A Study for Post-Marketing Surveillance of Nesina® Tablet Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) in South Korea

March 31, 2022 updated by: Takeda

Post Marketing Surveillance Protocol for Nesina® Tablet [Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety by determining the incidence rates of all adverse events (AEs) including serious adverse events (SAEs)/serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs), unexpected AEs and ADRs that are not reflected in the precautions for use, ADRs already known, non-serious ADRs and other safety related information among participants who have received alogliptin for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a long-term prospective, observational post-marketing surveillance study of alogliptin in participants with T2DM. The study assessed the safety and effectiveness of alogliptin for its approved indication within a real-world setting in South Korea.

The study will enroll approximately 3000 participants. The data is collected prospectively at the study sites and recorded in electronic case report forms (e-CRFs). All the participants are assigned to a single observational cohort:

• Nesina® Tablet

The multi-center study is conducted in South Korea. Data is collected at 13 and 26 weeks after enrollment during standard of care office visits. The overall study was conducted during re-examination period of approximately 5 years and 4 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3623

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Andong, Korea, Republic of
      • Anyang-si, Korea, Republic of
      • Bucheon-si, Korea, Republic of
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
      • Gimhae, Korea, Republic of
      • Gongju, Korea, Republic of
      • Goyang-si, Korea, Republic of
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
      • Gyeongju, Korea, Republic of
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of
      • Jeonju, Korea, Republic of
      • Namyangju-si, Korea, Republic of
      • Osan, Korea, Republic of
      • Seongnam, Korea, Republic of
      • Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Suncheon, Korea, Republic of
      • Suwon- si, Korea, Republic of
      • Suwon-si, Korea, Republic of
      • Ulsan, Korea, Republic of
      • Wonju, Korea, Republic of

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus are observed.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Had one of the following treatments with alogliptin for the first time as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control:

  • Monotherapy with alogliptin
  • Combination therapy with the surveillance drug (alogliptin) in case of inadequate glycemic control with metformin or sulfonylurea or thiazolidinedione single therapy
  • Combination therapy with the surveillance drug (alogliptin) in case of inadequate glycemic control with thiazolidinedione and metformin combination therapy
  • Combination therapy with the surveillance drug (alogliptin) in case of inadequate glycemic control with insulin (single therapy or combination with metformin) therapy
  • Combination therapy with metformin in patients who have no prior history of antidiabetic medication and may not achieve adequate glycemic control with monotherapy alogliptin

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had alogliptin treatment outside of the locally approved label in Korea
  2. Had a contraindication for the use of alogliptin (as described in the Korean product label)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Nesina® Tablet
Participants with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes who took Nesina® tablet (alogliptin), as prescribed by the physician, are observed in this study.
Alogliptin benzoate tablets
Other Names:
  • Nesina® Tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
An SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. 95% Confidence Interval was calculated using exact method.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
Serious ADRs are defined as SAEs that are, in the investigator's opinion, of causal relationship to the study treatment. An SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. 95% Confidence Interval was calculated using exact method.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Events
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
An unexpected AE is an AE with a difference in nature, severity, specificity, or outcome, compared to the product licensure/safety notification of the drug. 95% Confidence Interval was calculated using exact method.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)
Unexpected ADRs are unexpected AEs that are, in the investigator's opinion, of causal relationship to the study treatment. 95% Confidence Interval was calculated using exact method.
From first dose of study drug up to 30 days post last dose of study drug (Up to 79.77 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Haemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels
Time Frame: Baseline (Before administration of alogliptin), 13 weeks (±2 weeks) and 26 weeks (±2 weeks) after administration
HbA1c are glycated haemoglobin or amount of glucose attached to haemoglobin.
Baseline (Before administration of alogliptin), 13 weeks (±2 weeks) and 26 weeks (±2 weeks) after administration
Fasting Blood Glucose Levels
Time Frame: Baseline (Before administration of alogliptin), 13 weeks (±2 weeks) and 26 weeks (±2 weeks) after administration
Baseline (Before administration of alogliptin), 13 weeks (±2 weeks) and 26 weeks (±2 weeks) after administration
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c < 7.00%
Time Frame: Baseline (Before administration of alogliptin), 13 weeks (±2 weeks) and 26 weeks (±2 weeks) after administration
HbA1c are glycated haemoglobin or amount of glucose attached to haemoglobin.
Baseline (Before administration of alogliptin), 13 weeks (±2 weeks) and 26 weeks (±2 weeks) after administration
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement and Final Effectiveness Assessment
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
Participants were assessed for overall improvement and effectiveness assessments as per the following categories: 'Improved - signs and symptoms are significantly improved'; 'Unchanged - improvement in signs and symptoms is not significant or there is no change in signs and symptoms'.
Up to Week 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 19, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Alogliptin Benzoate

Subscribe