Empowering Older Adults for Healthy Living and Better Dental Health

March 22, 2023 updated by: Gao Xiaoli, National University of Singapore

Developing and Evaluating a Theory-derived Intervention to Improve Oral Health of Community-dwelling Elderly

Ageing of the world's population is accelerating. Despite the health challenges they face, older people should not be stereotyped as frail and dependent. Healthy ageing is possible if adequate care is provided and effective intervention is delivered for healthy living. Common oral diseases (dental caries and periodontal diseases) are determined to a great extent by health behaviours (diet and oral hygiene) and are controllable through effective interventions. Hence, this study aims to test the theoretical models for health promotion, develop theory-derived intervention, and evaluate its effectiveness in improving oral health of older adults. The study hypothesis is that theory-derived intervention is more effective than conventional health education in eliciting positive behaviours and controlling oral diseases in older adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study targets older adults and aims to (i) test the explanatory power of the dominant theoretical models/ frameworks, (ii) develop theory-derived intervention, and (iii) evaluate the effectiveness of the theory-derived intervention. The hypothesis is that theoretical-derived intervention is more effective than conventional health education in improving oral health behaviours and preventing oral diseases among older adults.

The sample size needed for this study was calculated by using the software G*Power version 3.1.9.2 (Franz Faul, University of Kiel, Germany). The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcomes, namely increment of coronal caries and increment of root caries, and independent t-tests for comparing means of two independent groups. A caries incidence study among the elderly reported that the mean (SD) 5-year caries incidence were 2.65 (3.14) for coronal caries and 2.21 (2.83) for root caries 17. The 2-year incidence of coronal caries and root caries were therefore estimated to be 1.06 (1.26) and 0.88 (1.13), respectively, in the control group. The effect of an intervention is considered clinically significant if it reduces the caries incidence by 40%. Based on a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, 140 subjects per group are needed for coronal caries and 165 subjects are needed for root caries outcome measures. To take both outcome measures into account, the higher number (i.e., n=165) will be adopted. Allowing for a 25% attrition rate, 220 elderly persons will need to be recruited into each group, giving a total sample size of 440.

Each participant will be required to complete a detailed questionnaire at the initial visit through face-to-face interviews. Information on socio-demographic background (gender, age, education level, past occupation, and type of housing) and oral health behaviours (diet, toothbrushing and dental flossing) will be collected. The questionnaire will also include the scales for three dominant theoretical models, namely, Health Belief Model (HBM), Theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT).

The theoretical model that best explains the health behaviours will be selected for designing oral health intervention. Intervention materials and activities will be carefully designed to address all the constructs/ domains of the selected theoretical model(s). Relevant medical literatures will be referred to. The needs, interest, and health literary of the target group (i.e. older adults of varied social and educational backgrounds) will be taken into full consideration. The intervention will be tested in a small group of 15-20 older people to ensure its relevance, practicality, and acceptability.

Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups, stratified by gender and education level. Allocation concealment will be ensured by using sealed opaque envelopes. The two groups will receive conventional health education and theory-derived intervention, respectively.

At baseline and 6-, 12-, and 24-months post-intervention, each participant will a) undergo an oral examination (dental checkup) by a trained dentist, who will be calibrated against an experienced oral epidemiologist and blinded to the group allocation, and b) complete a questionnaire (detailed questionnaire at baseline and short questionnaire for follow-ups). Chi-square tests will be used for comparing proportions. Parametric or non-parametric methods will be adopted for comparing means. ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) and multiple regressions will be performed to evaluate the effects of various factors on the outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

440

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 119085
        • Recruiting
        • Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 55-70 years old
  • Living in the community (alone or with family members), instead of residing in a nursing home
  • Having at least 8 natural teeth
  • No plan to immigrate in 3 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Life-threatening disease; impaired cognitive function (e.g. Alzheimer's syndrome); radiotherapy in the head and neck region

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Theory-derived intervention
Questionnaire will be used including the scales for three dominant theoretical models, Health Belief Model (HBM), Theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The theoretical model that best explains the health behaviours of the selected participants will be selected for designing oral health intervention.The theory-derived intervention will address the constructs/domains of the selected model(s) in the context of the three target behaviours (diet, toothbrushing and dental flossing).
The intervention will be delivered through multimedia materials and group activities, as appropriate. Participants will spend approximately 30-45 minutes for the intervention. Intervention materials and activities will be carefully designed to address all the constructs/ domains of the selected theoretical model(s). The effectiveness of the interventions will be evaluated using behavioural outcomes (diet, brushing, flossing) and clinical outcomes (oral hygiene, caries and periodontal conditions).
Active Comparator: Conventional health education
Participants will be randomly assigned to the control group, stratified by gender and education level. Allocation concealment will be ensured by using sealed opaque envelopes.
The conventional health education will be delivered through an oral health talk and oral health booklet. Topics covered are: (i) common oral diseases and its consequences; (ii) common dental problems among older adults; (iii) importance of oral health measures (healthy diet, toothbrushing and dental flossing); and (iv) proper techniques for toothbrushing and dental flossing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Increment of coronal caries
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Number of new surfaces with coronal caries
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Increment of root caries
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Number of new surfaces with root caries
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in dietary behaviours (favourable/unfavourable)
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention

Using a questionnaire, dietary behaviours will be categorised into:

  1. favourable (frequency of snack intake, sweet/desert intake and/or sugary drinks <2times/day)
  2. unfavourable (frequency of snack intake, sweet/desert intake and/or sugary drinks >=2times/day)
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Change in flossing behaviours (favourable/unfavourable)
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Using questionnaire to evaluate frequency of flossing (with >=once/day considered as favourable and <once/day considered unfavourable)
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Change in toothbrushing behaviours (favourable/unfavourable)
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention

Using a questionnaire, toothbrushing behaviours will be categorised as:

  1. favourable (frequency of brushing >=2times/day)
  2. unfavourable (frequency of brushing <2times/day)
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Change in oral hygiene status (plaque score)
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Presence or absence of dental plaque on tooth surfaces
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Change in periodontal condition
Time Frame: From baseline to 2 years post-intervention
Number of sites with deep periodontal pockets, shallow periodontal pockets, and gingival bleeding only
From baseline to 2 years post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gao Xiaoli, PhD, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Theory-derived intervention

Subscribe