RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair

July 16, 2021 updated by: Andreas Kroh, MD, RWTH Aachen University

Sublay Technique With Retromuscular Mesh Augmentation for Incisional Hernia Repair - A Prospective Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing "Lightweight" Versus "Heavyweight" Meshes

In this randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre clinical trial with a parallel group design a large-pore, lightweight polypropylene mesh (Ultrapro®) is compared to a small-pore, heavyweight polypropylene mesh (Premilene®), within a standardized, retromuscular mesh augmentation to identify the superiority of the lightweight mesh. Included patients are examined at five scheduled follow-up visits (5 and 21 days, 4, 12 and 24 months after surgery). The primary outcome criterion is foreign body sensation 12 month after surgery. Further secondary endpoint criteria are the occurrence of haematoma or haematoma requiring surgery at the 5-day visit, seroma, wound infection, and chronic pain within 24 months postoperatively. Quality of life was investigated by the SF-36®.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

188

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • NRW
      • Aachen, NRW, Germany, 52074
        • Department of Surgery, University Hospital Aachen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • fascial defect after vertical midline laparotomy with a minimum of 4 cm in diameter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hernia of other location
  • recurrent hernia
  • incarcerated hernia
  • emergency surgery
  • patients with a malignancy or chemotherapy within the last 3 months
  • pregnancy
  • participation in other studies
  • patients with a wound infection
  • missing informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrapro®
Participants received incisional hernia repair with an Ultrapro mesh in a sublay technique.
large-pore, lightweight polypropylene mesh
Experimental: Premilene®
Participants received incisional hernia repair with a Premilene mesh in a sublay technique.
small-pore, heavyweight polypropylene mesh

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
foreign body sensation
Time Frame: 12 month after surgery
Quality of life measurement based on the occurrence of a foreign body sensation for more than 3 months within 12 month after surgery.
12 month after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative seroma
Time Frame: 24 month
Fluid collection in the wound area
24 month
wound infection
Time Frame: 24 month
Clinical identification of superficial and deep wound infections.
24 month
haematoma
Time Frame: 5 days
hematoma in the wound area
5 days
hematoma requiring surgery
Time Frame: 5 days
hematoma in the wound area requiring surgery
5 days
chronic pain
Time Frame: 24 month
Chronic pain is defined as pain sensations that persist for more than 3 months after surgery. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with a range of 0-10 is used as a tool to measure pain.
24 month
hernia recurrence
Time Frame: 24 month
hernia recurrence is defined as a new abdominal wall defect in the area of surgery
24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ralf D Hilgers, Professor, Institute for Medical Statistics, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ultrapo-Studie

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incisional Hernia

Clinical Trials on Ultrapro® mesh

Subscribe