A Longitudinal Study on Longstanding Complicated Fatigue

May 19, 2025 updated by: Anna Andreasson, Stockholm University

A Longitudinal Study on Longstanding Complicated Fatigue: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Burnout Syndrome and Post-covid Fatigue

The purpose of the study is to investigate if there are common biopsychosocial vulnerability factors for developing and maintaining fatigue, regardless of the diagnosis. The investigators also believe that subgroups differ in terms of these factors. Participating patients with ME/CFS, burnout syndrome and post-covid fatigue complete a web form at inclusion and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. There is no upper limit for the number of participants in the web survey. 150 participants are asked to submit blood samples at a local laboratory in connection with the questionnaires for analysis of inflammatory markers and one urine sample for analysis of nutritional markers. Two control groups are included, 150 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 50 healthy individuals. The longitudinal design makes it possible to investigate how inflammatory markers, nutritional status, symptom burden, health related quality of life co-vary over time and how work ability and sick leave is affected.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Fatigue is associated with impaired health and severely impaired quality of life and function and there is a need to explore similarities and differences regarding biopsychosocial vulnerability and maintenance factors and consequences in terms of work ability and sick leave in chronic fatigue syndrome (ME / CFS), burnout syndrome (BS) and post-covid fatigue to be able to improve individualized interventions for patient with persistent fatigue. The study examines inflammatory markers, nutritional status, symptom burden, neuropsychiatric conditions, work ability, and sick leave in a longitudinal cohort study over 2 years in patients with different diagnoses who all suffer from persistent fatigue. The hypothesis is that there are common biopsychosocial vulnerability factors for developing and maintaining fatigue, regardless of the diagnosis. The investigators also believe that subgroups can be identified that differ in terms of these factors. The longitudinal design makes it possible to investigate how inflammatory markers, nutritional status, symptom burden, health related quality of life co-vary over time and how work ability and sick leave is affected.

In this study participating patients with ME/CFS, BS and post-covid fatigue complete a web form at inclusion and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Adult patients registered with a diagnosis of chronic complicated fatigue (ME/CFS or post-covid syndrome) in Take Care (medical record system in Stockholm County, Sweden) or with burnout syndrome from Stressmottagningen Stockholm, will be asked to participate in the study.

  • Patients with ME/CFS will be recruited at the Department of Behavior Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Solna or reached by advertising on social media
  • Patients with Post-covid-syndrome will be recruited at Karolinska University Hospital or reached by advertising on social media
  • Patients with burnout syndrome will be recruited at Stressmottagningen Stockholm

At baseline, a clinical assessment is performed at the clinic and the patient is asked to leave a venous blood sample and complete a questionnaire. The patients are asked for further blood samples and questionnaires at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after baseline. 150 participants, 50 in each diagnostic group, are asked to submit blood samples for biobanking at a local laboratory in connection to the questionnaire time points for analysis of inflammatory markers. C-reactive protein (CRP) is analysed at the time of blood samples. They are also asked to give one urine sample for analysis of nutritional markers and to submit a 3-day diet diary for evaluation of dietary intake by a registered dietitian. Participants that only fill out the web-based questionnaire will be included. There is no upper limit for the number of participants in the web survey.

A pilot study with 20 participants with ME/CFS started in 2018 to test and revise the design of the present study. These subjects will be counted in the group of 50 participants with ME/CFS diagnosis when available data allow.

In addition to the participants with persistent fatigue, two control groups are included in the study. 150 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recruited from the Karolinska University Hospital Rheumatology department and 50 healthy controls. The RA controls fill out the illness generic questionnaires on paper and disease information is taken from the national registry for rheumatic disease and CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) data is taken from the medical record. The healthy controls follow the same procedure as the patients with persistent fatigue but only fill out the form and give blood samples at one time point.

Research questions:

  • Are there differences in patient reported fatigue dimensions, symptom burden including post exertional malaise, sleep disorders, health related quality of life, or inflammatory markers, nutritional markers and dietary intake, between patients with ME/CFS, BS and post-covid fatigue, patients with RA and healthy controls?
  • Are inflammatory markers and nutritional status associated with the development/recovery of fatigue and symptom burden in ME/CFS, BS and post-covid fatigue?
  • Can different subtypes of patients be identified based on latent factor analysis including fatigue dimensions, symptom profile, neuropsychiatric symptoms, inflammatory markers and nutritional status?
  • How does inflammatory markers, nutritional status, symptom burden and health related quality of life influence work ability and sick leave in patients with persistent fatigue over time?

