Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades

October 26, 2023 updated by: Hyungseok Seo, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Using Two Types of Blade in Patients Receiving Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope: Channeled Blade vs. Non-channeled Blade

The present study compares two different types of videolaryngoscope blade, which is a channeled and non-channeled blade. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of the type of videolaryngoscope blade on the intubation condition.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In tracheal intubation for general anesthesia, one of the two types of the blade during a video laryngoscopy can be used, one is a channeled blade that has a channel for tracheal tube launching, the other is a non-channeled blade. In the present study, the outcomes by using two types of the videolaryngoscope blade such as the intubation condition, intubation time, first-pass rate, and the incidence of intubation-related complications were compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05278
        • Kyung Hee University Gangdong Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving tracheal intubation for general anesthesia
  • Patients with physical status 1, 2, or 3 by American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 or >35 kg/m2
  • Patients with a history of airway surgery
  • Patients with increased risk of aspiration
  • Patients who have any pathology (polyp, tumor, or inflammation) in the upper airway and larynx

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Channeled group
Group of patients using a channeled blade for videolaryngoscopy
Device: Channeled blade
In the present group, a tracheal tube was launched in the channel of the blade before tracheal intubation
Active Comparator: Non-channeled group
Group of patients using a non-channeled blade (standard type) for videolaryngoscopy
Device: Non-channeled blade
In the present group, a tracheal tube was not launched in the videolaryngoscope blade before tracheal intubation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intubation time
Time Frame: Immediately after tracheal intubation completed
the time for tracheal intubation
Immediately after tracheal intubation completed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First-pass rate
Time Frame: Immediately after tracheal intubation completed
the success rate of tracheal intubation with one attempt
Immediately after tracheal intubation completed
Intubation-related complications
Time Frame: within 24 hours after surgery
the incidence of overall complications related with tracheal intubation
within 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hyungseok Seo, MD, PhD, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KHNMC 2019-07-020-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation Complication

Clinical Trials on Channeled blade

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Romania

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe