Telemedicine for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Persons Living With HIV Using CETA (TALC)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Karen Cropsey, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Telemedicine for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Persons Living With HIV Using Common Elements Treatment Approach

This study is designed to examine the efficacy of a brief intervention plus a cognitive-behavioral intervention compared to brief intervention alone to address unhealthy alcohol use and comorbid mental health symptoms to improve HIV outcomes among people living with HIV in Alabama.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI) or BI plus Common Elements Treatment Approach (T-CETA) via telephone. Participants will receive either 1 phone session of BI or 6 to 12 weekly phone sessions of BI + T-CETA. Follow ups will occur at 6 and 12 months with participants.

Participants will provide data on alcohol use, mental health comorbidities, HIV outcomes, medication adherence, and laboratory collections (CD4+ T cell count, viral load, and an alcohol biomarker: PEth) at the baseline assessment and again at the 6 and 12 month follow ups.

The study will also conduct mixed methods implementation measures with a subset of participants who are selected across various strata (i.e. gender, age, trial arm).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

308

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Living with HIV infection
  • Receiving HIV care at 1 of 4 participating AQMG sites (Alabama Quality Management Group sites - i.e. Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program-funded community clinics in Alabama)
  • Unhealthy alcohol use documented on the AUDIT survey delivered via PRO (i.e. 4 or greater points for women and greater than 8 points for men).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to use a mobile phone due to cognitive or physical impairments
  • Unable to speak sufficient English to provide informed consent and receive cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Active suicidality or psychosis
  • Risk for acute alcohol withdrawal or seizures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI)
At the time of trial enrollment, participants will receive a session of alcohol brief intervention (BI) via telephone.
The BI we will use was based on CETA's substance use module and was designed for one-on-one delivery. It is comprised of 6 elements (i.e. assessment, understanding impacts, exploring change, goal setting, identifying the reasons, and skill building) including a 2-week alcohol timeline follow back assessment, which is completed by the therapist. BI will be provided by a trained research assistant who has completed consent, enrollment, and randomized procedures with the client.
Experimental: Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) via Telemedicine
Participants will be provided with 6 to 12 weekly CETA sessions via telephone.
The BI we will use was based on CETA's substance use module and was designed for one-on-one delivery. It is comprised of 6 elements (i.e. assessment, understanding impacts, exploring change, goal setting, identifying the reasons, and skill building) including a 2-week alcohol timeline follow back assessment, which is completed by the therapist. BI will be provided by a trained research assistant who has completed consent, enrollment, and randomized procedures with the client.
CETA consists of nine key elements (i.e. engagement and education; safety assessment and planning; psychoeducation/introduction; substance use reduction; behavioral activation; cognitive coping/restructuring; relaxation; exposure; and problem solving) that address common mental health problems such as trauma, PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Participants randomized to CETA will be assigned to a CETA provider (clinical psychology or social work graduate student or master's degree substance abuse counselor). Enrolled participants will be discussed at weekly supervision meetings. An individualized treatment plan will be designed for each participant including type and order of CETA modules. The counselor will contact the participant by phone to schedule CETA sessions and follow up any missed appointments. Counselors, who will also be given a unique ID# for documentation and analysis, will carry 3-10 active CETA cases at a time depending on their experience level.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Alcohol Use at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by the participant's score on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). The minimum score on the AUDIT measure is 0, and the maximum score on the AUDIT measure is 40. For women, a score of of 4 or greater indicates hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption. For men, a score of 8 or greater indicates hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption. Higher scores on the AUDIT measure indicates more hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption.
6 months
Change from Baseline Alcohol Use at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by the participant's blood level of phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Participants will undergo a finger prick to collect a blood sample which will be analyzed for PEth level. PEth level of less than 20 ng/mL indicates abstinence or light drinking (from not drinking to averaging less than two drinks/day for several days a week). PEth level of 20-200 ng/mL indicates moderate level of drinking (averaging between 2 to 4 drinks/day for several days a week). Higher levels of PEth in the blood indicate more hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Substance Use at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The minimum score on each substance (i.e. tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, opioids, or other substances) is 0 to 3 (Low health risk). Moderate health risk is defined as a score of 4-26. High heath risk is defined as a score of 27 and higher. Higher scores indicate greater risk for health issues as a result of substance use.
6 months
Change from Baseline Substance Use at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined by the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The minimum score on each substance (i.e. tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, opioids, or other substances) is 0 to 3 (Low health risk). Moderate health risk is defined as a score of 4-26. High heath risk is defined as a score of 27 and higher. Higher scores indicate greater risk for health issues as a result of substance use.
12 months
Change from Baseline Depression at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) validated tool. The minimum score on this measure is 0 and the maximum score on this measure is 27. Higher scores on this measure indicates a worse outcome.
6 months
Change from Baseline Depression at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) validated tool. The minimum score on this measure is 0 and the maximum score on this measure is 27. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
12 months
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 21. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
6 months
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 21. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
12 months
Change from Baseline Traumatic Stress at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-IV (PCL-4) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 80. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
6 months
Change from Baseline Traumatic Stress at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-IV (PCL-4) validated tool. The minimum score of this measure is 0, and the maximum score of this measure is 80. Higher scores on this measure indicate a worse outcome.
12 months
Change from Baseline HIV Suppression at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by Viral Load <20 copies per mL. This testing will be done by the participant's physician and reported to study staff.
6 months
Change from Baseline HIV Suppression at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined by Viral Load <20 copies per mL. This testing will be done by the participant's physician and reported to study staff.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen Cropsey, Psy.D., University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiv

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Brief Intervention (BI)

Subscribe