Safety of Liposom With Citalopram in Elderly Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

January 12, 2024 updated by: Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Liposom in Enhance and Speed up Response With Citalopram in Elderly Patients Suffering From Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

The purpose of this study is to determine if Liposom Forte will enhance the response to antidepressant therapy with citalopram in elderly patients suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The effects of phospholipid liposomes when associated with antidepressant drugs are very interesting. In addition to an improvement of somatic symptoms of depression, measured with the Hamilton Rate Scale for Depression, liposomes are able to reduce the latency of onset of the antidepressant activity of drugs like amitriptyline, clomipramine, and trazodone. These results indicate that phospholipids can be used as an adjuvant to antidepressant therapy, also allowing specific antidepressant drug dose reduction. Thus, the hypothesis is that combination therapy would not only lead to greater efficacy, but also to a more rapid onset of therapeutic response. The addition of Liposom Forte may be clinically important since it may ensure the use of lower citalopram doses, thereby reducing the risk of adverse events, and this may prove to be important, especially in elderly people.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Avezzano, Italy, 67051
        • Recruiting
        • UOC Geriatria e Lungodegenza Geriatrica PO San Filippo e Nicola di Avezzano - ASL1 Avezzano Sulmona L'aquila
        • Contact:
          • Giovambattista Desideri
      • Bergamo, Italy, 24127
        • Active, not recruiting
        • UO Psichiatria - ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
      • Codogno, Italy, 26845
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Ambulatorio Psichiatrico, UOC Psichiatria Presidio Ospedaliero di Codogno - ASST Lodi
      • Firenze, Italy, 50100
        • Active, not recruiting
        • SOD Geriatria-UTIG Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
      • Foggia, Italy, 71122
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e Cura (SPDC) Foggia, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia
      • Genova, Italy, 16128
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e Cura (SPDC) - ASL3 Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera
      • Genova, Italy, 16132
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Ambulatorio Clinica Psichiatrica, Ospedale Policlinico S. Martino
      • L'Aquila, Italy, 67100
        • Active, not recruiting
        • UOC Geriatria PO San Salvatore - ASL1 Avezzano Sulmona L'Aquila
      • Milano, Italy, 20121
        • Recruiting
        • SPDC Ospedale Fatebenefratell, UOC Psichiatria 1 ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
        • Contact:
          • Bernardo Dell'Osso
      • Milano, Italy, 20142
        • Recruiting
        • Centro Depressione Anziani S.C. Psichiatria 51, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - Presidio San Paolo
        • Contact:
          • Simone Cavallotti
      • Roma, Italy, 00189
        • Active, not recruiting
        • UOC Psichiatria - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Andrea
      • Udine, Italy, 33100
        • Recruiting
        • Clinica Psichiatrica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine
        • Contact:
          • Matteo Balestrieri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 84 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meets DSM-V criteria for major depressive disorder
  2. Score of ≥ 16 in the HAM-D
  3. Score of ≥ 23 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE-2)
  4. Aged ≥ 65 and < 85 years
  5. Patients able to understand the study procedures and to comply with protocol requirements
  6. Patients legally able to give written informed consent to the trial (signed and dated by the subject)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindication for treatment or intolerance to Liposom Forte or citalopram
  2. Congenital long QT syndrome, bradycardia, recent acute myocardial infarction, uncompensated heart failure or concomitant use of drugs that prolong the QT interval
  3. History of psychiatric disorder other than major depressive disorder, including history of substance use disorder
  4. Presence of psychotic symptoms, even if they are not sufficient to make diagnosis of a mental disorder
  5. Severe organic disease (e.g., major surgery, metastatic cancer, stroke, delirium, severe neurological disorder, heart attack, chronic heart failure, asthma, severe cardio circulatory disorders)
  6. Diabetes Mellitus type I and II
  7. Acute suicidal or violent behaviour or history of suicide attempt within the year prior to study entry or current suicidal ideation
  8. Treated with long acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics within 6 months prior to study entry
  9. Treated with any antipsychotics, antidepressant, food supplements or over-the-counter CNS-active medications (e.g, St. John's Wort, melatonin, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors [SSRIs], Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], Monoamine-Oxidase Inhibitors [MAOIs], or other antidepressants) within 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study medication
  10. Ongoing or planned psychotherapy or other psychological treatment during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A Liposom Forte + Citalopram
Liposom Forte (2 ampoules of 28mg/2 ml) for 30 days + citalopram (10mg) for 90 days
Liposom Forte 28mg/2ml solution for injection contains a mixture of purified hypothalamic phospholipids (PLs) from swine brains. The key components of the phospholipid mixture are phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylserine (PS).
Other Names:
  • Liposom
The medicinal product Citalopram Aurobindo contains citalopram as active ingredient available on the market in 20 mg film coated tablets. The tablets are divisible in two equal part of 10 mg as reported in the SmPC
Experimental: Group B Placebo + Citalopram
Placebo (2 ampoules of 2 ml) for 30 days + citalopram (10mg) for 90 days
The medicinal product Citalopram Aurobindo contains citalopram as active ingredient available on the market in 20 mg film coated tablets. The tablets are divisible in two equal part of 10 mg as reported in the SmPC
Liposom Forte Placebo (2 ampoules of 2 ml solution for injection)
Other Names:
  • Placebo of Liposom Forte

