phases A, B, C and D: Quality of life absolute changes (Short Form 36, SF-36)
Time Frame: Day 1, day 22, day 50, day 78, day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Absolute changes in quality of life from baseline (day 1) measured per survey point
Day 1, day 22, day 50, day 78, day 106, day 309, day 491, day 337
Phase A: Scores in bodily function and impairment due to low back pain (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, RMD)
Time Frame: Day 1, day 22, day 106
Scores in bodily function and impairment due to low back pain assessed by the RMD per survey point
Day 1, day 22, day 106
Phase A: Absolute changes in bodily function and impairment due to low back pain(Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, RMD)
Time Frame: Day 1, day 22, day 106
Absolute changes in bodily function and impairment due to low back pain assessed by the RMD per survey point
Day 1, day 22, day 106
Phases A, B, C and D: Addiction (Addiction Behaviors Checklist ,ABC)
Time Frame: Day 22, day 50, day 78, day 106, day 127, day 183, day 239, day 309, day 365, day 421, day 491, day 337
The absolute number of positive answers of the ABC
Day 22, day 50, day 78, day 106, day 127, day 183, day 239, day 309, day 365, day 421, day 491, day 337
Phase C: Diagnosis of substance dependence ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems)
Time Frame: Day 491
The absolute number of positive answers according to the German Bundesärztekammer (2007) is summarized descriptively according to the standard for continuous parameters.
Day 491
Phase A, B, C and D: Adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 72 weeks
Occurrence of AEs/SAEs
Through study completion, up to 72 weeks
Phase C: Withdrawal symptoms (Cannabis Withdrawal Scale, CWS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 weeks
Sum scores for intensity and functional impairment are descriptively analysed according to Allsop et al.
Up to 2 weeks
Phase D: Withdrawal symptoms (Cannabis Withdrawal Scale, CWS)
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
Sum scores for intensity and functional impairment are descriptively analysed according to Allsop et al.
Up to 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joachim Nadstawek, Prof., Schmerzzentrum Bonn

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VER-CLBP-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on VER-01

3
Subscribe