Real World Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Conbercept Ophthalmic Injection in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity - Multicenter, Retrospective and Observational Study Based on Real World Data

September 15, 2022 updated by: Chengdu Kanghong Biotech Co., Ltd.
This study is a retrospective, multi-center real world study. The real world data comes from the electronic medical record system and disease database of the research centers .The patient's demographic information, disease information, clinical treatment status, efficacy evaluation and adverse events and so on will be collected and evaluated by applicability of the data, generated an analysis data set. Use the causal inference method of statistical analysis to observe the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal injection of Conbercept, and explore the effectiveness and safety of different doses in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Peking University People's Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients with retinopathy of prematurity in treatment of zone 1 (stage 1+, stage 2+, stage 3, stage 3+) or zone 2 (stage 2+, stage 3+) or AP-ROP (rapidly progressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity)

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patient who are diagnosed as retinopathy of prematurity using clinical fundus screening;
  2. Patients at the initial stage of treatment whose one eye at least has the following condition: Stage 1+, Stage 2+, Stage 3, Stage 3+ in Zone 1; or Stage 2+, Stage 3+ in Zone 2; or those with AP-ROP according to the international ROP classification,;
  3. Patient for whom the first treatment is laser therapy, intravitreal injection of Conbercept or ranibizumab;

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with neurological diseases that seriously affect visual function;
  2. Patient or his mother (during pregnancy) has received intravitreal or systemic anti-VEGF drug therapy for other diseases;

Elimination criteria:

  1. Patients with insufficient data on treatment or medication;
  2. Patients who are followed up for less than 3 months after treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Conbercept
In clinical treatment and research, the applied doses of Conbercept in patients with retinopathy of prematurity have been reduced compared with adults, mostly half of the adult dose. The commonly used exposure dose of intravitreal injection of Conbercept ophthalmic injection is 0.25mg/0.025ml.In addition, possible exposure doses are but not limited to 0.15mg/0.15ml, 0.1mg/ 0.1ml, 0.2mg/0.2ml, etc.
Ranibizumab
In clinical treatment and research, the applied doses of Ranibizumab in patients with retinopathy of prematurity have been reduced compared with adults, mostly half of the adult dose. The commonly used exposure dose of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab ophthalmic injection is 0.25mg/0.025ml.In addition, possible exposure doses are but not limited to 0.15mg/0.15ml, 0.1mg/ 0.1ml, 0.2mg/0.2ml, etc.
Laser Treatment
In clinical and research studies, lasers are used to treat patients with retinopathy of prematurity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Main effectiveness indicators
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Proportion of eyes with no active retinopathy of prematurity and no structural adverse outcome (within 24 weeks after the first treatment; active retinopathy of prematurity is defined as additional lesions, vascular tortuosity, crest and other lesions having no alleviation but trend of progress after clinical treatment and new blood vessels continuing to exist or new born; poor structural outcomes are defined as adverse results such as retinal detachment, retinal traction or macular abnormalities after clinical treatment)
24 weeks
Main safety indicators
Time Frame: 24weeks
The proportion of affected eyes with ocular AEs (within 24 weeks after the first treatment)
24weeks
Primary endpoint
Time Frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with inactive retinopathy of prematurity and without structural adverse outcomes at 24 weeks after the first treatment (inactive retinopathy of prematurity is defined as the reduction in additional lesions, vascular tortuosity, ridges and other lesions after clinical treatment, showing no trend of progression, no persistent or newly developed neovascularization; no structural adverse outcome is defined as the absence of adverse outcomes such as retinal detachment, retinal traction, or macular abnormalities after clinical treatment)
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: at 1 week and 24 weeks
To evaluate the response rate of the first treatment at 1 week and 24 weeks after the first treatment (the response rate is defined as the proportion of patients after the first treatment who do not need the second treatment, with disappearance of the additional lesions or the reduction of the vascular tortuosity, the reduction or regression of the ridges, and with initiation of vascularization in the neighboring avas-cular area (or retinal vascularization to zone III);
at 1 week and 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: at 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with recurrence and the time to recurrence at 24 weeks after the first treatment (recurrence is defined as the recurrence of ridgelike changes or fibrovascular proliferation in the original lesion, complicated by the recurrence of additional lesions in the posterior pole);
at 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes undergoing the second treatment within 24 weeks after the first treatment (the second treatment is defined as the second treatment that is given after the first treatment, regardless of whether the treatment measure is adjusted or not);
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of target eyes requiring a second treatment modality within 24 weeks after the first treatment (the treatment modality means laser therapy, anti-VEGF drug therapy and surgery, and the second treatment modality includes change of anti-VEGF drug);
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of target eyes whose treatment measures were switched within 24 weeks after the first treatment (the switching treatment is defined as the conversion to laser therapy, anti-VEGF drug therapy and surgery);
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the number of treatments with Conbercept, ranibizumab, and laser within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with ocular AEs within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with TEAEs within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: at 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with aggravated retinopathy staging at 24 weeks after the first treatment;
at 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the incidence of endophthalmitis within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes undergoing vitreous surgery within 24 weeks after the first treatment;
within 24 weeks
Secondary endpoints
Time Frame: within 24 weeks
To evaluate the proportion of eyes with ROP complications within 24 weeks after the first treatment. (Complications include cataracts, glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, fibrosis, and ocular atrophy, etc.)
within 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory Endpoints
Time Frame: January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021

To explore and evaluate the changes in the following longterm observational indicators, which are for descriptive analysis only.

1、Proportion of target eyes with complete retinal vascularization (the complete retinal vascularization is defined as retinal blood vessels extending to the serrata on the nasal side, and 1 optic disc diameter from the serrata on the temporal side);

January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021
Exploratory Endpoints
Time Frame: January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021
2. Proportion of eyes with refractive abnormalities;
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021
Exploratory Endpoints
Time Frame: January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021
3、Proportion of eyes with abnormal ocular visual function (the ocular visual function indicators include peripheral visual field, etc.);
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021
Exploratory Endpoints
Time Frame: January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021
4、Proportion of target eyes with abnormal biological feature (the biological feature include axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, etc.).
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2021

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jianhong Liang, Peking University People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retinopathy of Prematurity

Subscribe