The project group consists of a multidisciplinary team from Stockholm and Linköping universities as well as clinically active at clinics in the two regions who often meet patients with persistent fatigue.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska University Hospital Solna, dep medical psychology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients with a diagnosis of ME/CFS, burnout syndrome or post-COVID-19-syndrome. Control groups with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls are also included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis set within Stockholm County of ME/CFS, burnout syndrome or post-COVID-19-syndrome according to the Swedish version of the international classification of disease (ICD)-10
  • Control group (rheumatic disease): Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Control group (healthy): no diagnosis related to inflammatory disease or fatigue

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Organic or neuropsychiatric disease that explain the fatigue among cases diagnosed with ME/CFS, burnout syndrome or post-COVID-19-syndrome according to the Swedish ICD-10

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with longstanding complicated fatigue
The participants receive no intervention as part of this study.
Healthy controls
The participants receive no intervention as part of this study.
Controls with rheumatic disease
The participants receive no intervention as part of this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory)
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)-20 assesses five dimensions of fatigue. MFI-20 has an even proportion of positively and negatively worded items that are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Subscale scores (range 4-20) are calculated as the sum of item ratings and a total fatigue score (range 20-100) is calculated as the sum of subscale scores. Higher scores indicate a higher level of fatigue. The participants completes the MFI at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Change in symptom burden
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Symptom burden is assessed with a checklist and severity rating of the symptoms in the Canada criteria for ME/CFS. The checklist consists of 25 symptoms rated as present/non present. Severity of present symptoms are rated on a 4-point scale. The total score of 0-125 points with a higher score corresponding to a higher symptom burden. The participants completes this form at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Change in Generalized sickness behavior (Sickness questionnaire)
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
The sickness questionnaire assesses symptoms of sickness behavior. 10 items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, total score ranges from 0-30, the higher the scores the more symptoms. The participants completes the the Sickness questionnaire at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Change in health related quality of life (World health organization disability assessment scale)
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
The 12-item scale is summarized to a score of 0-100 and a higher score represents a worse quality of life/functioning. The participants completes WHO disability assessment scale (WHODAS) 2.0 at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Change in Inflammatory markers
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Inflammatory markers will be analysed in collaboration with Linköping University at the end of the study. State of the art methods available at study completion will be used. The participants donate blood sample at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. C-reactive protein is analyzed at the time of blood sampling.
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Dietary intake
Time Frame: 6 months
The participants complete 3 day diet diaries at month 6 that are analysed by a registered dietitian.
6 months
Nutritional status
Time Frame: 6 months
The participants take the Organix Basic test by Nordic Laboratories at month six.
6 months
Change in self-reported work ability
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
The participants report their sick leave (in %, higher % higher sick leave) and work ability (in percent, higher percent higher work ability) at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in insomnia score (insomnia severity index)
Time Frame: baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Insomnia severity index (ISI) is completed at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. ISI consists of 7 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 28 points, where a higher score corresponds to worse symptoms.
baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Gastrointestinal symptom burden (gastrointestinal symptom rating scale)
Time Frame: 6 and 18 months
The participant completes the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS-IBS) at 6 and 18 months. The GSRS-IBS includes 13 items that measure the severity of IBS symptoms in five clusters (pain, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, and early satiety) during the last seven days. The items are scored between 1 and 7, where 1 corresponds to "no discomfort at all" and 7 to "very severe discomfort" from the symptom. Total score ranges from 13 to 91, with a higher score corresponding to a higher symptom burden.
6 and 18 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Time Frame: baseline
Adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS). ASRS consists of 18 questions in two parts rated on a 5-point scale where a higher score corresponds to a higher symptom burden. Possible range 0-72 points.
baseline
Burnout
Time Frame: baseline
Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire (SMBQ)-22 consists of 22 items rated on a 7-point rating scale where a higher total score corresponds to a higher symptom level (range 22-145).
baseline
Perfectionism
Time Frame: baseline
Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (CPQ) consists of 12 statements rated on a 4-point Likert scale (range total score 4-48), a higher score corresponds to a higher rate of perfectionism
baseline
Attention spectrum disorder (ASD)
Time Frame: baseline
Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale (RAADS)-14 consists of 14 statements rated on a 4-point scale with a total score ranging from 0-42, with a higher score corresponding to more severe symptoms.
baseline
Presence of hypermobility
Time Frame: baseline
Participants complete the 5 PQ questionnaire for hypermobility at one time point. The questionnaire includes 5 items answered Yes/no, where 2 or more affirmations are indicative of hypermobility.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anna Andreasson, A Prof, Stockholm University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Subscribe