Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerve of Intubated Patients (STIMIT-I)

October 26, 2021 updated by: Stefan J Schaller, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Electromagnetic Stimulation of the Phrenic Nerve to Generate Contraction of the Diaphragm in Anesthetized and Intubated Patients - a Proof-of-concept Study

Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction is a common issue in critically ill patients. Muscle stimulation has shown to have beneficial effects in muscle groups on the extremities. A non-invasive way to stimulate the diaphragm would be the electromagnetic stimulation but it is currently unclear if that is feasible.

In this proof-of-concept trial the primary aim is to show that it is possible to induce a diaphragmatic contraction leading to an inspiration with a sufficient tidal volume via an external electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

During the time of first spontaneous breathing trial 60% of mechanically ventilated patients present with diaphragmatic weakness or also know as ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD). The damage to the diaphragm in terms of muscle atrophy has been shown as early as 12 hours after initiation of mechanical ventilation. Recently, a correlation between diaphragmatic atrophy and mortality could be established.

Induction of diaphragmatic contractions via stimulation of the phrenic nerve would be a possible method to prevent or treat VIDD. A possible modality would be the non-invasive electromagnetic stimulation but feasibility has not been established.

In this proof-of-concept trial the primary aim is to show that it is possible to induce a diaphragmatic contraction leading to an inspiration with a sufficient tidal volume via an external electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charité - Univiversitätsmedizin Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists Classification I or II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic lung disease
  • Preexisting diaphragmatic weakness
  • Neurologic disease with known motor weakness
  • Paralysis of the phrenic nerve
  • Contraindication for any movement in the cervical vertebrae
  • Conditions that limit the movement of the diaphragm e.g. ascites, increased intraabdominal pressure, adipositas.
  • Inability to communicate in the official language
  • Infections, lesions or stricture in the neck area
  • Implanted cardiac devices e.g. pace maker, defibrillator, event recorder
  • Implanted medical pumps e.g. left ventricular assist device
  • Metal implants in the upper body
  • Preganancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Electromagnetic stimulation
Electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve.
Electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tidal volume generated by electromagentical stimulation of the phrenic nerve (ml)
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Mean tidal volume of 10 consecutively stimulations of the phrenic nerve
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tidal volume per breath
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Tidal volume
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Max inspiratory flow after stimulation
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
The maximal air flow created in the duct following stimulation of the N. phrenicus (meter / second)
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Abdominal extension maximum
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Extension of the abdomen measured via in abdominal belt
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Air pressure during each breath
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Change in pressure in the duct from expiration to inspiration (mbar)
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Diaphragmatic thickening fraction
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Diaphragmatic contractility measured by ultrasound after N. phrenicus stimulation
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Feedback/Stimulation locus relation
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
When the stimulation locus is changed according to protocol the change of the triggered breath is measured in % to the original location.
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Latency between stimulation and feedback
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Time between start and end of the stimulation in seconds
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Intensity/Contractility relation
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Correlation between the simulation intensity and the diaphragmatic contractility
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Time to find the optimal stimulation point of the N. phrenicus
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Time between first successful N. phrenicus stimulation and identification of the optimal stimulation locus in seconds
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Distance between anatomical landmarks and optimal stimulation locus
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Distance between anatomical landmarks and optimal stimulation locus
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Reproducibility of stimulation answer
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Variation of stimulated tidal volumes and diaphragm contraction
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)
Adverse Events elicited by the electromagnetic stimulation
Study duration (approximately 10 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan J Schaller, Prof. Dr., Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified data can be requested on reasonable scientific request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of scientific manuscript.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Deidentified data can be requested on reasonable scientific request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness

Clinical Trials on Electromagnetic stimulation

Subscribe