Psychologic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Hospital Staff of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Area (IMPSY-COV)

Psychologic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Hospital Staff of the Nouvelle Aquitaine Area : a Prospective Longitudinal Study by Self-administered Questionnaires

Evaluation of the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital staff in the French Nouvelle Aquitaine area, through a longitudinal study with repeated self-administered psychologic scales

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Evaluation of the psychological impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on hospital personnel in Nouvelle Aquitaine. IMPSY-COV Upon recent outbreaks of new diseases (SARS, MERS-CoV, Ebola) have led to the emergence of psychiatric disorders in healthcare workers , such as post-traumatic stress , anxiety (e.g., panic attacks) or depressive episodes. Observed similarities in between propagation patterns of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS, alow us to expect the occurence of similar psychiatric disorders in COVID-19 context to those described (Vignaud, Prieto, 2020). The study is set up to assess the psychological state of hospital personnel in the working conditions of treating COVID-19 suffering patients.

87000 hospital staff workers from the Nouvelle Aquitaine region will be invited to take part in the study. This includes medical and non-medical professionals from general and psychiatric hospitals exposed to COVID-19.

Study design. The protocol shows two phases and five measurement timepoints. In the initial phase (T0), eligible persons will be contacted via email. Those wishing to participate will then consent, answer socio-demographic questions and a series of psychology questionnaires. In the longitudinal phase, participants will be again invited to answer the same series of questionnaires four times: one month after the initial phase (T1), 3 months after (T2), 6 months after (T3) and 12 months after (T4).

Statistical analysis. In order to identify the consequences generated by COVID-19 in hospital personnel through a longitudinal protocol, several statistical analyses are considered, including logistic and linear regressions as well as ANOVA and MANOVA.

Expected outcomes. The study will assess the occurrence and the evolution of psychological distress and identify vulnerability factors that may trigger psychiatric disorders in these situations. The study will also provide an opportunity to improve the supporting actions of professionals affected by the crisis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

8000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or more
  • hospital workers exposed to COVID-19
  • consented to participate to the study
  • master the french langage
  • Understanding of type, objectives and study methology
  • accept an on-line evaluation
  • Benefit from health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refuse to participate
  • pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Be under measure of legal protection: guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: unique study arm
Initial socio-demographic questionnaire 5 timepoints psychologic and self-administered questionnaires
longitunidal descriptive study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in anxiety disorder overcome
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12

GAD-7 score:

> 7 , the anxiety disorder status is "supected", [5; 9] corresponds to anxiety evaluation: "light" [10; 14] corresponds to anxiety evaluation: "moderate" > 15, corresponds to anxiety evaluation: "severe"

inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Changes in anxiety disorder overcome
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
PDSR verifies that maximum of the panic state is reached within ten minutes
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination and collection of lived traumatic events types
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5)
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms presence and measurment
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) PCL-5 score > 32 indicate presence of Posttraumatic Stress Trouble (PST)
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
2-last-week mood assessment
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Beck Depression Inventory - Fast Screen - France (BDI-FS FR) score > 13 indicates presence of a depressive trouble
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Identification of coping pattern to stress
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) questionnaire Participant assess from 'little" to "a lot" his tendency to adopt a task, emotion or behaviour based pattern
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Burn out diagnosis
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12

MASLACH BURNOUT INVENTORY (MBI questionnaire) assessment of the 3 aspects from low to high

  • burn out feeling
  • deshumanisation
  • accomplishment at work
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Self evaluation of state of health
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
considering the 4-last-weeks the participant will assess 8 under-scales for score 0 to 100 (favourable)
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Psycho active drugs intakes and level of intake over the last month
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
selection of the drug and level of intake will n*be assessed 'none', "new", "increasing", constant"
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
Evaluation of the CUMP support to health professionnals
Time Frame: inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12
answer "yes' or "no" support has been contacted already or since the last study assessement
inclusion, month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Actually no sharing expected

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on self administered questionnaire

Subscribe