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of depressive symptoms atV5(day30)as change from baseline with HamiltonRatingScaleforDepression (21items,scoring based on the first17.9items from0=not present;to4=severe.8 from0-2.Scores from the first17items summed:≥16=MajorDep)
Time Frame: Day 30 (V5)
The purpose of this study is to determine if Liposom Forte will enhance the response to antidepressant therapy with citalopram in elderly patients suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). HamiltonRatingScaleforDepression (21items,scoring based on the first17.9items from0=not present;to4=severe.8 from0-2.Scores from the first17items summed:≥16=MajorDep)
Day 30 (V5)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of study treatments by tracking number and type of adverse events at each visit, up to V8 (Day 90)
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
To assess the safety of study treatments
From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Safety of study treatments by tracking, up to V8 (Day 90), 12-lead ECG, QTcF interval (Fridericia equation) will be measured
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 14 (V3) and Day 90 (V8)
To assess the safety of study treatments
From baseline to Day 14 (V3) and Day 90 (V8)
Safety of study treatments by tracking, up to V8 (Day 90), blood pressure measurements in mmHg
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
To assess the safety of study treatments tracking blood pressure measurement in mmHg
From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Safety of study treatments by tracking, up to V8 (Day 90), heart rate measurements in bpm
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
To assess the safety of study treatments tracking heart rate
From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Safety of study treatments by tracking, up to V8 (Day 90), oxygen saturation measurements in percentage with a pulse oximetry device
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
To assess the safety of study treatments tracking oxygen saturation
From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Change of depressive symptoms during the entire study as change from baseline therapy with citalopram over the entire study
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)

Change of depressive symptoms will be evaluated over the entire study as change from baseline using the HAM-D (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression). The score is based on the first 17 items: nine items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Eight are scored from 0-2. The score is summed and patients are categorized as follows: 0-7 = No depression 8-15 = Minor Depression

≥ 16 = Major Depression

From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Percentage of patients responders at V2, V3, V4 and V5. ≥50% improvement in HAM-D score vs baseline will be considered as responder.
Time Frame: From baseline through 30 days follow-up (V5)
determine if Liposom Forte will speed up response to antidepressant therapy with citalopram
From baseline through 30 days follow-up (V5)
Change of latency of antidepressant therapy with citalopram. Evaluated at V2,V3,V4 and V5 using HamiltonRatingScaleforDepression Latency time:the time from baseline to response (a≥50% improvement in HAM-D score vs baseline)
Time Frame: From baseline through 30 days follow-up (V5)
Determine if Liposom Forte will speed up response to antidepressant therapy with citalopram HamiltonRatingScaleforDepression (21items,scoring based on the first17.9items from0=not present;to4=severe.8 from0-2.Scores from the first17items summed:≥16=MajorDep)
From baseline through 30 days follow-up (V5)
ClinicalGlobalImpression as change from baseline up toV8Day90.CGI:7point scale clinician-rated(severity of illness)from1(normal)to7(severely ill).CGI score from1(very much improved)to7(very much worse).Treatment response consider efficacy andAEs
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Determine the Clinical Global Impression to treatments
From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Change of depressive symptoms as change from baseline using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15).
Time Frame: From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)
Change of depressive symptoms will be evaluated over the entire study. GDS:brief questionnaire:15questions with options yes or no in reference to how patients felt on the day of administration. Answers indicating depression are in bold and italicized; score one point for each one selected. A score of 0 to 5 is normal. A score greater than 5 suggests depression.
From baseline through 90 days follow-up (V8)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nicola Giordan, Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Liposom Forte

Subscribe